Methyl jasmonate induced responses in four plant species and its effect on Spodoptera litura Fab. performance

Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 263-269

  Tan, Ching Wen ^a   Lo, Ju Che ^a   Yadav, Jitendra ^a   Ravuiwasa, Kaliova Tavou ^a   Hwang, Shaw Yhi ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHUNG HSING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Induced defense; Polyphenol oxidase; Relative growth rate; Tobacco cutworm; Trypsin inhibitor

Indexed keywords

CAPSICUM ANNUUM VAR. ANNUUM; IPOMOEA AQUATICA; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; NICOTIANA TABACUM; RAPHANUS SATIVUS; SPINACIA OLERACEA; SPODOPTERA LITURA;

EID: 79955456580     PISSN: 12268615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aspen.2011.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Agrawal A.A. Specificity of induced resistance in wild radish: causes and consequences for two specialist and two generalist caterpillars. Oikos 2000, 89:493-500.
2. Ament K., Kant M.R., Sabelis M.W., Haring M.A., Schuurink R.C. Jasmonic acid is a key regulator of spider mite-induced volatile terpenoid and methyl salicylate emission in tomato. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135:2025-2037.
3. Baldwin I.T. Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95:8113-8118.
4. Bennett R.N., Wallsgrove R.M. Secondary metabolites in plant defence mechanisms. New Phytol. 1994, 127:617-633.
5. Berenbaum M.R., Zangerl A.R. Facing the future of plant-insect interaction research: le retour à la "raison d'Être". Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:804-811.
6. Bergey D.R., Orozco-Cardenas M., de Moura D.S., Ryan C.A. A wound- and systemin-inducible polygalacturonase in tomato leaves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:1756-1760.
7. Bernays E.A., Chapman R.F. Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects 1994, Chapman and Hall, New York.
8. Bhonwong A., Stout M.J., Attajarusit J., Tantasawat P. Defensive role of tomato polyphenol oxidases against cotton bollworm (Helicoverpa armigera) and beet armyworm (Spodoptera exigua). J. Chem. Ecol. 2009, 35:28-38.
9. Bodenhausen N., Reymond P. Signaling pathways controlling induced resistance to insect herbivores in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant. Microbe. Interact. 2007, 20:1406-1420.
10. Bradford M.M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72:248-254.
11. Broadway R.M., Duffey S.S. The effect of plant protein quality on insect digestive physiology and the toxicity of plant proteinase inhibitors. J. Insect Physiol. 1988, 34:1111-1117.
12. Browse J.B., Howe G.A. New weapons and a rapid response against insect attack. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:832-838.
13. Chen H., Gonzales-Vigil E., Wilkerson C.G., Howe G.A. Stability of plant defense proteins in the gut of insect herbivores. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:1954-1967.
14. Chen H., Wilkerson C.G., Kuchar J.A., Phinney B.S., Howe G.A. Jasmonate-inducible plant enzymes degrade essential amino acids in the herbivore midgut. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:19237-19242.
15. Cipollini D.F., Sipe M.L. Jasmonic acid treatment and mammalian herbivory differentially affect chemical defenses and growth of wild mustard (Brassica kaber). Chemoecology 2001, 11:137-143.
16. Constabel C.P., Barbehenn R. Defensive role of polyphenol oxidase in plants. Induced Plant Resistance to Herbivory 2008, 253-269. Springer Science+Business Media. A. Schaller (Ed.).
17. Constabel C.P., Bergey D.R., Ryan C.A. Systemin activities synthesis of wound-inducible tomato leaf polyphenol oxidase via the octadecanoid defense signaling pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995, 92:407-411.
18. Constabel C.P., Ryan C.A. A survey of wound- and methyl jasmonate-induced leaf polyphenol oxidase in crop plants. Phytochemistry 1998, 47:507-511.
19. De Moraes C.M., Lewis W.J., Paré P.W., Alborn H.T., Tumlinson J.H. Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 1998, 393:570-573.
20. Dicke M., Hilker M. Induced plant defences: from molecular biology to evolutionary ecology. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2003, 4:3-14.
21. Dicke M., Takabayashi J., Posthumus M.A., Schütte C., Krips O.E. Plant-phytoseiid interactions mediated by herbivore-induced plant volatiles: variation in production of cues and in responses of predatory mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 1998, 22:311-333.
22. Duffey S.S., Felton G.W. Enzymatic antinutritive defenses of the tomato plant against insects. Naturally Occurring Pest Bioregulators 1991, 167-197. ACS Press, Washington, DC. P.A. Hedin (Ed.).
23. Duffey S.S., Stout M.J. Antinutritive and toxic compounds of plant defense against insects. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 1996, 32:3-37.
24. Farmer E.E., Johnson R.R., Ryan C.A. Regulation of expression of proteinase inhibitor genes by methyl jasmonate and jasmonic acid. Plant Physiol. 1992, 98:995-1002.
25. Farmer E.E., Ryan C.A. Interplant communication: airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87:7713-7716.
26. Felton G.W., Summers C.B., Muller A.J. Oxidative responses in soybean foliage to herbivory by bean leaf beetle and three-cornered alfalfa hopper. J. Chem. Ecol. 1994, 20:639-649.
27. Felton G.W. Nutritive quality of plant protein: sources of variation and insect herbivore responses. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 1996, 32:107-130.
28. Felton G.W. Indigestion is a plant's best defense. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:18771-18772.
29. Fritz H. Foreword. Proteases as Targets for Therapy 2000, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, ch. V-VI. K. von der Helm, B.D. Korant, J.C. Cheronis (Eds.).
30. Gupta G.P., Rani S., Birah A., Raghuraman M. Improved artificial diet for mass rearing of the tobacco caterpillar, Spodoptera litura (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2005, 25:55-58.
31. Harrison M.J. Signaling in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 59:19-42.
32. Joem M., Muthukumaran N. Role of certain elicitors on the chemical induction of resistance in tomato against the leaf caterpillar Spodoptera litura Fab. Not. Bot. Hort. Agrobot. Cluj. 2008, 36:71-75.
33. Johnson M.T.J., Agrawal A.A. Plant genotype and environment interact to shape a diverse arthropod community on evening primrose (Oenothera biennis). Ecology 2005, 86:874-885.
34. Kaplan I., Halitschke R., Kessler A., Rehill B.J., Sardanelli S., Denno R.F. Physiological integration of roots and shoots in plant defense strategies links above- and belowground herbivory. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:841-851.
35. Karban R., Baldwin I.T. Induced Responses to Herbivory 1997, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
36. Karban R., Myers J.H. Induced plant response to herbivory. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1989, 20:331-348.
37. Kessler A., Baldwin I.T. Defensive function of herbivore-induced plant volatile emissions in nature. Science 2001, 291:2141-2144.
38. Koiwa H., Bressan R.A., Hasegawa P.M. Regulation of protease inhibitors and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. 1997, 2:379-384.
39. Koornneef A., Pieterse C.M.J. Cross talk in defense signaling. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:839-844.
40. Lee T.M., Lin Y.H. Trypsin inhibitor and trypsin-like protease activity in air- or submergence rice (Oryza sativa L.) coleoptiles. Plant Sci. 1995, 106:43-54.
41. Mattson W.J. Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1980, 11:119-161.
42. Moran P.J. Plant-mediated interactions between insects and a fungal plant pathogen and the role of plant chemical responses to infection. Oecologia 1998, 115:523-530.
43. Orozco-Cardenas M., McGurl B., Ryan C.A. Expression of an antisense prosystemin gene in tomato plants reduces resistance toward Manduca sexta larvae. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90:8273-8276.
44. Pearce G., Strydom D., Johnson S., Ryan C.A. A polypeptide from tomato leaves induces wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor proteins. Science 1991, 253:895-897.
45. Poelman E.H., Broekgaarden C., van Loon J.J.A., Dicke M. Early season herbivore differentially affects plant defence responses to subsequently colonizing herbivores and their abundance in the field. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17:3352-3365.
46. Ryan C.A. Protease inhibitors in plants: genes for improving defenses against insects and pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1990, 28:425-449.
47. Ryan J.D., Gregory P., Tingey W.M. Phenolic oxidase activities in glandular trichomes of Solanum berthaultii. Phytochemistry 1982, 21:1885-1887.
48. Ryan C.A., Pearce G. Systemins: a functionally defined family of peptide signal that regulate defensive genes in Solanaceae species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:14577-14580.
49. Schoonhoven L.M., van LOON J.J.A., Dicke M. Insect-Plant Biology 2005, Oxford University Press, New York. 2 ed.
50. Soler R., Bezemer T.M., van Der Putten W.H., Vet L.E.M., Harvey J.A.J. Root herbivore effects on above-ground herbivore, parasitoid and hyperparasitoid performance via changes in plant quality. J. Anim. Ecol. 2005, 74:1121-1130.
51. Steppuhn A., Baldwin I.T. Resistance management in a native plant: nicotine prevents herbivores from compensating for plant protease inhibitors. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:499-551.
52. Stout M.J., Duffey S.S. Characterization of induced resistance in tomato plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1996, 79:273-283.
53. Stout M.J., Fidantsef A.L., Duffey S.S., Bostock R.M. Signal interactions in pathogen and insect attack: systemic plant-mediated interactions between pathogens and herbivores of the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 1999, 54:115-130.
54. Stout M.J., Workman K.V., Bostock R.M., Duffey S.S. Stimulation and attenuation of induced resistance by elicitors and inhibitors of chemical induction in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) foliage. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1998, 86:267-279.
55. Stout M.J., Workman K.V., Bostock R.M., Duffey S.S. Specificity of induced resistance in the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum. Oecologia 1998, 113:74-81.
56. Thaler J.S. Jasmonate-inducible plant defenses cause increased parasitism of herbivores. Nature 1999, 399:686-688.
57. Thaler J.S., Stout M.J., Karban R., Duffey S.S. Exogenous jasmonates simulate insect wounding in tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in the laboratory and field. J. Chem. Ecol. 1996, 22:1767-1781.
58. Thaler J.S., Stout M.J., Karban R., Duffey S.S. Jasmonate-mediated induced plant resistance affects a community of herbivores. Ecol. Entomol. 2001, 26:312-324.
59. Traw M.B., Dawson T.E. Reduced performance of two specialist herbivores (Lepidoptera: Pieridae, Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on new leaves of damaged black mustard plants. Environ. Entomol. 2002, 31:714-722.
60. van Dam N.M., Horn M., Mareš M., Baldwin I.T. Ontogeny constrains systemic protease inhibitor response in Nicotiana attenuate. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001, 27:547-568.
61. van Dam N.M., Oomen M.W. Root and shoot jasmonic acid applications differentially affect leaf chemistry and herbivore growth. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3:91-98.
62. van Schie C.C.N., Haring M.A., Schuurink R.C. Tomato linalool synthase is induced in trichomes by jasmonic acid. Plant Mol. Biol. 2007, 64:251-263.
63. Waldbauer G.P. The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv. Insect Physiol. 1968, 5:229-288.
64. Walker-Simmons M., Ryan C.A. Wound-induced accumulation of trypsin inhibitor activities in plant leaves. Plant Physiol. 1977, 59:437-439.
65. Zheng S.J., Dicke M. Ecological genomics of plant-insect interactions: from gene to community. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:812-817.
66. Zhu-Salzman K., Luthe D.S., Felton G.W. Arthropod-inducible proteins: broad spectrum defenses against multiple herbivores. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:852-858.