Head-repositioning does not reduce the reproducibility of fMRI activation in a block-design motor task

NeuroImage

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 1329-1337

  Soltysik, David A ^a   Thomasson, David ^b   Rajan, Sunder ^a   Gonzalez Castillo, Javier ^c   DiCamillo, Paul ^b   Biassou, Nadia ^b  

^a CENTER FOR DEVICES AND RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Finger tapping; FMRI; Reproducibility; Test retest

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANTERIOR COMMISSURE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FINGER; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEAD POSITION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION;

ADULT; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FINGERS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HEAD; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LINEAR MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; MOVEMENT; OXYGEN; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

EID: 79955466438     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.023     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Alecci M., Collins C.M., Smith M.B., Jezzard P. Radio frequency magnetic field mapping of a 3 Tesla birdcage coil: experimental and theoretical dependence on sample properties. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 46:379-385.
2. Bennett C.M., Miller M.B. How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging?. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2010, 1191:133-155.
3. Birn R.M., Cox R.W., Bandettini P.A. Detection versus estimation in event-related fMRI: choosing the optimal stimulus timing. Neuroimage 2002, 15:252-264.
4. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Measurement error. BMJ 1996, 313:744.
5. Cohen M.S. Parametric analysis of fMRI data using linear systems methods. Neuroimage 1997, 6:93-103.
6. Cohen M.S., DuBois R.M. Stability, repeatability, and the expression of signal magnitude in functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999, 10:33-40.
7. Collignon A., Maes F., Delaere D., Vandermeulen D., Suetens P., Marchal G. Automated multi-modality image registration based on information theory. Inf. Process. Med. Imaging (IPMI) 1995, 263-274.
8. Cox R.W. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996, 29:162-173.
9. Cox R.W., Jesmanowicz A. Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 1997, 42:1014-1018.
10. Frahm J., Merboldt K.-D., Hänicke W. Functional MRI of human brain activation at high spatial resolution. Magn. Reson. Med. 1993, 29:139-144.
11. Freidman L., Glover G.H. Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2006, 23:827-839.
12. Genovese C.R., Lazar N.A., Nichols T. Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage 2002, 15:870-878.
13. Glover G.H., Li T.-Q., Ress D. Image-based method for retrospective correction of physiological motion effects in fMRI: RETROICOR. Magn. Reson. Med. 2000, 44:162-167.
14. Haacke E.M., Brown R.W., Thompson M.R., Venkatesan R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence Design. Wiley-Liss, New York 1999.
15. Hennig J., Speck O., Koch M.A., Weiller C. Functional magnetic resonance imaging: a review of methodological aspects and clinical applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003, 18:1-15.
16. Huettel S.A., Song A.W., McCarthy G. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2004, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, Massachusetts.
17. Hyde J.S., Biswal B.B., Jesmanowicz A. High-resolution fMRI using multislice partial k-space with cubic voxels. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 46:114-125.
18. Jenkinson M., Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med. Image Anal. 2001, 5:143-156.
19. Krüger G., Glover G.H. Physiological noise in oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 46:631-637.
20. Krüger G., Kastrup A., Glover G.H. Neuroimaging at 1.5T and 3.0T: comparison of oxygenation-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 2001, 45:595-604.
21. Laurienti P.J., Field A.S., Burdette J.H., Maldjian J.A., Yen Y.-F., Moody D.M. Dietary caffeine consumption modulates fMRI measures. Neuroimage 2002, 17:751-757.
22. McGonigle D.J., Howseman A.M., Athwal B.S., Friston K.J., Frackowiak R.S.J., Holmes A.P. Variability in fMRI: an examination of intersession differences. Neuroimage 2000, 11:708-734.
23. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuopsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
24. Raemaekers M., Vink M., Zandbelt B., van Wezel R.J.A., Kahn R.S., Ramsey N.F. Test-retest reliability of fMRI activation during prosaccades and antisaccades. Neuroimage 2007, 36:532-542.
25. Rombouts A.R.B., Barkhof F., Hoogenraad F.G.C., Sprenger M., Scheltens P. Within-subject reproducibility of visual activation patterns with functional magnetic resonance imaging using multislice echo planar imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1998, 16:105-113.
26. Rombouts S.A.R.B., Barkhof F., Hoogenraad F.G.C., Sprenger M., Valk J., Scheltens P. Test-retest analysis with functional MR of the activated area in the human visual cortex. AJNR 1997, 18:1317-1322.
27. Rombouts S.A.R.B., Barkhof F., Scheltens P. Clinical Applications of Functional Brain MRI 2007, Oxford University Press, New York.
28. Saad Z.R., Glen D.R., Chen G., Beauchamp M.S., Desai R., Cox R.W. A new method for improving function-to-structural MRI alignment using local Pearson correlation. Neuroimage 2009, 44:839-848.
29. Shrout P.E., Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 1979, 86:420-428.
30. Talairach J., Tournoux P. Co-planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain 1988, Thieme Medical, New York.
31. Thompson R.M., Jack C.R., Butts K., Hanson D.P., Riederer S.J., Ehman R.L., Hynes R.W., Hangiandreou N.J. Imaging of cerebral activation at 1.5T: optimizing a technique for conventional hardware. Neuroradiology 1994, 190:873-877.
32. Waldvogel D., van Gelderen P., Immisch I., Pfeiffer C., Hallett M. The variability of serial fMRI data: correlation between a visual and a motor task. Neuroreport 2000, 11:3843-3847.
33. Zandbelt B.B., Gladwin T.E., Raemaekers M., van Buuren M., Neggers S.F., Kahn R.S., Ramsey N.F., Vink M. Within-subject variation in BOLD-fMRI signal changes across repeated measures: quantification and implications for sample size. Neuroimage 2008, 42:196-206.