Aging transition of the bacterial community structure in the chick ceca

Poultry Science

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1004-1008

  Tanikawa, T ^a   Shoji, N ^a   Sonohara, N ^a   Saito, S ^a   Shimura, Y ^a   Fukushima, J ^a   Inamoto, T ^a  

^a AKITA PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bacterial community; Chick; Competitive exclusion; Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL DNA; RNA 16S;

AGING; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; CECUM; CHICKEN; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; MALE; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY;

AGING; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; CECUM; CHICKENS; DNA, BACTERIAL; MALE; PHYLOGENY; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 16S;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); ESCHERICHIA COLI;

EID: 79955493496     PISSN: 00325791     EISSN: 15253171     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-01153     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Amit-Romach, E., D. Sklan, and Z. Uni. 2004. Microflora ecology of the chicken intestine using 16S ribosomal DNA primers. Poult. Sci. 83:1093-1098.
2. Fischer, S. G., and L. S. Lerman. 1983. DNA fragments differing by single base-pair substitutions are separated in denaturing gradient gels: Correspondence with melting theory. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80:1579-1583.
3. Gong, J., R. J. Forster, H. Yu, J. R. Chambers, P. M. Sabour, R. Wheatcroft, and S. Chen. 2002. Diversity and phylogenetic analysis of bacteria in the mucosa of chicken ceca and comparison with bacteria in the cecal lumen. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 208:1-7.
4. Hume, M. E., L. F. Kubena, T. S. Edrington, C. J. Donskey, R. W. Moore, S. C. Ricke, and D. J. Nisbet. 2003. Poultry digestive microflora biodiversity as indicated by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Poult. Sci. 82:1100-1107.
5. Lan, P. T. N., H. Hayashi, M. Sakamoto, and Y. Benno. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of cecal microbiota in chicken by the use of 16S rDNA clone libraries. Microbiol. Immunol. 46:371-382.
6. Larkin, M. A., G. Blackshields, N. P. Brown, R. Chenna, P. A. McGettigan, H. McWilliam, F. Valentin, I. M. Wallace, A. Wilm, R. Lopez, J. D. Thompson, T. J. Gibson, and D. G. Higgins. 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947-2948.
7. Lu, J., U. Idris, B. Harmon, C. Hofacre, J. J. Maurer, and M. D. Lee. 2003. Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:6816-6824.
8. Mahmood, S., T. E. Freitag, and J. I. Prosser. 2006. Comparison of PCR primer-based strategies for characterization of ammonia oxidizer communities in environmental samples. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 56:482-493.
9. Nurmi, E., and M. Rantala. 1973. New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature 241:210-211.
10. Ochi, Y., T. Mitsuoka, and T. Sega. 1964. Untersuchungen uber die Darmflora des Huhnes. III Mitteilung: Die Entwicklung der Darmflora von Küken bis zum Huhn. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Parasitenkd. Infektionskr. Hyg. Abt. 1 Orig. 193:80-95.
11. Ricke, S. C., M. E. Hume, S. Y. Park, R. W. Moore, S. G. Birkhold, L. F. Kubena, and D. J. Nisbet. 2004. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) as a rapid method for assessing gastrointestinal tract microflora responses in laying hens fed similar zinc molt induction diets. J. Rapid Methods Autom. Microbiol. 12:69-81.
12. Smith, H. W. 1965. The development of the flora of the alimentary tract in young animals. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 90:495-513.
13. van der Wielen, P. W., D. A. Keuzenkamp, L. J. Lipman, F. van Knapen, and S. Biesterveld. 2002. Spatial and temporal variation of the intestinal bacterial community in commercially raised broiler chickens during growth. Microb. Ecol. 44:286-293.
14. Yanisch-Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: Nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103-119.
15. Zhu, X. Y., T. Zhong, Y. Pandya, and R. D. Joerger. 2002. 16S rRNA-based analysis of microbiota from the cecum of broiler chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:124-137.