A comparison of multiple mini-interviews and structured interviews in a UK setting

Medical Teacher

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 397-402

  O'Brien, Aileen ^a   Harvey, Jake ^a   Shannon, Muriel ^a   Lewis, Kenton ^a   Valencia, Oswaldo ^a  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MALE; MEDICAL SCHOOL; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCHOOL ADMISSION CRITERIA; SCHOOLS, MEDICAL; SEX FACTORS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955379884     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.541532     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Basco WT, Gilbert GE, Chessman AW, Blue AV. 2000. The ability of a medical school admission process to predict clinical performance and patients' satisfaction. Acad Med 75:743-747. (Pubitemid 30619369)
2. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. 2004a. The ability of the multiple mini-interview to predict pre-clerkship performance in med-ical school. Acad Med 79:40-42.
3. Eva KW, Reiter HI, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. 2004b. The relationship between interviewers' characteristics and ratings assigned during a multiple mini-interview. Acad Med 79(6):602-609. (Pubitemid 38691488)
4. Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Reiter HI, Norman GR. 2004c. An admissions OSCE: The multiple min-interview. Med Educ 38:314-326.
5. Hughes P. 2002. Can we improve on how we select medical students? J R Soc Med 95:18-22. (Pubitemid 34098315)
6. James D, Yates J, Nicholson S. 2010. Comparison of A level and UKCAT performance in students applying to UK medical and dental schools in 2006: Cohort study. BMJ 340:c478.
7. LemayJ-F, LockyerJM, CollinVT, Brownell AKW. 2007. Assessment of non-cognitive traits through the admissions multiple mini-interview. Med Educ 41:573-579. (Pubitemid 46789581)
8. McDaniel MA, Whetzel DL, Schmidt FL, Mauer SD. 1994. The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 79:599-616.
9. Ones DS, Viswesvaran C, Schmidt FL. 1993. Monograph: Comprehensive meta-analysis if integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. J Appl Psychol 78:679-703.
10. Reiter HI, Eva KW, Rosenfeld J, Norman GR. 2007. Multiple mini-interviews predict clerkship and licensing examination performance. Med Educ 41:378-384. (Pubitemid 46569367)
11. Reiter HI, Salvatori P, Rosenfeld J, Trinh K, Eva KW. 2006. The effect of defined violations of test security on admissions outcomes using multiple mini-interviews. Med Educ 40:36-42.