A note on testing for complementarity and substitutability in the case of multiple practices

Journal of Productivity Analysis

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 263-269

  Carree, Martin ^a   Lokshin, Boris ^a   Belderbos, René ^a,b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Complementarity; Firm performance; Supermodularity

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955477397     PISSN: 0895562X     EISSN: 15730441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11123-010-0189-8     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Arora A (1996) Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: a note. Econ Lett 50: 51-55.
2. Arora A, Gambardella A (1990) Complementarity and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. J Ind Econ 38: 361-379.
3. Athey S, Stern S (1998) An empirical framework for testing theories about complementarity in organizational design. NBER working paper no. 6600.
4. Athey S, Stern S (2002) The impact of information technology on emergency health care outcomes. RAND J Econom 33: 399-432.
5. Baumol W, Panzar JC, Willig RD (1988) Contestable markets and the theory of industry structure. Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich.
6. Belderbos R, Carree M, Lokshin B (2006) Complementarity in R& D cooperation strategies. Rev Ind Organ 28: 401-426.
7. Black S, Lynch L (2001) How to compete: the impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Rev Econ Stat 83: 434-445.
8. Bresnahan T, Brynjolfsson E, Hit LM (2002) Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. Quart J Econ 117: 339-375.
9. Caroli E, van Reenen J (2001) Skill-biased organizational change? Evidence from a panel of British and French establishments. Quart J Econ 116: 1449-1492.
10. Catozzella A, Vivarelli M (2007) The catalyzing role of in-house R& D in fostering the complementarity of innovative inputs, IZA discussion paper 3126.
11. Cozzarin BP, Percival JC (2006) Complementarities between organizational strategies and innovation. Econ Innov New Technol 15: 195-217.
12. Galia F, Legros D (2004) Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France. Res Policy 33: 1185-1199.
13. Gouriéroux C, Holly A, Monfort A (1982) Likelihood ratio test, Wald test, and Kuhn-Tucker test in linear models with inequality constraints on the regression parameters. Econometrica 50: 63-80.
14. Grossman G, Maggi G (2000) Diversity and trade. Am Econ Rev 90: 1255-1275.
15. Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity. Am Econ Rev 87: 291-313.
16. Judge G, Hill R, Griffiths W, Lütkepohl H, Lee T-C (1982) Introduction to the theory and practice of econometrics. Wiley, Hoboken.
17. Kodde D, Palm F (1986) Wald criteria for jointly testing equality and inequality restrictions. Econometrica 54: 1243-1248.
18. Laursen K, Foss NJ (2003) New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge J Econ 27: 243-263.
19. Leiponen A (2005) Skills and innovation. Int J Indust Organ 23: 303-323.
20. Love JH, Roper S (2009) Organizing the innovation process: complementarities in innovation networking. Ind Innov 16: 273-290.
21. Milgrom P, Roberts J (1990) The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy, and organization. Am Econ Rev 80: 511-528.
22. Miravete EJ, Pernias JC (2004) Innovation complementarity and scale of production CEPR discussion paper no 4483.
23. Mohnen P, Röller L-H (2005) Complementarities in innovation policy. Eur Econ Rev 49: 1431-1450.
24. Oh M-S (1998) A Bayes test for simple versus one-sided hypothesis on the mean vector of a multivariate normal distribution. Commun Stat Theory Methods 27: 2371-2389.
25. Olejnik S, Li J, Supattathum S, Huberty CJ (1997) Multiple testing and statistical powers with modified Bonferroni procedures. J Educ Behav Stat 22: 389-406.
26. Savin NE (1980) The Bonferroni and the Scheffé multiple comparison procedures. Rev Econ Stud 47: 255-273.
27. Wolak F (1989) Testing inequality constraints in linear econometric models. J Econom 41: 205-235.