Integration of neural networks and cellular automata for urban planning

Geo-Spatial Information Science

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 6-13

  Yeh, Anthony ^a   Xia, Li ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Cellular automata; GIS; Neural networks; Urban planning; Urban simulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955151276     PISSN: 10095020     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02826669     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Batty, M, and Xie, Y. 1994. From cells to cities. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, 21:531–548.
2. Clarke, K C, and Gaydos, L J. 1998. Loose-coupling a cellular automata model and GIS:long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 12 (7):699–714.
3. White, R, and Engelen, G. 1993. Cellular automata and fractal urban form:a cellular modelling approach to the evolution of urban land-use patterns. Environment and Planning A, 25:1175–1751.
4. Batty, M, Xie, Y, and Sun, Z L. 1999. Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 23:205–233.
5. Webster, C J, and Wu, F. 1999. Regulation, land-use mix, and urban performance. Part 2:simulation. Environment and Planning A, 31:1529–5291.
6. White, R, Engelen, G, and Uijee, I. 1997. The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environment and Planning B. Planning and Design, 24:323–343.
7. Li, X, and Yeh, A G O. 2000. Modelling sustainable urban development by the integration of constrained cellular automata and GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 14 (2):131–152.
8. Yeh, A G O, and Li, X. 2001. A constrained CA model for the simulation and planning of sustainable urban forms using GIS. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, 28:733–753.
9. Ward, D P, Murray, A T, and Phinn, S R. 2000. A stochastically constrained cellular model of urban growth. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 24:539–558.
10. Wu, F, and Webster, C J. 1998. Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning B:Planning and Design, 25:103–126.
11. Clarke, K C, Gaydos, L, and Hoppen, S. 1997. A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environment and Planning B. Planning and Design, 24:247–261.
12. Fischer, M M, and Gopal, S. 1994. Artificial neural networks:a new approach to modelling interregional telecommunication flows. Journal of Regional Science, 34:503–527.
13. Openshaw, S. 1993. “ Modelling spatial interaction using a neural net. ”. In GIS, Spatial Modelling and Policy. Berlin; Springer. Edited by:Fischer, M M, and Nijkamp, P. 147–164.
14. Gong, P. 1996. Integrated analysis of spatial data from multiple sources:using evidential reasoning and artificial neural network techniques for geological mapping. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 62:513–523.
15. Yeh, A G O, and Li, X. 1997. An integrated remote sensing and GIS approach in the monitoring and evaluation of rapid urban growth for sustainable development in the Pearl Rive Delta, China. International Planning Studies, 2:195–222.
16. AGO, Yeh, and Li, X. 1999. Economic development and agricultural land loss in the Pearl River Delta, China. Habitat International, 23:373–390.
17. Wang, F. 1994. The use of artificial neural networks in a geographical information systems for agricultural land-suitability assessment. Environment and Planning A, 26:265–284.