Fuzzy image regions for estimation of impervious surface areas

Remote Sensing Letters

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 19-27

  Lizarazo, Ivan ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DISTRITAL FRANCISCO JOSÉ DE CALDAS   (Colombia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEATURE ANALYSIS; FUZZY IMAGE SEGMENTATION; FUZZY SEGMENTATION; IMAGE REGIONS; IMPERVIOUS SURFACE AREA; INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS; LAND COVER; LANDSAT; MEMBERSHIP VALUES; PRE-PROCESSING; QUALITATIVE CLASSIFICATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOMETRIC NORMALIZATION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE TECHNIQUES; TM IMAGE; URBAN LAND COVER;

ESTIMATION; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; LANDFORMS;

IMAGE SEGMENTATION;

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; LAND COVER; LANDSAT THEMATIC MAPPER; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOMETRIC SURVEY; SURFACE AREA; URBAN AREA;

EID: 79955462107     PISSN: 2150704X     EISSN: 21507058     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01431160903246683     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. CLAPHAM, W.B., 2005, Quantitative classification as a tool to show change in an urbanizing watershed. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26, pp. 4923-4939.
2. FISHER, P., 1997, The pixel: a snare and a delusion. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, pp. 679-685.
3. FOODY, G.M. andMATHUR, A., 2004, A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42, pp. 1336-1343.
4. GOETZ, S.J. and JANTZ, P., 2006, Satellite maps show Chesapeake Bay urban development. EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union, 87, pp. 149-156.
5. HYVARINEN, A., KARHUNEN, J. and OJA, E., 2001, Independent Component Analysis (New York: Wiley Interscience).
6. JANTZ, P., GOETZ, S. and JANTZ, C., 2005, Urbanization and the loss of resource lands in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Environmental Management, 36, pp. 808-825. (Pubitemid 41667031)
7. JENSEN, J., 2005, Introductory Image Processing: a Remote Sensing Perspective (Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall).
8. LIZARAZO, I., 2008, SVM-based segmentation and classification of remotely sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, pp. 7277-7283.
9. LIZARAZO, I. and ELSNER, P., 2008, Fuzzy regions for handling uncertainty in remote sensing image segmentation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Applications (ICCSA 2008), July 2008 (Berlin: Springer), pp. 724-739.
10. LIZARAZO, I. and ELSNER, P., 2009, Fuzzy segmentation for object-based image classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30, pp. 1643-1649.
11. PAL, M., 2006, Support vector machine-based feature selection for land cover classification: a case study with DAIS hyperspectral data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27, pp. 2877-2894. (Pubitemid 44219161)
12. R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM, 2005, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing), ISBN 3-900051-07-0.
13. WALTON, J.T., 2008, Subpixel urban land cover estimation: comparing cubist, random forests, and support vector regression. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 74, pp. 1213-1222.