Selecting and scaling real ground motion records using harmony search algorithm

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 941-953

  Haydar Kayhan, Ali ^a   Armagan Korkmaz, Kasim ^b   Irfanoglu, Ayhan ^c  

^a PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; DESIGN SPECTRUM; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EUROCODES; GROUND MOTIONS; HARMONY SEARCH; HARMONY SEARCH ALGORITHMS; METAHEURISTIC; PRE-SELECTED; SITE CONDITIONS; SOIL TYPES; SOLUTION ALGORITHMS; SOLUTION MODEL; STRONG MOTION;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; DESIGN; LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

GEOLOGIC MODELS;

ALGORITHM; DATABASE; GROUND MOTION; HEURISTICS; META-ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; SEISMIC DESIGN; SITE EFFECT; SOIL DYNAMICS; STRONG MOTION; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 79955154231     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Iervolino I., Maddaloni G., Cosenza E. Eurocode 8 compliant real record sets for seismic analysis of structures. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2008, 12(1):54-90.
2. Iervolino I., Maddaloni G., Cosenza E. A note on selection of time-histories for seismic analysis of bridges in Eurocode 8. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2009, 13(8):1125-1152.
3. Katsanos E.I., Sextos A.G., Manolis G.D. Selection of earthquake ground motion records: a state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2010, 30:157-169.
4. Abrahamson NA. Non-stationary spectral matching program RSPMATCH. User Manual. 1993.
5. Bommer J.J., Acevedo A.B. The use of real earthquake accelerograms as input to dynamic analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2004, Special Issue 8(1):43-91.
6. Boore D.M. Simulation of ground-motion using the stochastic method. Pure and Applied Geophysics 2003, 160:635-676.
7. Iervolino I., Galasso C., Cosenza E. REXEL: computer aided record selection for code-based seismic structural analysis. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2010, 8:339-362.
8. Eurocode-8: Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures, Part 1.1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. European Committee for Standardization, 2003.
9. Turkish Earthquake Code: Regulations on structures constructed in earthquake regions. Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey, 2007.
10. ASCE. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE standard no. 007-05, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2006.
11. Bolt BA, Gregor NJ. Synthesized strong ground motions for the seismic condition assessment of the eastern portion of the San Francisco Bay Bridge. Report UCB/EERC-93/12, University of California, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, 1993.
12. Carballo JE, Cornell CA. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis: spectrum matching and design. Report no. RMS-41, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, 2000.
13. Department of the Army. Dynamic analysis of concrete hydraulic structures. Circular no. EC 1110-2-6051, Washington, DC, 2000.
14. Silva W, Lee K. State-of-the-art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States. Report 24, WES RASCAL code for synthesizing earthquake ground motions, Miscellaneous Paper S-73-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, 1987.
15. Fahjan Y.M. Selection and scaling of real earthquake accelerograms to fit the Turkish Design Spectra. Teknik Dergi 2008, 19(3):4423-4444.
16. Naeim F., Alimoradi A., Pezeshk S. Selection and scaling of ground motion time histories for structural design using genetic algorithm. Earthquake Spectra 2004, 20(2):413-426.
17. Watson-Lamprey J., Abrahamson N. Selection of ground motion time series and limits on scaling. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 2006, 26:477-482.
18. Yeniay O. A comparative study on optimization methods for the constrained nonlinear programming problems. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2005, 2:165-173.
19. Lee K.S., Geem Z.W. A new meta-heuristic algorithm for continuous engineering optimization: harmony search theory and practice. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005, 194:3902-3933.
20. Ayvaz M.T., Kayhan A.H., Ceylan H., Gurarslan G. Hybridizing the harmony search algorithm with a spreadsheet 'Solver' for solving continuous engineering optimization problems. Engineering Optimization 2009, 41(12):1119-1144.
21. Goldberg D.E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning 1989, Addison-Wesley.
22. Haddock J., Mittenthal J. Simulation optimization using simulated annealing. Computers and Industrial Engineering 1992, 387-395.
23. Maniezzo V., Gambardella L.M., De Luigi F. Ant colony optimization, new optimization techniques in engineering 2004, Springer, Germany, p. 101-21.
24. Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks, Piscataway, NJ, 1995.
25. Glover F., Laguna M. Tabu search 1997, Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA.
26. Geem Z.W., Kim J.H., Loganathan G.V. A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation 2001, 76(2):60-68.
27. Kim J.H., Geem Z.W., Kim E.S. Parameter estimation of the nonlinear muskingum model using harmony search. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 2001, 37(5):1131-1138.
28. Degertekin S.O. Optimum design of steel frames using harmony search algorithm. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 2008, 36(4):393-401.
29. Saka M.P. Optimum geometry design of geodesic domes using harmony search algorithm. Advances in Structural Engineering 2007, 10(6):595-606.
30. Saka M.P. Optimum design of steel sway frames to BS5950 using harmony search algorithm. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 2009, 65(1):36-43.
31. Geem Z.W. Optimal cost design of water distribution networks using harmony search. Engineering Optimization 2006, 38(3):259-280.
32. Ayvaz M.T. Application of harmony search algorithm to the solution of groundwater management models. Advances in Water Resources 2009, 32:916-924.
33. Ceylan H., Ceylan H., Haldenbilen S., Baskan O. Transport energy modeling with meta-heuristic harmony search algorithm, an application to Turkey. Energy Policy 2008, 36:2527-2535.
34. Ayvaz M.T. Simultaneous determination of aquifer parameters and zone structures with fuzzy c-means clustering and meta-heuristic harmony search algorithm. Advances in Water Resources 2007, 30:2326-2338.
35. PEER, N.G.A. Strong Motion Database, 〈〉, 2010. http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga.
36. Ambraseys N.N., Douglas J., Rinaldis D., Berge-Thierry C., Suhadolc P., Costa G., Sigbjornsson R., Smit P. Dissemination of European strong-motion data, vol. 2, CD-ROM collection 2004, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK.
37. Beyer K., Bommer J.J. Selection and scaling of real accelerograms for bi-directional loading: a review of current practice and code provisions. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 2007, 11(1):13-45.
38. Malhotra K.P. Strong-motion records for site-specific analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2003, 19(3):557-578.
39. Hancock J., Bommer J.J., Stafford P. Numbers of scaled and matched accelerograms required for inelastic dynamic analyses. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008, 37:1585-1607.
40. Shantz TJ. Selection and scaling of earthquake records for nonlinear dynamic analysis of first mode dominate bridge structures. In: Proceedings of the 8th U.S. national conference on earthquake engineering. San Francisco, CA, 2006.
41. Krinitzsky EL, Chang FK. Specifying peak motions for design earthquakes. State-of-the-art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States. Report 7. Miscellaneous Paper S-73-1. US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi, 1977.
42. Vanmarcke EH. Representation of earthquake ground motion: scaled accelerograms and equivalent response spectra. State-of-the-art for assessing earthquake hazards in the United States. Report 14. Miscellaneous paper S-73-1, US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi, 1979.
43. Coello C.A.C. Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2002, 191:1245-1287.
44. Lee K.S., Geem Z.W., Lee S.H., Bae K.W. The harmony search heuristic algorithm for discrete structural optimization. Engineering Optimization 2005, 37(7):663-684.
45. Microsoft, Microsoft Excel-Visual Basic for applications. Microsoft Press, Washington, 1995.