Research Related to the Schoolwide Enrichment Triad Model1

Gifted Education International

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 15-39

  Reis, Sally M ^a   Renzulli, Joseph S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955121764     PISSN: 02614294     EISSN: 20479077     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/026142940301800104     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Bandura A., (1977a). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–220.
2. Bandura A., (1977b). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.
3. Baum S., (1985). Learning disabled students with superior cognitive abilities: A validation study of descriptive behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
4. Baum S., (1988). An enrichment program for the gifted learning disabled students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 226–230.
5. Baum S., Renzulli J., Hébert T. P., (in preparation). Reversing underachievement through pursuit of student interests.
6. Burns D. E., (1987). The effects of group training activities on students' creative productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
7. Cooper C., (1983). Administrators' attitudes toward gifted programs based on the enrichment triad/revolving door identification model: Case studies in decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
8. Crandall V. C., Katkovsky W., Crandall V. J., (1965). Children's beliefs in their own control of reinforcement in intellectual-academic situations. Child Development, 36, 91–109.
9. Delcourt M. A. B., (1993). Creative productivity among secondary school students: Combining energy, interest, and imagination. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 23–31.
10. Delcourt M. A. B., (1988). Characteristics related to high levels of creative/productive behavior in secondary school students: A multicase study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
11. Delisle J. R., (1981). The revolving door identification and programming model: Correlates of creative production. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
12. Delisle J. R., (1984). Gifted children speak out. New York: Walker & Company.
13. Ebel R. L., (1951). Estimation of the reliability ratings. Psychometrica, 16, 407–424.
14. Emerick L., (1988). Academic underachievement among the gifted: Students' perceptions of factors relating to the reversal of the academic underachievement pattern. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
15. Feldhusen J. F., (Ed.). (1985). Toward excellence in gifted education. Denver, CO: Love.
16. Gubbins E. J., (1982). Revolving door identification model: Characteristics of talent pool students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
17. Heal M. M., (1989). Student perceptions of labeling the gifted: A comparative case study analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
18. Hébert T. P., (1993). Reflections at graduation: The long-term impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16, 22–28.
19. Houston J. E., (Ed.). (1990). Thesaurus of ERIC descriptors. Phoenix, AZ: Oryx.
20. Imbeau M. B., (1991). Teachers' attitudes toward curriculum compacting: A comparison of different inservice strategies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
21. Instructional Objectives Exchange. (1972). Measures of self-concept K-12 (rev. ed.). Los Angeles: Author.
22. Karafelis P., (1986). The effects of the tri-art drama curriculum on the reading comprehension of students with varying levels of cognitive ability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
23. Newman J. L., (1991). The effects of the talents unlimited model on students' creative productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
24. Olenchak F. R., (1988). The schoolwide enrichment model in the elementary schools: A study of implementation stages and effects on educational excellence. In Renzulli J. S., (Ed.), Technical report on research studies relating to the revolving door identification model (2nd ed., pp. 201–247). Storrs, CT: Bureau of Educational Research, The University of Connecticut.
25. Olenchak F. R., (1991). Assessing program effects for gifted/learning disabled students. In Swassing R., Robinson A., (Eds.). NAGC 1991 Research Briefs. Washington, DC: National Association for Gifted Children.
26. Olenchak F. R., Renzulli J. S., (1989). The effectiveness of the schoolwide enrichment model on selected aspects of elementary school change. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 36–46.
27. Reis S. M., (1981). An analysis of the productivity of gifted students participating in programs using the revolving door identification model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
28. Reis S. M., Burns D. E., Renzulli J. S., (1992). Curriculum compacting: The complete guide to modifying the regular curriculum for high-ability students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
29. Reis S. M., Westberg K. L., Kulikovich J., Caillard F., Hébert T. P., Purcell J. H., Rogers J., Smist J., Plucker J. A., (1992). Technical report of the curriculum compacting study. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
30. Reis S. M., Gubbins E. J., Coyne M., Scheiber R., Eckert B., Jacob J., (in press). Technical report of the Schoolwide Enrichment Model-Reading. Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented.
31. Renzulli J. S., (1975). A guidebook for evaluating programs for the gifted and talented. Ventura, CA: N/S-LTI-G/T.
32. Renzulli J. S., (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
33. Renzulli J. S., (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In Sternberg R. J., Davidson J. E., (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Renzulli J. S., (Ed.). (1988). Technical report of research studies related to the revolving door identification model. Storrs, CT: Bureau of Educational Research, The University of Connecticut.
35. Renzulli J. S., Reis S. M., (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
36. Renzulli J. S., Reis S. M., Smith L. H., (1981). The revolving door identification model. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
37. Renzulli J. S., Smith L. H., (1978a). The compactor. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
38. Renzulli J. S., Smith L. H., (1978b). The learning styles inventory: A measure of student preference for instructional techniques. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
39. Renzulli J. S., Smith L. H., Reis S. M., (1982). Curriculum compacting: An essential strategy for working with gifted students. The Elementary School Journal, 82, 185–194.
40. Schack G. D., (1986). Creative productivity and self-efficacy in children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
41. Schack G. D., Starko A. J., Burns D. E., (1991). Self-efficacy and creative productivity: Three studies of above average ability children. Journal of Research in Education, 1, 44–52.
42. Schlichter C., (1986). Talents unlimited: Applying the multiple talent approach to mainstream and gifted programs. In Renzulli J. S., (Ed.). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 352–390). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
43. Seidel J. V., Kjolseth R., Seymour E., (1988). The ethnograph: A program for the computer-assisted analysis of text-based data (Computer program). Littleton, CO: Qualis Research Associates.
44. Skaught B. J., (1987). The social acceptability of talent pool students in an elementary school using the schoolwide enrichment model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
45. Smith H. W., (1975). Triangulation: The necessity for multimethod approaches. In Smith W. H., (Ed.), Strategies of social research: The methodological imagination (pp. 271–292). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
46. Smith L. H., (1976). Learning styles: Their measurement and educational significance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
47. Starko A. J., (1986). The effects of the revolving door identification model on creative productivity and self-efficacy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
48. Stednitz U., (1985). The influence of educational enrichment on the self-efficacy in young children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
49. Stewart E. D., (1979). Learning styles among gifted/talented students: Preferences for instructional techniques. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
50. Taylor L. A., (1992). The effects of the secondary enrichment triad model arid a career counseling component on the career development of vocationol-technical school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Storrs.
51. Torrance E. P., (1965). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
52. Webb J. T., Meckstroth E. A., Tolan S. S., (1982). Guiding the gifted. Columbus, OH: Ohio Psychology Publishing.