James I's homosexuality and the revision of the Folio text of King Lear

Notes and Queries

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 62-64

  Hammond, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955356639     PISSN: 00293970     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nq/44.1.62     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. See particularly Roger Warren, 'The Folio Omission of the Mock Trial: Motives and Consequences', in The Division of the Kingdoms: Shakespeare's Two Versions of 'King Lear', ed. Gary Taylor and Michael Warren (Oxford, 1983), 45-57;
2. Ann R. Meyer, 'Shakespeare's Art and the Texts of King Lear, Studies in Bibliography, xlvii (1994), 128-46;
3. and Robert Clare, '"Who is it that can tell me who I am?": The Theory of Authorial Revision between the Quarto and Folio Texts of King Lear', The Library, xvii (1995), 34-59.
4. Gary Taylor, 'Monopolies, Show Trials, Disaster, and Invasion: King Lear and Censorship' in The Division of the Kingdoms, 75-119.
5. King Lear 1608 (Pied Bull Quarto), Shakespeare Quarto Facsimiles, 1 (London, 1939), sig. G3.
6. Paul Hammond, Love Between Men in English Literature (Basingstoke, 1996), especially p. 31.
7. The Faithful Friends, Malone Society Reprint (Oxford, 1975), 6.
8. Janet Clare, 'Art made tongue-tied by authority': Elizabethan and Jacobean Dramatic Censorship (Manchester, 1990), 108, 200.
9. John Marston, The Malcontent, ed. George K Hunter (London, 1975), xxvii-xxx, 21. Dr Martin Butler kindly drew my attention to this example.
10. Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies (London, 1623), 299 (III.vi.9-14).