Fully coupled modeling of long term cement well seal stability in the presence of CO2

Energy Procedia

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 5162-5169

  Wilson, James C ^a   Benbow, Steven J ^a   Metcalfe, Richard ^a   Savage, David ^b   Walker, Colin S ^c   Chittenden, Neil ^a  

^a QUINTESSA LTD   (United Kingdom)

^b Savage Earth Associates Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^c JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cement; Coupled modelling; Risk assessment; Well seal

Indexed keywords

CEMENTS; DIGITAL STORAGE; GREENHOUSE GASES; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CEMENT CARBONATION; CEMENT DEGRADATIONS; DEMONSTRATION PROJECT; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM; FIELD OBSERVATIONS; FULLY-COUPLED MODEL; THERMODYNAMIC DATA;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

EID: 79955383644     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.493     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Special Report: Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
2. International Energy Agency (IEA). Geologic storage of carbon dioxide: staying safely underground. IEA; 2008.
3. 2 under the North Sea Basin - a key solution for combating climate change. Norwegian Ministry of Petroleum and Energy and UK Department of Trade and Industry, DTI/Pub URN 07/1023; 2007.
4. 2; 2010.
5. 2 under geological sequestration conditions. Environ. Sci. and Technol. 2007; 41: 4787-4792. (Pubitemid 47047422) (Pubitemid 47047422)
6. 2 exposure from the SACROC Unit, West Texas, USA. Int. J. Green. Gas Cont. 2007. 1: 75-85. (Pubitemid 46969902) (Pubitemid 46969902)
7. Berner UR. Modelling the incongruent dissolution of hydrated cement minerals, Radiochim. Acta 1988; 44/45: 387-393.
8. Kulik DA, Kersten M. Aqueous Solubility Diagrams for Cementitious Waste Stabilization Systems: II, End- Member Stoichiometries of Ideal Calcium Silicate Hydrate Solid Solutions. J. Am. Ceram. Soc 201; 84 (12): 3017-3026.
9. Lothenbach B, Matschei T, Moschner G, Glasser FP. Thermodynamic modelling of the effect of temperature on the hydration and porosity of Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2008; 38: 1-18. (Pubitemid 350110321) (Pubitemid 350110321)
10. Bethke CM. Geochemical and Biogeochemical Reaction Modelling, Cambridge University Press; 2008.
11. Duan Modelling Group. Interactive Online Models. http://www.geochem- model.org/models.htm (last accessed 25th August, 2010).
12. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ. User's guide to PHREEQC (version 2)-a computer program for speciation, batchreaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4259, US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Denver, Colorado, 1999.
13. Pitzer, KS. Thermodynamic model for aqueous solutions of liquid-like density. In: Thermodynamic Modeling of Geological Materials: Minerals, Fluids and Melts, Carmichael ISE, Eugster HP, editors. Mineralogical Society of America, Reviews in Mineralogy; 17: 47-142.
14. United States Department of Energy (USDOE). In-Drift Precipitates/Salts Model. ANL-EBS-MD-000045 REV 03; 2007.
15. Aagaard P, Helgeson HC. Thermodynamic and kinetic constraints on reaction rates among minerals and aqueous solutions. I. Theoretical considerations, American Journal of Science 1982; 282 (3): 237-285.
16. Palandri JL, Kharaka YK. A compilation of rate parameters of water-mineral interaction kinetics for application to geochemical modeling. US Geological Survey Open File Report 2004-1068; 2004.
17. th ed. Elsevier; 2003.
18. Quintessa. QPAC: Quintessa's general purpose modelling code, QRS-3000B-8 v1.0, Quintessa Limited, Henley-on-Thames, UK, 2008.