Reforming the European social model and the politics of indicators: From the unemployment rate to the employment rate in the European employment strategy

Unwrapping the European Social Model

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 189-212

  Salais, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS SACLAY   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955219330     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Aucouturier, A.-L. (1993) ‘Contribution à la mesure de l’efficacité de la politique de l’emploi’, Travail et Emploi, 55, January, pp 20-9.
2. Aucouturier, A.-L. (1998) ‘Evaluation des politiques d’emploi et action publique: l’exemple de l’aide aux chômeurs créateurs d’entreprise’, Thesis, University of Paris X Nanterre.
3. Benarrosh, Y. (2000) ‘Tri des chômeurs: le nécessaire consensus des acteurs de l’emploi’, Travail et Emploi, 81, January, pp 9-25.
4. Canceill, G. and Huyghues-Despointes, H. (1999) ‘L’inscription à l’ANPE et après: itinéraires de chômeurs’, Premières Synthèses, DARES, vol 37, no 1.
5. de la Porte, C. and Pochet, P. (2002) ‘Supple coordination at EU level and the key actors’ involvement’, in C. de la Porte and P. Pochet (eds) Building Social Europe through the Open Method of Coordination, Bruxelles: PIE-Peter Lang, pp. 27-68.
6. de la Porte, C. and Pochet, P. (2005) ‘Participation in the Open Method of Coordination: the cases of employment and social exclusion’, in J. Zeitlin and P. Pochet (eds) The Open Method of Coordination in action The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, Brussels: PIEPeter Lang, pp. 210-40.
7. EMCO (Employment Committee) (2004) ‘Indicators Group report to EMCO on progress made in the field of indicators to monitor the employment guidelines’, 22, 13 July, Brussels: EMCO.
8. European Commission (2002a) Joint Employment Report 2002, http://europe.eu.int/comm/employment_social/employment_strategy)
9. European Commission (2002b) ‘Taking stock of five years of the European Employment Strategy’, COM(2002)416 final, Communication, Brussels: European Commission.
10. Hodson, D. and Maher, I. (2001) ‘The Open Method as a new mode of governance: the case of soft economic policy coordination, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol 39, no 4, pp 719-45.
11. Martinon, S. (2002) ‘Les enjeux du suivi individualisé des chômeurs et la mise en place du PAP: le cas d’une agence locale pour l’emploi’, DEA Dissertation, University of Paris X Nanterre.
12. Rudischhauser, S. and Zimmermann, B. (2004) ‘De la critique à l’expertise: la ‘modernisation’ de l’action publique: le cas du chômage en France et en Allemagne’, in B. Zimmermann (ed) Les sciences sociales à l’épreuve de l’action: Le savant, le politique et l’Europe, Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme, pp. 247-85.
13. Salais, R. (1980) ‘Le chômage, un phénomène de file d’attente’, Economie et Statistique, no 123, July, pp. 67-78.
14. Salais, R. and Villeneuve, R. (eds) (2004) Europe and the politics of capabilities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Salais, R., Raveaud, G. and Grégoire, M. (2002) ‘L’évaluation de l’impact de la Stratégie Européenne pour l’Emploi - thème 10: Elaboration des politiques’, Unpublished report for the DARES, IDHE, Paris.
16. Teague, P. (2001) ‘Deliberative governance and EU social policy’, European Journal of Industrial Relations, vol 7, no 1, pp 7-26.
17. Tronti, L. (2001) ‘Fruitful or fashionable? Can benchmarking improve the employment performance of national labour markets?', in E. Best and D. Bossaert (eds) From Luxemburg to Lisbon and beyond: Making the Employment Strategy work, Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration, pp. 67-83.
18. Trubek, D. and Mosher, J. (2003) ‘New governance, EU employment policy and the European Social Model’, in D. Trubek and J. Zeitlin (eds) Governing work and welfare in a new economy: European and American experiments, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33-58.
19. Zeitlin, J. (2002) ‘The Open Method of Coordination and the future of the European Employment Strategy’, Presentation, Audition at the Employment and Social Affairs Committee of the European Parliament, Strasbourg, 8 July.
20. Zeitlin, J. (2005) ‘The Open Method of Coordination in action: theoretical promises, empirical realities, reform strategy’, in D. Zeitlin and P. Pochet, with L. Magnusson (eds) The Open Method of Coordination in action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies, Brussels, PIE-Peter Lang, pp. 447-503.