Factors influencing therapists' decision-making in the acceptance of new technology devices in stroke rehabilitation

American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 90, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 415-425

  Chen, Christine C ^a,c   Bode, Rita K ^b  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

Practice Issues; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Therapy Devices

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MASS COMMUNICATION; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REIMBURSEMENT; SAFETY; STROKE; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION MAKING; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REIMBURSEMENT MECHANISMS; SAFETY; STROKE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79955109043     PISSN: 08949115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318214f5d8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Lum P, Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, et al: Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke: Current status and challenges to clinical acceptance. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002;8:40-53 (Pubitemid 34226095)
2. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI: Effect of robotassisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:111-21 (Pubitemid 351287594)
3. Mehrholz J, Platz T, Kugler J, et al: Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving arm function and activities of daily living after stroke [review]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;4: CD006876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub2. Available at: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley. com/ cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD006876/frame.html. Accessed on July 1, 2010
4. Davis SE, Mulcahey MJ, Betz RR, et al: Outcomes of upper-extremity tendon transfers and functional electrical stimulation in an adolescent with C-5 tetraplegia. Am J Occup Ther 1997;51:307-12 (Pubitemid 127456885)
5. Alon G, McBride K, Ring H: Improving selected hand functions using a noninvasive neuroprosthesis in persons with chronic stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2002;11:99-106 (Pubitemid 35283039)
6. Alon G, McBride K: Persons with C5 or C6 tetraplegia achieve selected functional gains using a neuroprosthesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84: 119-24 (Pubitemid 36084034)
7. Ring H, Rosenthal N: Controlled study of neuroprosthetic functional electrical stimulation in subacute post-stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:32-6 (Pubitemid 40214506)
8. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, et al: Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairments and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84: 477-82 (Pubitemid 36417645)
9. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, et al: Robotic therapy for chronic motor impairments after stroke: Follow-up results. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1106-11 (Pubitemid 38962368)
10. Masiero S, Celia A, Rosati G, et al: Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:142-9 (Pubitemid 46161321)
11. Bovolenta F, Goldoni M, Clerici P, et al: Robot therapy for functional recovery of the upper limbs: A pilot study on patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:971-5
12. Kuiken TA, Dumanian GA, Lipschutz RD, et al: The use of targeted muscle reinnervation for improved myoelectric prosthesis control in a bilateral shoulder disarticulation amputee. Prosthet Orthot Int 2004; 28:245-53 (Pubitemid 40103696)
13. Stubblefield KA, Miller LA, Lipschutz RD, et al: Occupational therapy protocol for amputees with targeted muscle reinnervation. J Rehabil Res Dev 2009;46:481-8
14. Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, et al: Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist-versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: A randomized controlled study. Stroke 2008;39:1786-92
15. Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, et al: Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23:5-13
16. Masiero S, Carraro E, Ferraro C, et al: Upper limb rehabilitation robotics alter stroke: A perspective from the university of Padua, Italy. J Rehabil Med 2009;41:981-5
17. Volpe BT, Lynch D, Rykman-Berland A, et al: Intensive sensory motor training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:305-10 (Pubitemid 351561668)
18. Gray DB, Quatrano LA, Lieberman ML, eds: Designing and Using Assistive Technology: The Human Perspective. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1998
19. Mann WC, Hicks EE: Products and technology. In: Bonder BR, Dal Bello-Hass V, eds. Functional Performance in Older Adults. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: FA Davis; 591-608
20. Dijkers MP, deBear PC, Erlandson RF, et al: Patient and staff acceptance of robotic technology in occupational therapy: A pilot study. J Rehabil Res Dev 1991;28:33-44
21. Kennedy T, Regehr G, Rosenfield J, et al: Exploring the gap between knowledge and behavior: A qualitative study of clinician action following an educational intervention. Acad Med 2004;79:386-93 (Pubitemid 38544292)
22. Ammenwerth E, Mansmann U, Iller C, et al: Factors affecting and affected by user acceptance of computer-based nursing documentation: Results of a 2-year study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2003; 10:69-84 (Pubitemid 36134063)
23. Parè G, Sicotte C, Jacques H: The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians' acceptance of clinical information systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006;13:197-205 (Pubitemid 43332911)
24. Dowell J, Jones A, Snadden D: Exploring medication use to seek concordance with Fnon-adherent patients: A qualitative study. Br J Gen Prac 2002; 52:24-32 (Pubitemid 34097402)
25. Wallace LM, Freeman T, Latham L, et al: Organizational strategies for changing clinical practice: How trusts are meeting the challenges of clinical governance. Qual Health Care 2001;10:76-82
26. Ely B: Pediatric nurses' pain management practice: Barriers to change. Pediatr Nurs 2001;27:473-80
27. Iwamuro BT, Cruz EG, Connelly LL, et al: Effect of a gravity-compensating orthosis on reaching after stroke: Evaluation of the therapy assistant WREX. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:2121-8
28. Cherney LR, Halper AS: Novel technology for treating individuals with aphasia and concomitant cognitive deficits. Top Stroke Rehabil 2008;16:542-54
29. Parochka J, Paprockas K: A continuing education lecture and work shop, physician behavior, and barriers to change. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2001;21:110-6
30. Scherer MJ: Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27:731-9