Configuration knowledge representation using UML/OCL

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2460 LNCS, Issue , 2002, Pages 49-62

  Felfernig, Alexander ^a   Friedrich, Gerhard ^a   Jannach, Dietmar ^a   Zanker, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

CONFIGURATION DOMAINS; COOPERATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING; DISTRIBUTED CONFIGURATION; KNOWLEDGE INTERCHANGE; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION LANGUAGE; KNOWLEDGE-SHARING; PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; SOLUTION PROVIDERS;

UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

EID: 79955152546     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45800-x_5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. T. Baar, R. Hähnle, T. Sattler, and T. H. Schmitt. Entwurfsmustergesteuerte Erzeugung von OCL Constraints. In K. Mehrhorn and G. Snelting, editors, Informatik 2000, 30. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik, pages 389-404. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
2. V. E. Barker, D. E. O'Connor, J. D. Bachant, and E. Soloway. Expert systems for configuration at Digital: XCON and beyond. Communications of the ACM, 32(3):298-318, 1989.
3. T. Berners-Lee. Weaving the Web. Harper Business, 2000.
4. T. Clark, E. Evans, St. Kent, and P. Sammut. The MMF Approach to Engineering Object-Oriented Design Languages. In Workshop on Language Descriptions, Tools and Applications, 2001.
5. A. Evans. Reasoning with UML class diagrams. In Proceedings of the W orkshop on Industrial Strength Formal Methods(WIFT'98), Florida, USA, 1998. IEEE Press.
6. th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2000), pages 146-150, Berlin, Germany, 2000.
7. st International Semantic Web Conference, pages 192-205, 2002.
8. D. Fensel, F. vanHarmelen, I. Horrocks, D. McGuinness, and P. F. Patel-Schneider. OIL: An Ontology Infrastructure for the Semantic Web. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(2):38-45, 2001. (Pubitemid 32496020)
9. G. Fleischanderl, G. Friedrich, A. Haselböck, H. Schreiner, and M. Stumptner. Configuring Large Systems Using Generative Constraint Satisfaction. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 13(4):59-68, 1998. (Pubitemid 128574933)
10. P. Gray, K. Hui, and A. Preece. An Expressive Constraint Language for Semantic Web Applications. In Proceedings of the IJCAI 2001 Workshop on E-Business and the Intelligent Web, pages 46-53, Seattle, WA, 2001.
11. B. N. Grosof. Standardizing XML Rules. In Proceedings of the IJC AI 2001 Workshop on E-Business and the Intelligent Web, pages 2-3, Seattle, WA, 2001.
12. U. Junker. Preference programming for configuration. In Proceedings of Workshop on Configuration (IJCAI'01), Seattle, WA, USA, 2001.
13. th IEEE Conference on AI applciations (CAIA), pages 257-264, Miami, FL, USA, 1991.
14. D. Mailharro. A classification and constraint-based framework for configuration. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering, Design, Analysis and Manufacturing Journal, Special Issue: Configuration Design, 12(4):383-397, 1998. (Pubitemid 128508222)
15. Sh. McIlraith, T. C. Son, and H. Zeng. Mobilizing the Semantic Web with DAML-Enabled Web Services. In Proceedings of the IJCAI 2001 Workshop on E-Business and the Intelligent Web, pages 29-39, Seattle, WA, 2001.
16. S. Mittal and B. Falkenhainer. Dynamic Constraint Satisfaction Problems. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intel ligence (AAAI 90), pages 25-32, Boston, MA, 1990.
17. th International Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1395-1401, Detroit, MI, 1989.
18. th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, pages 36-43, Kaiserslautern, Germany, 1999.
19. J. D. Poole. Model-Driven Architecture: Vision, Standards And Emerging Technologies. In Workshop on Metamodeling and Adaptive Object Models, ECOOP 2001, 2001.
20. rd International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML'2000), volume 1939, pages 265-277, York, UK, 2000. Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
21. J. Rumbaugh, I. Jacobson, and G. Booch. The Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual. Addison-Wesley, 1998.
22. D. Sabin and R. Weigel. Product Configuration Frameworks - A Survey. In B. Faltings and E. Freuder, editors, IEEE Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on Configuration, volume 13, 4, pages 50-58. IEEE, 1998.
23. th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 917-922, Austin, TX, USA, 2000.
24. F. vanHarmelen, P. F. Patel-Schneider, and I. Horrocks. A Model-Theoretic Semantics for DAML+OIL. www.daml.org, March 2001.
25. W3C. Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), ver. 1.2. www.w3c.org, 2001.
26. J. Warmer and A. Kleppe. The Object Constraint Language - Precise Modeling with UML. Addison Wesley Object Technology Series, 1999.
27. M. Yokoo, E. H. Durfee, T. Ishida, and K. Kuwabara. The distributed constraint satisfaction problem. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 10(5):673-685, 1998.