Robust net present value

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 54, Issue 1-2, 2011, Pages 233-242

  Hanafizadeh, Payam ^a   Latif, Vahideh ^b  

^a ALLAMEH TABATABA'I UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Future cash flows; Net present value; Robust approach

Indexed keywords

C++ PROGRAMMING; CASH FLOW; FINANCIAL PROCESS; HISTORICAL DATA; MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION; NET PRESENT VALUE; NEW APPROACHES; NUMERICAL EXAMPLE; RISK AVERSION; RISK TAKING; ROBUST APPROACH; ROBUST APPROACHES; SIZE AND SHAPE; UNCERTAIN PARAMETERS;

UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 79955471665     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2011.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Stone R. Management of Engineering Projects 1988, Macmillan Education, London.
2. Jonathan E., Ingersoll Theory of Financial Decision Making 1987, Yale University press, New Haven.
3. Sobel M.J., Szmerekovsky J.G., Tilson V. Scheduling projects with stochastic activity duration to maximize expected net present value. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 198:697-705.
4. Ross S.A. Uses, abuses, and alternatives to the net-present-value rule. Financial Management 1995, 24(3):96-102.
5. Berkovitch E., Israel R. Why the NPV criterion does not maximize NPV. The Review of Financial Studies 2004, 17(1):239-255.
6. Magni C.A. Investment decisions in the theory of finance: some antinomies and inconsistencies. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 137:206-217.
7. Reyck B.D. On investment decision in the theory of finance: some antinomies and inconsistencies. European Journal of Operational Research 2005, 161:499-504.
8. Hanafizadeh P., Seifi A. A unified model for robust optimization of linear programs with uncertain parameters. Transactions on Operational Research 2004, 16:20-45.
9. Jovanovic P. Application of sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation under uncertainty and risk. International Journal of Project Management 1999, 17:217-222.
10. Willem J.H., Groenendaal V. Estimating NPV variability for deterministic models. European Journal of Operational Research 1998, 107:202-213.
11. Xu C., Gertner G.Z. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for models with correlated parameters. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 2007, 51:5579-5590.
12. Hanafizadeh P., Kazazi A., Jalili Bolhasani A. Portfolio design for investment companies through scenario planning. Management Decision 2011, 49(4).
13. Bertsimas D., Pachamanova D., Sim M. Robust linear optimization under general norms. Opeations Research Letters 2004, 32:510-516.
14. Coates E.R., Kuhl M.E. Using simulation software to solve engineering economy problems. Computers and Industrial Engineering 2003, 45:285-294.
15. Dixit A.K., Pindyck R.S. Investment Under Uncertainty 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton.
16. Lin T.T. Applying the maximum NPV rule with discounted/growth factors to a flexible production scale model. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 196:628-634.
17. Reyck B.D., Degraeve Z., Vandenborre R. Project options valuation with net present value and decision tree analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 184:341-355.
18. R. Campbell, F. Harvey, School of Business, Duke university, NC, National Bureau of economic research, Cambridge, MA, December, 1999.
19. Keswani A., Shackleton M.B. How real option disinvestment flexibility augments project NPV. European Journal of Operational Research 2006, 168:240-252.
20. Dimitrakopoulos R.G., Sabry A., Sabour A. Evaluating mine plans under uncertainty: can the real options make a difference?. Resources Policy 2007, 32:116-125.
21. Kunsch P.L., Ruttiens A., Chevalier A. A methodology using option pricing to determine a suitable discount rate in environmental management. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 185:1674-1679.
22. Samis M., Davis G., Laughton D., Poulin R. Valuing uncertain asset cash flows when there are no options: a real option approach. Resources Policy 2006, 30:285-298.
23. Borgonovo E., Peccati L. Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis in the evaluation of investment projects. International Journal of Production Economics 2006, 104:62-73.
24. Hanafizadeh P., Seifi A. Tuning the unified robust model of uncertain linear programs. IUST International Journal of Engineering Science 2006, 17:49-54.
25. Borgonovo E., Peccati L. Sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics 2004, 90:17-25.
26. Eschenbach T.G., Gimple R.J. Stochastic sensitivity analysis. The Engineering Economist 1990, 35(4):305-321.
27. Park C.S. Contemporary Engineering Economics 1997, Addison-Wesly, Menlo Park, CA. 2nd ed.
28. Bourbaki N. Topological vector spaces. Elements of Mathematics 1987, Springer, New York, Chapters 1-5.
29. Boyd S., Vandenberghe L. Convex Optimization 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Hanafizadeh P., Seifi A., Ponnambalam k. Primal and dual robust counterparts of uncertain linear programs: an application to portfolio selection. Journal of Industrial Engineering International 2006, 2(1):38-52.
31. Damodaran A. Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset 2002, John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken. 2nd ed.