Implementation of evidence-based therapies for myocardial infarction and survival

JAMA

Volumn 305, Issue 16, 2011, Pages 1710-1711

  Mukherjee, Debabrata ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT;

BEHAVIOR CHANGE; EDITORIAL; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SURVIVAL; SWEDEN; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 79955456606     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2011.521     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics- 2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011; 123(4):e18-e209.
2. Roe MT, Parsons LS, Pollack CV Jr, et al; National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Investigators. Quality of care by classification of myocardial infarction: treatment patterns for ST-segment elevation vs non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(14):1630-1636. (Pubitemid 41124158)
3. Mukherjee D, Fang J, Chetcuti S, Moscucci M, Kline-Rogers E, Eagle KA. Impact of combination evidence-based medical therapy on mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation. 2004;109(6):745-749. (Pubitemid 38222894)
4. Rasmussen JN, Chong A, Alter DA. Relationship between adherence to evidencebased pharmacotherapy and long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2007;297(2):177-186. (Pubitemid 46089734)
5. Jernberg T, Johanson P, Held C, Svennblad B, Lindbäck J, Wallentin L; SWEDEHEART, RIKS-HIA. Association between adoption of evidence-based treatment and survival for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, 1996-2007. JAMA. 2011; 305(16):1677-1684.
6. McHugh RK, Barlow DH. The dissemination and implementation of evidencebased psychological treatments: a review of current efforts. Am Psychol. 2010; 65(2):73-84.
7. Mukherjee D, Eagle KA. Improving quality of care in the real world: efficacy versus effectiveness? Am Heart J. 2003;146(6):946-947. (Pubitemid 37500766)
8. Mukherjee D. Continuous quality improvement initiatives in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: can we have our cake and eat it too? Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(8):429-430. (Pubitemid 44267080)
9. Tamblyn R, Battista R. Changing clinical practice: which Interventions work? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1993;13(4):233-288.
10. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of Interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ. 1995;153(10):1423-1431.
11. Roe MT, Messenger JC, Weintraub WS, et al. Treatments, trends, and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(4):254-263.
12. Spertus JA, Radford MJ, Every NR, Ellerbeck EF, Peterson ED, Krumholz HM; Acute Myocardial Infarction Working Group of the American Heart Association/ American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke. Challenges and opportunities in quantifying the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: summary from the Acute Myocardial Infarction Working Group of the American Heart Association/ American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(9):1653-1663. (Pubitemid 36543388)