Developmental stressors that impair song learning in males do not appear to affect female preferences for song complexity in the zebra finch

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 566-573

  Woodgate, Joseph L ^a   Leitner, Stefan ^b   Catchpole, Clive K ^c   Berg, Mathew L ^d   Bennett, Andrew T D ^d,e   Buchanan, Katherine L ^a,d  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

bird song; developmental stress; early environment; female choice; female condition; mate choice; mating preferences; sexual selection; Taeniopygia guttata; zebra finch

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; FEMALE BEHAVIOR; LEARNING; MATE CHOICE; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONGBIRD;

AVES; PASSERI; TAENIOPYGIA GUTTATA;

EID: 79955374948     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arr006     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Andersson M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
2. Arnold KE, Blount JD, Metcalfe NB, Orr KJ, Adam A, Houston D, Monaghan P. 2007. Sex-specific differences in compensation for poor neonatal nutrition in the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata. J Avian Biol. 38:356-366. (Pubitemid 46699592)
3. Ball GF, MacDougall-Shackleton SA. 2001. Sex differences in songbirds 25 years later: what have we learned and where do we go? Microsc Res Tech. 54:327-334. (Pubitemid 32847951)
4. Bennett ATD, Cuthill IC, Partridge JC, Maier EJ. 1996. Ultraviolet vision and mate choice in zebra finches. Nature. 380:433-435.
5. Birkhead TR, Fletcher F, Pellatt EJ. 1999. Nestling diet, secondary sexual traits and fitness in the zebra finch. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 266:385-390. (Pubitemid 29092576)
6. Bolhuis JJ, Gahr M. 2006. Neural mechanisms of birdsong memory. Nat Rev Neurosci. 7:347-357.
7. Bolhuis JJ, Zijlstra GGO, den Boer-Visser AM, Van der Zee EA. 2000. Localized neuronal activation in the zebra finch brain is related to the strength of song learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 97: 2282-2285. (Pubitemid 30134060)
8. Bolund E, Schielzeth H, Forstmeier W. 2010. No heightened condition dependence of zebra finch ornaments-a quantitative genetic approach. J Evol Biol. 23:586-597.
9. Brenowitz EA. 1991. Altered perception of species-specific song by female birds after lesions of a forebrain nucleus. Science. 251: 303-305.
10. Brumm H, Zollinger SA, Slater PJB. 2009. Developmental stress affects song learning but not song complexity and vocal amplitude in zebra finches. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 63:1387-1395.
11. Buchanan KL, Leitner S, Spencer KA, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2004. Developmental stress selectively affects the song control nucleus HVC in the zebra finch. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 271:2381-2386.
12. Buchanan KL, Spencer KA, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2003. Song as an honest signal of past developmental stress in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 270: 1149-1156. (Pubitemid 36683459)
13. Burley N, Coopersmith CB. 1987. Bill color preferences of zebra finches. Ethology. 76:133-151.
14. Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 2008. Bird song: biological themes and variations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Clayton NS. 1988. Song discrimination learning in zebra finches. Anim Behav. 36:1016-1024.
16. Clayton NS, Prove E. 1989. Song discrimination in female zebra finches and Bengalese finches. Anim Behav. 38:352-354.
17. Collins SA. 1999. Is female preference for male repertoires due to sensory bias? Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 266:2309-2314.
18. Cotton S, Small J, Pomiankowski A. 2006. Sexual selection and conditiondependent mate preferences. Curr Biol. 16:R755-R765. (Pubitemid 44691806)
19. Dawkins R, Krebs JR. 1978. Animal signals: information or manipulation? In: Krebs JR, Davies NB, editors. Behavioural ecology. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer. p. 282-309.
20. de Kloet ER. 2000. Stress in the brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 405:187-198.
21. Del Negro C, Gahr M, Leboucher G, Kreutzer M. 1998. The selectivity of sexual responses to song displays: effects of partial chemical lesion of the HVC in female canaries. Behav Brain Res. 96:151-159. (Pubitemid 28494132)
22. Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA. 2003a. Mate choice in the face of costly competition. Behav Ecol. 14:771-779. (Pubitemid 38126974)
23. Fawcett TW, Johnstone RA. 2003b. Optimal assessment of multiple cues. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 270:1637-1643. (Pubitemid 36960296)
24. Forstmeier W. 2005. Quantitative genetics and behavioural correlates of digit ratio in the zebra finch. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 272:2641-2649. (Pubitemid 41796569)
25. Gentner TQ, Hulse SH. 2000. Female European starling preference and choice for variation in conspecific male song. Anim Behav. 59:443-458. (Pubitemid 30656501)
26. Gil D, Naguib M, Riebel K, Rutstein A, Gahr M. 2006. Early condition, song learning, and the volume of song brain nuclei in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). J Neurobiol. 66:1602-1612. (Pubitemid 46005370)
27. Gobes SMH, Bolhuis JJ. 2007. Birdsong memory: a neural dissociation between song recognition and production. Curr Biol. 17:789-793. (Pubitemid 46635116)
28. Halle F, Gahr M, Pieneman AW, Kreutzer M. 2002. Recovery of song preferences after excitotoxic HVC lesion in female canaries. J Neurobiol. 52:1-13. (Pubitemid 34666125)
29. Hardling R, Kokko H. 2005. The evolution of prudent choice. Evol Ecol Res. 7:697-715. (Pubitemid 40832045)
30. Hebets EA, Wesson J, Shamble PS. 2008. Diet influences mate choice selectivity in adult female wolf spiders. Anim Behav. 76:355-363.
31. Holveck MJ, de Castro ACV, Lachlan RF, ten Cate C, Riebel K. 2008. Accuracy of song syntax learning and singing consistency signal early condition in zebra finches. Behav Ecol. 19:1267-1281.
32. Holveck MJ, Riebel K. 2007. Preferred songs predict preferred males: consistency and repeatability of zebra finch females across three test contexts. Anim Behav. 74:297-309. (Pubitemid 47247649)
33. Holveck MJ, Riebel K. 2010. Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 277:153-160.
34. Hunt J, Brooks R, Jennions MD. 2005. Female mate choice as a condition-dependent life-history trait. Am Nat. 166:79-92. (Pubitemid 40886775)
35. Jennions MD, Petrie M. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 72:283-327. (Pubitemid 27207611)
36. Leitner S, Catchpole CK. 2002. Female canaries that respond and discriminate more between male songs of different quality have a larger song control nucleus (HVC) in the brain. J Neurobiol. 52:294-301. (Pubitemid 34925385)
37. Lemon WC. 1993. The energetics of lifetime reproductive success in the zebra finch, Taeniopygia guttata. Physiol Zool. 66:946-963. (Pubitemid 2022257)
38. MacDonald IF, Kempster B, Zanette L, MacDougall-Shackleton SA. 2006. Early nutritional stress impairs development of a song-control brain region in both male and female juvenile song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) at the onset of song learning. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 273:2559-2564. (Pubitemid 44439678)
39. MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Dindia L, Newman AEM, Potvin DA, Stewart KA, MacDougall-Shackleton EA. 2009. Stress, song and survival in sparrows. Biol Lett. 5:746-748.
40. McEwen BS, Sapolsky RM. 1995. Stress and cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 5:205-216.
41. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P. 2001. Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol. 16:254-260. (Pubitemid 32288153)
42. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P. 2003. Growth versus lifespan: perspectives from evolutionary ecology. Exp Gerontol. 38:935-940. (Pubitemid 37040795)
43. Miller DB. 1979. Long-term recognition of father's song by female zebra finches. Nature. 280:389-391.
44. Naguib M, Heim C, Gil D. 2008. Early developmental conditions and male attractiveness in zebra finches. Ethology. 114:255-261. (Pubitemid 351248579)
45. Nottebohm F, Arnold AP. 1976. Sexual dimorphism in vocal control areas of the songbird brain. Science. 194:211-213.
46. Nowicki S, Peters S, Podos J. 1998. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am Zool. 38:179-190.
47. Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Peters S. 2002a. Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the "nutritional stress hypothesis". J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 188:1003-1014. (Pubitemid 36251493)
48. Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Peters S. 2002b. Quality of song learning affects female response to male bird song. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 269:1949-1954.
49. Qvarnstrom A, Part T, Sheldon BC. 2000. Adaptive plasticity in mate preference linked to differences in reproductive effort. Nature. 405:344-347. (Pubitemid 30337066)
50. Riebel K. 2000. Early exposure leads to repeatable preferences for male song in female zebra finches. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 267:2553-2558. (Pubitemid 32099448)
51. Riebel K. 2009. Song and female mate choice in zebra finches: a review. Adv Study Behav. 40:197-238.
52. Riebel K, Naguib M, Gil D. 2009. Experimental manipulation of the rearing environment influences adult female zebra finch song preferences. Anim Behav. 78:1397-1404.
53. Riebel K, Slater PJB. 1998. Testing female chaffinch song preferences by operant conditioning. Anim Behav. 56:1443-1453. (Pubitemid 29049736)
54. Riebel K, Smallegange IM, Terpstra NJ, Bolhuis JJ. 2002. Sexual equality in zebra finch song preference: evidence for a dissociation between song recognition and production learning. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 269:729-733. (Pubitemid 34407381)
55. Roberts ML, Buchanan KL, Bennett ATD, Evans MR. 2007. Mate choice in zebra finches: does corticosterone play a role? Anim Behav. 74:921-929. (Pubitemid 47538519)
56. Schielzeth H, Bolund E, Forstmeier W. 2010. Heritability of and early environment effects on variation in mating preferences. Evolution. 64:998-1006.
57. Spencer KA, Buchanan KL, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2003. Song as an honest signal of developmental stress in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Horm Behav. 44:132-139. (Pubitemid 37108635)
58. Spencer KA, Buchanan KL, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2004. Developmental stress, social rank and song complexity in the European starling (Stumus vulgaris). Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 271:S121-S123. (Pubitemid 38186928)
59. Spencer KA, Buchanan KL, Leitner S, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2005. Parasites affect song complexity and neural development in a songbird. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. 272:2037-2043. (Pubitemid 41416038)
60. Spencer KA, Wimpenny JH, Buchanan KL, Lovell PG, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2005. Developmental stress affects the attractiveness of male song and female choice in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 58:423-428. (Pubitemid 41033784)
61. Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC. 1994. Preference for symmetrical males by female zebra finches. Nature. 367:165-166.
62. Terpstra NJ, Bolhuis JJ, den Boer-Visser AM. 2004. An analysis of the neural representation of birdsong memory. J Neurosci. 24: 4971-4977. (Pubitemid 38697830)
63. Vyas A, Harding C, Borg L, Bogdan D. 2009. Acoustic characteristics, early experience, and endocrine status interact to modulate female zebra finches' behavioral responses to songs. Horm Behav. 55: 50-59.
64. Widemo F, Saether SA. 1999. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of variation in mating preferences. Trends Ecol Evol. 14:26-31. (Pubitemid 29124006)
65. Williams H. 2001. Choreography of song, dance and beak movements in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). J Exp Biol. 204: 3497-3506. (Pubitemid 34861328)
66. Woodgate JL, Bennett ATD, Leitner S, Catchpole CK, Buchanan KL. 2010. Developmental stress and female mate choice behaviour in the zebra finch. Anim Behav. 79:1381-1390.
67. Zann RA. 1996. The zebra finch: a synthesis of field and laboratory studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
68. Zann RA, Cash E. 2008. Developmental stress impairs song complexity but not learning accuracy in non-domesticated zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 62:391-400. (Pubitemid 350292568)