Frames of reference for biological motion and face perception

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2010, Pages

  Chang, Dorita H F ^a   Harris, Laurence R ^b   Troje, Nikolaus F ^a,b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Biological motion; Face perception; Reference frames

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTION; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955156206     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.6.22     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bertenthal, B. I., & Pinto, J. (1994). Global processing of biological motions. Psychological Science, 5, 221-225.
2. Bingham, G. P., Schmidt, R. C., & Rosenblum, L. D. (1995). Dynamics and the orientation of kinematic forms in visual event recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1473-1493.
3. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
4. Chang, D. H. F., & Troje, N. F. (2009a). Acceleration carries the local inversion effect in biological motion perception. Journal of Vision, 9(1):19, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/1/19, doi:10.1167/9.1.19.
5. Chang, D. H. F., & Troje, N. F. (2009b). Characterizing global and local mechanisms in biological motion perception. Journal of Vision, 9(5):8, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/5/8, doi:10.1167/9.5.8.
6. Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L. A. (2000). The faceinversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29, 159-170.
7. Howard, I. P. (1982). Human visual orientation. New York: Wiley.
8. Indovina, I., Maffei, V., Bosco, G., Zago, M., Macaluso, E., & Lacquaniti, F. (2005). Representation of visual gravitational motion in the human vestibular cortex. Science, 308, 416-419.
9. Jokisch, D., & Troje, N. F. (2003). Biological motion as a cue for the perception of size. Journal of Vision, 3(4):1, 252-264, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/3/4/1, doi:10.1167/3.4.1.
10. Kohler, I. (1940). Dynamics in psychology. New York: Liveright.
11. Kushiro, K., Taga, G., & Watanabe, H. (2007). Frame of reference for visual perception in young infants during change of body position. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 523-529.
12. Lobmaier, J. S., & Mast, F. W. (2007). The Thatcher illusion: Rotating the viewer instead of the picture. Perception, 36, 537-546.
13. Lopez, C., Bachofner, C.,Mercier,M., & Blanke, O. (2009). Gravity and observer's body orientation influence the visual perception of human body postures. Journal of Vision, 9(5):1, 1-14, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/5/1, doi:10.1167/9.5.1.
14. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
15. Pittenger, J. B. (1985). Estimation of pendulum length from information in motion. Perception, 14, 247-256.
16. Rock, I. (1973). Orientation and form. New York: Academic Press.
17. Rock, I. (1988). On Thompson's inverted-face phenomenon. Perception, 17, 815-817.
18. Runeson, S., & Frykholm, G. (1981). Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 733-740.
19. Shipley, T. F. (2003). The effect of object and event orientation on perception of biological motion. Psychological Science, 14, 377-380.
20. Stappers, P. J., & Waller, P. E. (1993). Using the free fall of objects under gravity for visual depth estimation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31, 125-127.
21. Sumi, S. (1984). Upside-down presentation of the Johansson moving light-spot pattern. Perception, 13, 283-286.
22. Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9, 483-484.
23. Troje, N. F. (2002). Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Journal of Vision, 2(5):2, 371-387, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/2/5/2, doi:10.1167/2.5.2.
24. Troje, N. F. (2003). Reference frames for orientation anisotropies in face recognition and biological-motion perception. Perception, 32, 201-210.
25. Troje, N. F., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
26. Troje, N. F., & Westhoff, C. (2006). The inversion effect in biological motion perception: Evidence for a "life detector?" Current Biology, 16, 821-824.
27. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion on face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471-491.