STDP enables spiking neurons to detect hidden causes of their inputs

Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22 - Proceedings of the 2009 Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 1357-1365

  Nessler, Bernhard ^a   Pfeiffer, Michael ^a   Maass, Wolfgang ^a  

^a GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNCTIONS; MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE; NEURAL NETWORKS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

COMPUTATIONAL FUNCTIONS; COMPUTATIONAL POWER; CORTICAL MICROCIRCUITS; HIGH-DIMENSIONAL; INTERNAL MODELS; SPIKE TIMING DEPENDENT PLASTICITIES; SPIKING NEURONES; STOCHASTICS; SYNAPTIC WEIGHT; WINNER-TAKE-ALL CIRCUITS;

NEURONS;

EID: 79955090327     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Y. Dan and M. Poo. Spike timing-dependent plasticity of neural circuits. Neuron, 44:23-30, 2004.
2. L. F. Abbott and S. B. Nelson. Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast. Nature Neuroscience, 3:1178-1183, 2000.
3. A. Morrison, A. Aertsen, and M. Diesmann. Spike-timing-dependent plasticity in balanced random networks. Neural Computation, 19:1437-1467, 2007.
4. R. J. Douglas and K. A. Martin. Neuronal circuits of the neocortex. Annu Rev Neurosci, 27:419-451, 2004.
5. G. E. Hinton and Z. Ghahramani. Generative models for discovering sparse distributed representations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci., 352(1358):1177-1190, 1997.
6. Y. LeCun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11):2278-2324, 1998.
7. A. Gupta and L. N. Long. Character recognition using spiking neural networks. IJCNN, pages 53-58, 2007.
8. B. Nessler, M. Pfeiffer, and W. Maass. Spike-timing dependent plasticity performs stochastic expectation maximization to reveal the hidden causes of complex spike inputs. (in preparation).
9. M. Meilǎ and D. Heckerman. An experimental comparison of model-based clustering methods. Machine Learning, 42(1):9-29, 2001.
10. C. M. Bishop. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. Springer, New York, 2006.
11. G. McLachlan and D. Peel. Finite mixture models. Wiley, 2000.
12. J.H. Kushner and G.G. Yin. Stochastic approximation algorithms and applications. Springer, 1997.
13. B. Nessler, M. Pfeiffer, and W. Maass. Hebbian learning of bayes optimal decisions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 21, pages 1169-1176. MIT Press, 2009.
14. M. Sato. Fast learning of on-line EM algorithm. Rapport Technique, ATR Human Information Processing Research Laboratories, 1999.
15. Z. Ghahramani and M.I. Jordan. Mixture models for learning from incomplete data. Computational Learning Theory and Natural Learning Systems, 4:67-85, 1997.
16. V. Vapnik. Universal learning technology: Support vector machines. NEC Journal of Advanced Technology, 2:137-144, 2005.
17. A. Y. Ng and M. I. Jordan. On discriminative vs. generative classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 14:841-848, 2002.
18. P. J. Sjöström, G. G. Turrigiano, and S. B. Nelson. Rate, timing, and cooperativity jointly determine cortical synaptic plasticity. Neuron, 32:1149-1164, 2001.