The new problem of distance in morality

The Ethics of Assistance: Morality and the Distant Needy

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 59-74

  Kamm, F M ^a  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955206248     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511817663.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (8)

1. “Peter Singer’s Ethical Theory and the Problem of Distance in Morality” in Singer and His Critics, ed. D. Jamieson (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).
2. “Does Distance Matter Morally to the Duty to Rescue, ” Law and Philosophy 19: 6 (November 2000), 655-81.
3. Morality, Mortality, Vol. II (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).
4. “Nonconsequentialism, ” in The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory, ed.Hugh La Follette (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000).
5. Peter Singer, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Philosophy & Public Affairs (1971).
6. “Supererogation and Obligation,” Journal of Philosophy 82: 3 (March 1985), 118-38.
7. Violetta Igneski, “Distance, Determinacy and the Duty to Aid: A Reply to Kamm,” Law and Philosophy, 20 (2001), 605-16.
8. Igneski, “Distance, Determinacy and the Duty to Aid,” 612.