Can a 50 cents reward really choke working memory maintenance process?

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 363-365

  Vidal, Manuel ^a   Mossio, Matteo ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MONEY; MOTIVATION; NOTE; REINFORCEMENT; REWARD; WORD LIST RECALL; WORKING MEMORY;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; HUMANS; MEMORY, SHORT-TERM; REWARD; SUBLIMINAL STIMULATION;

EID: 79955481489     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.017     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Gilbert A.M., Fiez J.A. Integrating rewards and cognition in the frontal cortex. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience 2004, 4(4):540-552.
2. Mobbs D., Hassabis D., Seymour B., Marchant J.L., Weiskopf N., Dolan R.J., et al. Choking on the money: Reward-based performance decrements are associated with midbrain activity. Psychological Science 2009, 20(8):955-962.
3. Pashler H., Johnston J.C. Attentional limitations in dual-task performance. Attention 1998, 155-189. Psychology Press, Hove, UK. H. Pashler (Ed.).
4. Pessiglione M., Schmidt L., Draganski B., Kalisch R., Lau H., Dolan R.J., et al. How the brain translates money into force: A neuroimaging study of subliminal motivation. Science 2007, 316(5826):904-906.
5. Zedelius C.M., Veling H., Aarts H. Boosting or choking - How conscious and unconscious reward processing modulate the active maintenance of goal-relevant information. Consciousness and Cognition 2011, 20:355-362.