Juvenile Chinook salmon summer microhabitat availability, use, and selection in a central Idaho Wilderness stream

Transactions of the American Fisheries Society

Volumn 138, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 633-644

  Holecek, Dean E ^a   Cromwell, Kara J ^a   Kennedy, Brian P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE CLASS; BODY SIZE; DATA SET; DRAINAGE; HABITAT AVAILABILITY; HABITAT SELECTION; HABITAT TYPE; JUVENILE; MICROHABITAT; OUTCROP; PEBBLE; REARING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIFFLE; SALMONID; STREAMWATER; SUBSTRATE; WOODY DEBRIS;

IDAHO; PACIFIC NORTHWEST; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS TSHAWYTSCHA;

EID: 79955115475     PISSN: 00028487     EISSN: 15488659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/T08-062.1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Achord, S., P. S. Levin, and R. W. Zabel. 2003. Density dependent mortality in Pacific salmon: the ghost of impacts past? Ecology Letters 6:335-342.
2. Achord, S., R. W. Zabel, and B. P. Sandford. 2007. Migration timing, growth, and estimated parr-to-smolt survival rates of wild Snake River spring-summer Chinook salmon from the Salmon River Basin, Idaho, to the lower Snake River. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:142-154.
3. Arend, K. K. 1999. Macrohabitat identification. Pages 75-85 in M. B. Bain and N. J. Stevenson, editors. Aquatic habitat assessment: common methods. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
4. Beechie, T. J., M. Liermann, E. M. Beamer, and R. Henderson. 2005. A classification of habitat types in a large river and their use by juvenile salmonids. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:717-729.
5. Bjornn, T. C., and D. W. Reiser. 1991. Habitat requirements of salmonids in streams. Pages 83-138 in W. R. Meehan, editor. Influences of forest and rangeland management on salmonid fishes and their habitats. American Fisheries Society, Special Publication 19, Bethesda, Maryland.
6. Chapman, D. W., and T. C. Bjornn. 1969. Distribution of salmonids in streams, with special reference to food and feeding. Pages 153-176 in T. G. Northcote, editor. Symposium on salmon and trout in streams. H. R. MacMillan Lectures in Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
7. Crozier, L., and R. W. Zabel. 2006. Climate impacts at multiple scales: evidence for differential population responses in juvenile Chinook salmon. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:1100-1109.
8. Cummins, K. W. 1962. An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic waters. American Midland Naturalist 67:477-504.
9. Everest, F. H., and D. W. Chapman. 1972. Habitat selection and spatial interaction by juvenile Chinook salmon and steelhead trout in two Idaho streams. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 29:91-100.
10. Fausch, K. D., B. E. Rieman, M. K. Young, and J. B. Dunham. 2006. Strategies for conserving native salmonid populations at risk from nonnative fish invasions: tradeoffs in using barriers to upstream movement. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, RMRS-GTR-174.
11. Hardy, T. B., T. Shaw, R. C. Addley, G. E. Smith, M. Rode, and M. Belchik. 2006. Validation of Chinook fry behavior-based escape cover modeling in the lower Klamath River. International Journal of River Basin Management 4(2):2-10.
12. Hillman, T. W., J. S. Griffith, and W. S. Platts. 1987. Summer and winter habitat selection by juvenile Chinook salmon in a highly sedimented Idaho stream. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116:185-195.
13. ICTRT (Interior Columbia River Technical Recovery Team). 2007. Status review: Big Creek spring/summer Chinook salmon. ICTRT Work Group Draft. Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle. Available: www.nwfsc.noaa. gov. (June 2008).
14. Jacobs, J. 1974. Quantitative measurement of food selection: a modification of the forage ratio and Ivlev's index. Oecologia 14:413-417.
15. Jowett, I. G. 1992. Models of the abundance of large brown trout in New Zealand rivers. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 12:417-432.
16. Lyons, J. 1991. Predicting smallmouth bass presence/absence and abundance in Wisconsin streams using physical habitat characteristics. Pages 91-103 in D. C. Jackson, editor. The first international smallmouth bass symposium. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State.
17. McHugh, P., P. Budy, and H. Schaller. 2004. A model-based assessment of the potential response of Snake River spring-summer Chinook salmon to habitat improvements. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:622-638.
18. Muhlfeld, C. C., D. H. Bennett, and B. Marotz. 2001. Summer habitat use by Columbia River redband trout in the Kootenai River drainage, Montana. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 21:223-235.
19. NMFS (National Marine Fisheries Service). 1992. Final rule: endangered and threatened species; threatened status for Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon, threatened status for Snake River fall Chinook salmon. Federal Register 57: (22 April 1992):14653-14663.
20. Rosenfeld, J. 2003. Assessing the habitat requirements of stream fishes: an overview and evaluation of different approaches. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society: 132:953-968.
21. Scarnecchia, D. L., and B. B. Roper. 2000. Large-scale, differential summer habitat use of three anadromous salmonids in a large river basin in Oregon, USA. Fisheries Management and Ecology 7:197-209.
22. Shaw, P. J. A. 2003. Multivariate statistics for the environmental sciences. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Simonson, T. D., J. Lyons, and P. D. Kanhel. 1994. Quantifying fish habitat in streams: transect spacing, sample size, and a proposed framework. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 14:607-615.
24. Thurow, R. F. 1994. Underwater methods for study of salmonids in the Intermountain West. U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report INT-GTR-307.
25. Thurow, R. F. 2000. Dynamics of fall Chinook salmon populations within Idaho's Frank Church Wilderness: implications for persistence. In S. F. McCool, D. N. Cole, W. T. Borrie, and J. O'Loughlin, editors. Wilderness science in a time of change conference, volume 3: wilderness as a place for scientific inquiry, 1999 May 23-27, Proceedings RMRS-P-15-VOL-3, Missoula, Montana.
26. Thurow, R. F., and D. J. Schill. 1996. Comparison of day snorkeling, night snorkeling, and electrofishing to estimate bull trout abundance and size structure in a second-order Idaho stream. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 16:314-323.
27. Urabe, H., and S. Nakano. 1999. Linking microhabitat availability and local density of rainbow trout in low-gradient Japanese streams. Ecological Research 14:341-349.
28. Zabel, R. W., and S. Achord. 2004. Relating size of juvenile to survival within and among populations of Chinook salmon. Ecology 85:795-806.