Towards identifying arguments in Wikipedia pages

Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, WWW 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 117-118

  Sepehri Rad, Hoda ^a   Barbosa, Denilson ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

argument; controversy; evaluation; Wikipedia

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENT; AUTOMATIC EVALUATION; CONTROVERSY; EVALUATION; HUMAN KNOWLEDGE; OPEN ENVIRONMENT; WIKIPEDIA;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 79955163045     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1963192.1963252     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (3)

1. U. Brandes, P. Kenis, J. Lerner, and D. van Raaij. Network analysis of collaboration structure in wikipedia. In WWW '09, pages 731-740, 2009.
2. A. Kittur, B. Suh, B. A. Pendleton, and E. H. Chi. He says, she says: conflict and coordination in wikipedia. In CHI '07, pages 453-462, 2007.
3. B.-Q. Vuong, E.-P. Lim, A. Sun, M.-T. Le, and H. W. Lauw. On ranking controversies in wikipedia: models and evaluation. In WSDM '08, pages 171-182, 2008.