Dietary self-care in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Report from the Juvenile diabetes and dietary study

Canadian Journal of Diabetes

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 39-45

  Austin, Stéphanie ^a   Senécal, Caroline ^a   Guay, Frédéric ^a   Nouwen, Arie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adolescents; Dietary self care; Metabolic control; Motivation; Type 1 diabetes

Indexed keywords

GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN;

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC DIET; FEMALE; FOOD INTAKE; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METABOLIC REGULATION; MOTIVATION; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PLEASURE; SCHOOL CHILD; SELF CARE; SEX DIFFERENCE;

EID: 79955162806     PISSN: 14992671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1499-2671(11)51007-X     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Health Canada. Eating Well with Canada's Food Guide. Ottawa, ON: Health Canada; 2007. http://www.healthcanada.gc.ca/foodguide. Accessed January 21, 2011.
2. Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Canadian Diabetes Association 2008 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes. 2008;32(suppl 1):S1-S201.
3. Delamater AM. Critical issues in the assessment of regimen adherence in children with diabetes. In: Drotar D, ed. Promoting Adherence to Medical Treatment in Chronic Childhood Illness. Florence, KY: Psychology Press; 2000:150-170.
4. Johns C, Faulkner MS, Quinn L. Characteristics of adolescents with type 1 diabetes who exhibit adverse outcomes. Diabetes Educ. 2008;34:874-885.
5. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. Effect of intensive diabetes treatment on the development and progression of long-term complications in adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. J Pediatr. 1994;125:177-188.
6. Levine BS, Anderson BJ, Butler DA, et al. Predictors of glycemic control and short-term adverse outcomes in youth with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr. 2001;139:197-203.
7. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inquiry. 2000;11:227-268.
8. Senecal C, Nouwen A, White D. Motivation and dietary self-care in adults with diabetes: are self-efficacy and autonomous self-regulation complementary or competing constructs? Health Psychol. 2000;19:452-457.
9. Williams GC, McGregor HA, Zeldman A, et al. Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management. Health Psychol. 2004;23:58-66.
10. Senecal C, Guay F, Nouwen A. The Juvenile Diabetes and Dietary Study (JDDS). Quebec, Canada: Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2002-2006.
11. Toobert D, Glasgow RE. Assessing diabetes self-management: the summary of diabetes self-care activities questionnaire. In: Bradley C, ed. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: A Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice. Florence, KY: Psychology Press; 1994:351-374.
12. Nouwen A, Law GU, Hussain S, et al. Comparison of the role of selfefficacy and illness representations in relation to dietary self-care and diabetes distress in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Psychol Health. 2009;24:1071-1084.
13. Rabiau MA, Knauper B, Nguyen TK, et al. Compensatory beliefs about glucose testing are associated with low adherence to treatment and poor metabolic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Health Educ Res. 2009;24:890-896.
14. Skinner TC, Hampson SE. Social support and personal models of diabetes in relation to self-care and well-being in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Adolesc. 1998;21:703-715.
15. Austin S, Senecal C, Fernet C, et al. Development and validation of the Dietary Self-Care Motivation Scale for Adolescents with Diabetes (DSMSAD). Poster session presented at the 2nd International Conference on Self-Determination Theory, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2004.
16. Robins RR. An Assessment of Perceptions of Parental Autonomy Support and Control: Child and Parent Correlates [Doctoral dissertation]. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester; 1994.
17. Rosilio M, Cotton JB, Wieliczko MC, et al. Factors associated with glycemic control. A cross-sectional nationwide study in 2,579 French children with type 1 diabetes. The French Pediatric Diabetes Group. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:1146-1153.
18. Anderson B, Ho J, Brackett J, et al. Parental involvement in diabetes management tasks: relationships to blood glucose monitoring adherence and metabolic control in young adolescents with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Pediatr. 1997;130:257-265.
19. American Diabetes Association. Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(suppl 1):S48-S65.
20. Bishop FK, Maahs DM, Spiegel G, et al. The carbohydrate counting in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (CCAT) study. Diabetes Spectrum. 2009;22:56-62.
21. Story M, Neumark-Sztainer D, French S. Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviors. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102 (suppl 3):S40-S51.
22. Wolpert HA, Anderson BJ. Management of diabetes: are doctors framing the benefits from the wrong perspective? BMJ. 2001;323:994-996.
23. Julien E, Senecal C, Guay F. Longitudinal relations among perceived autonomy support from health care practitioners, motivation, coping strategies, and dietary adherence in a sample of adults with type 2 diabetes. J Health Psychol. 2009;14:457-470.
24. Anderson BJ, Coyne JC. "Miscarried helping" in the interactions between chronically ill children and their parents. In: Johnson JH, Johnson SB, eds. Advances in Child Health Psychology. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida; 1991:167-177.
25. Williams GC, McGregor HA, King D, et al. Variation in perceived competence, glycemic control, and patient satisfaction: relationship to autonomy support from physicians. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:39-45.