Reducing risk in basin scale sequestration: A bayesian model selection framework for improving detection

Energy Procedia

Volumn 4, Issue , 2011, Pages 4199-4206

  Seto, C J ^a   McRae, G J ^a  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Basin scale; Bayesian model selection; Integrated monitoring; Leakage detectection

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; GEOLOGY; GREENHOUSE GASES; MONITORING;

BACKGROUND CONCENTRATION; BASIN SCALE; BAYESIAN MODEL SELECTION; GEOLOGICAL SEQUESTRATION; GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION; HIGH-RESOLUTION MONITORING; INTEGRATED MONITORING; REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 79955382531     PISSN: 18766102     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.367     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Benson SM. Monitoring carbon dioxide sequestration in deep geological formation for inventory verification and carbon credits. Paper SPE 102883 presented at the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, San Antonio TX, 24-27 September 2006.
2. 2 geosequestration. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2, 401-14 (2008).
3. 2 movement during sequestration: Model studies. Geophys. 73, WA105-12 (2008).
4. 2 seepage from geological carbon sequestration sites. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2, 640-52 (2008).
5. th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Kyoto Japan, 2002.
6. thInternational Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Washington DC, 2008.
7. Tombari J. RE: Site Characterization Costs for GS, S. McCoy (ed.) Schlumberger Limited; 2007.
8. 2 Sequestration Technology and Cost Analysis: Technical Support Document. United States Environmental Protection Agency; 2008.
9. Central Federal Lands Highway Division. InSAR Applications for Highway Transportation Projects. United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; 2006.
10. Baker JM. Challenges and cautions in measuring evapotranspiration. Southwest Hydrology 1, 21-33 (2008).
11. 2 measurements from Harvard Forest. Available at: http://public.ornl.gov/ameriflux/Site-Info/siteInfo.cfm?KEYID=us.harvard- forest.01.
12. 2 in a depleted oil reservoir, New Mexico, USA. App. Geochem. 69, 406-14 (2004).
13. 2 observations. Geophys. Res. Letters 30, 2194-99 (2003).
14. Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes Factors and Model Uncertainty. J. Am. Stat. Association 90, 773-95 (1995).
15. rd ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1961.
16. 2 plume during carbon dioxide storage in saline aquifers: Storage efficiency for capillary trapping at the basin scale. Transp. Porous Media 82, 19-30 (2009).
17. 2 leaking from underground storage: Comparison of analytical solution with simulation. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 3, 422-30 (2009).
18. Gettings P. High precision gravity measurements: Techniques, software, and algorithms. Utah Geological Survey, University of Utah: Salt Lake City UT; 2010.