Geologic sequestration through EOR: Policy and regulatory considerations for greenhouse gas accounting

Energy Procedia

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 5794-5801

  McCoy, Sean T ^a   Pollak, Melisa ^b   Jaramillo, Paulina ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allocation; Boundary expansion; Emissions accounting; Enhanced oil recovery; Geologic sequestration; Life cycle assessment

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; CARBON CAPTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; EMISSION CONTROL; FOSSIL FUELS; GREENHOUSE GASES; HYDROGEOLOGY; LIFE CYCLE; OIL WELL FLOODING;

ALLOCATION; BOUNDARY EXPANSION; ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY; GEOLOGIC SEQUESTRATIONS; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA);

ENHANCED RECOVERY;

EID: 79955455132     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.576     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. 2 supply sources become available. Oil and Gas Journal, 2009. 107(45): p. 41-47.
2. McCoy, S.T. and E.S. Rubin, The effect of high oil prices on EOR project economics. Energy Procedia, 2009. 1(1): p. 4143-4150.
3. Marston, P.M. and P.A. Moore, From EOR to CCS: The Evolving Legal and Regulatory Framework for Carbon Capture and Storage. Energy Law Journal, 2008. 29(2): p. 421-490.
4. Hovorka, S.D., et al., Comparing carbon sequestration in an oil reservoir to sequestration in a brine formation- field study. Energy Procedia, 2009. 1(1): p. 2051-2056.
5. 2 in an Enhanced Oil Recovery System. Environmental Science and Technology, 2009. 43(21): p. 8027-8032.
6. International Energy Agency, Key World Energy Statistics 2009. 2009, OECD: Paris, France.
7. Blunt, M.F., F.J. Fayers, and F.M. Orr, Carbon Dioxide in Enhanced Oil Recovery. Energy Conversion and Management, 1993. 34(9-11): p. 1197-1204. (Pubitemid 23710180) (Pubitemid 23710180)
8. Moritis, G., More US EOR projects start but EOR production continues decline. Oil and Gas Journal, 2008. 106(15): p. 41-46.
9. 2 Transport by Pipeline and Storage in Saline Aquifers and Oil Reservoirs, in Engineering & Public Policy. 2008, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA. p. 267.
10. 2 with Enhanced Oil Recovery. 2008, National Energy Technology Laboratory: Pittsburgh, PA.
11. Kovscek, A.R. and Y. Wang, Geologic storage of carbon dioxide and enhanced oil recovery. I. Uncertainty quantification employing a streamline based proxy for reservoir flow simulation. Energy Conversion and Management, 2005. 46: p. 1920-1940.
12. Kovscek, A.R. and M.D. Cakici, Geologic storage of carbon dioxide and enhanced oil recovery. II. Cooptmization of storage and recovery. Energy Conversion and Management, 2005. 46: p. 1941-1956.
13. 2-EOR Technology. 2009, National Energy Technology Laboratory: Pittsburgh, PA.
14. DOE, DSIRE: Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency. 2010, U.S. Department of Energy.
15. Groenenberg, H., S. Bakker, and H. de Coninck, How to include CCS in the CDM? Baseline methodologies and institutional implications. 2008, Energy research center of the Netherlands.
16. Andress, D., T.D. Nguyen, and S. Das, Low-carbon fuel standard-Status and analytic issues. Energy Policy, 2010. 38(1): p. 580-591.
17. Morrow, W.R., et al., Analysis of Policies to Reduce Oil Consumption and Greenhouse-Gas Emissions from the U.S. Transportation Sector. 2010, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs: Cambridge, MA.