An integrated approach to surgical audit

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 81, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 313-314

  Tran, Phong ^a   Morrison, Stewart G ^a   Lade, Justin A ^a   Haw, Chris S ^a  

^a WESTERN HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL AUDIT; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; STATISTICS; SURGERY; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

DATA COLLECTION; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; VICTORIA;

EID: 79955164944     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2011.05702.x     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Watters DA, Green AJ, van Rij A. Guidelines for surgical audit in Australia and New Zealand. ANZ J. Surg. 2006; 76: 78-83.
2. Smyth J. Surgical audit. I. Med. J. Aust. 1959; 46: 313-4.
3. Veen EJ, Janssen-Heijnen ML, Leenen LP, Roukema JA. The registration of complications in surgery: a learning curve. World J. Surg. 2005; 29: 402-9.
4. Green AJ, Smith J, van Rij A etal. Surgical Audit and Peer Review. Royal Australiasian College of Surgeons. 2008. [Cited 10 Sep 2010.] Available from URL:
5. Hanauer DA, Englesbe MJ, Cowan JA, Campbell DA. Informatics and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: automated processes could replace manual record review. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2009; 208: 37-41.
6. Colledge DN, White S. Computer-based surgical audit programs: a review of three current options. Aust. N Z J. Surg. 1997; 67: 206-10.
7. Bourke B. Australasian Vascular Audit. ANZSVS Audit/CPD committee 2009. [Cited 15 Jul 2010.] Available from URL:
8. Keller RB, Rudicel SA, Liang MH. Outcomes research in orthopaedics. Instr. Course Lect. 1994; 43: 599-611.