Balancing costs and benefits of automated task allocation in mobile surveillance

ECCE 2010 - European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2010: The 28th Annual Conference of the European Association of Cognitive Ergonomics

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 99-106

  Streefkerk, Jan Willem ^a   Van Esch Bussemakers, Myra ^a   Neerincx, Mark ^b  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Automation trade off; Context aware computing; Mobile devices; Police; Task allocation; Teams

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED SUPPORT; AUTOMATED TASKS; BENEFITS AND COSTS; CONTEXT-AWARE COMPUTING; CONTEXT-AWARE SYSTEMS; COSTS AND BENEFITS; CRITICAL DOMAIN; DECISION ERRORS; EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT; END-USERS; HANDLING TIME; MOBILE SURVEILLANCE; POLICE; RESEARCH APPROACH; RESEARCH LIMITATIONS; RESPONSE TIME; SITUATION AWARENESS; SURVEILLANCE TASK; TASK ALLOCATION; TASK ENVIRONMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEAM COMMUNICATION; TEAMS;

AUTOMATION; COMMUNICATION; COSTS; ERRORS; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MOBILE DEVICES; MONITORING; PORTABLE EQUIPMENT; RESEARCH; USER INTERFACES;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 79955131241     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1962300.1962321     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Carroll, J. M., Rosson, M. B., Convertino, G., & Ganoe, C. H. (2006). Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations. Interacting with computers, 18, 21-46. (Pubitemid 43207497)
2. Cooke, N. & Shope, S. (2004). Designing a synthetic task environment. In S. S, L. Elliot, E. Salas, & D. Coovert (Eds.), Scaled Worlds: Development, Validation, and Application (pp. 263-278). Surrey: Ashgate.
3. Endsley, M. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 97-101).
4. Ferscha, A. (2000). Workspace awareness in mobile virtual teams. In Proceedings of IEEE 9th International Workshops on Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000). (pp. 272-277). Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
5. Gajos, K., Everitt, K., Tan, D., Czerwinski, M., & Weld, D. S. (2008). Predicatability and Accuracy in Adaptive User Interfaces. In In Proceedings of CHI 2008 (Florence, Italy: ACM.
6. Gorman, J., Cooke, N., Pederson, H., Connor, O., & De Joode, J. (2005). Coordinated Awareness of Situation by Teams (CAST): Measuring Team Situation Awareness of a Communication Glitch. In Proceedings of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (pp. 274-277). HFES. (Pubitemid 351742270)
7. Grootjen, M., Neerincx, M., & Markelbach, M. (2007). Dynamic Task Load Scheduling for Platform Control and Navigation on a Naval Ship. In Proceedings of the HFES 51st Annual Meeting. (pp. 1463-1467). Baltimore, MD: HFES.
8. Gutwin, C. & Greenberg, S. (2002). A Descriptive Framework of Workspace Awareness for Real-Time Groupware. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 11, 411-446.
9. Kaber, D. B. & Endsley, M. R. (2004). The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 5, 113-153.
10. McGuirl, J. M. & Sarter, N. B. (2006). Supporting trust calibration and the effective use of decision aids by presenting dynamic system confidence information. Human Factors, 48, 656-665. (Pubitemid 46036195)
11. Muir, B. M. (1987). Trust between humans and machines, and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, 527-539.
12. Neerincx, M. & Lindenberg, J. (2008). Situated cognitive engineering for complex task environments. In J.M.C. S, L. Militello, T. Ormerod, & R. Lipshitz (Eds.), Natural Decision Making and Macrocognition (pp. 371-387). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
13. Parasuraman, R. & Miller, C. (2004). Trust and Etiquette in High-Criticality Automated Systems. Communications of the ACM, 47, 51-55.
14. Parasuraman, R. & Riley, V. (1997). Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse. Human Factors, 39, 230-253.
15. Paymans, T. & Lindenberg, J. (2004). Usability tradeoffs for adaptive user interfaces: ease of use and learnability. In Proceedings of the IUI conference 2004 (pp. 301-303). New York: ACM Press. (Pubitemid 40673752)
16. Rovira, E., McGarry, K., & Parasuraman, R. (2007). Effects of Imperfect Automation on Decision Making in a Simulated Command and Control Task. Human Factors, 49, 76-87. (Pubitemid 46175383)
17. Salas, E., Cooke, N., & Rosen, M. (2008). On Teams, Teamwork, and Team Performance: Discoveries and Developments. Human Factors, 50, 540-547. (Pubitemid 352029816)
18. Sarter, N. B. & Schroeder, B. (2001). Supporting Decision Making and Action Selection under Time Pressure and Uncertainty: The Case of In-Flight Icing. Human Factors, 43, 573-583. (Pubitemid 34327075)
19. Streefkerk, J. W., Esch-Bussemakers, M. P., & Neerincx, M. A. (2006). Designing personal attentive user interfaces in the mobile public safety domain. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 749-770. (Pubitemid 43267491)
20. Streefkerk, J. W., van Esch-Bussemakers, M., & Neerincx, M. (2009). Context-Aware Team Task Allocation to Support Mobile Police Surveillance. In Foundations of Augmented Cognition (LNCS 5638) (pp. 88-97). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
21. Wickens, C. D. (2000). The trade-off for design for routine and unexpected performance: implications of situation awareness. In M. E & D. J. Garland (Eds.), Situation Awareness and Measurement (pp. 190-202). Mahwah: LEA.
22. Wickens, C. D. & Dixon, S. (2007). The benefits of imperfect diagnostic automation: a synthesis of the literature. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 8, 201-212.