Executive control of perceptual features and abstract relations by baboons (Papio papio)

Behavioural Brain Research

Volumn 222, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 176-182

  Bonté, Elodie ^a,b   Flemming, Timothy ^a   Fagot, Joël ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b CNRS UMR 6193   (France)

Author keywords

Abstract relation; Cognitive flexibility; Executive function; Primate; WCST

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACT RELATION; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; LEARNING; NONHUMAN; PAPIO PAPIO; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; WISCONSIN CARD SORTING TEST;

AGE FACTORS; ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COLOR PERCEPTION; CONCEPT FORMATION; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PAPIO PAPIO; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME;

EID: 79955082815     PISSN: 01664328     EISSN: 18727549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.034     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Baddeley A. Exploring the central executive. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1996, 5-28. 49A.
2. Baddeley A.D., Hitch G. Working memory. The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory 1974, vol. 8:47-89. Academic Press, New York.
3. Berg E.A. A simple objective test for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology 1948, 39:15-22.
4. Royall D.R., Lauterbach E.C., Cummings J.L., Reeve A., Rummans T.A., Kaufer D.I., et al. Executive control function: a review of its promise and challenges for clinical research. A report from the Committee on Research of the American Neuropsychiatric Association. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 2002, 14:377-405.
5. Stoet G., Snyder L.H. Neural correlates of executive control functions in the monkey. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:228-234.
6. Milner B. Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Archives of Neurology 1963, 9:90-100.
7. Rougier N.P., Noelle D.C., Braver T.S., Cohen J.D., O'Reilly R.C. Prefrontal cortex and flexible cognitive control: rules without symbols. PNAS 2005, 102:7338-7343.
8. Grant D.A., Berg E.A. A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1948, 34:404-411.
9. Ashendorf L., McCafferty R.J. Exploring age-related decline on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 2008, 22:262-272.
10. Krawczyk D.C., Hanten G., Wilde E.A., Li X., Schnelle K.P., Merkley T.L., et al. Deficits in analogical reasoning in adolescents with traumatic brain injury. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010, 4:1-13.
11. Robinson A.L., Heaton R.K., Lehman R.A., Stilson D.W. The utility of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in detecting and localizing frontal lobe lesions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1980, 48:605-614.
12. Nyhus E., Barcelo F. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and the cognitive assessment of prefrontal executive functions: a critical update. Brain and Cognition 2009, 71:437-451.
13. Strauss E., Sherman E.M.S., Spreen O. A compendium of neuropsychological tests. Administration, norms, and commentary 2006, Oxford University Press, New York. 3rd ed.
14. Demakis G.J. A meta-analytic review of the sensitivity of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test to frontal and lateralized frontal brain damage. Neuropsychology 2003, 17:255-264.
15. Milner B. Aspects of human frontal lobe function. Advances in Neurology 1995, 66:67-81.
16. Marenco S., Coppola R., Daniel D.G., Zigun J.R., Weinberger D.R. Regional cerebral blood flow during the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in normal subjects studied by xenon-133 dynamic SPECT: comparison of absolute values, percent distribution values, and covariance analysis. Psychiatry Research 1993, 50:177-192.
17. Nagahama Y., Fukuyama H., Yamauchi H., Katsumi Y., Magata Y., Shibasaki H., et al. Age-related changes in cerebral blood flow activation during a Card Sorting Test. Experimental Brain Research 1997, 114:571-577.
18. Passingham R. Non-reversal shifts after selective prefrontal ablation in monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Neuropsychologia 1972, 10:41-46.
19. Moore T.L., Killiany R.J., Herndon J.G., Rosene D.L., Moss M.B. A non-human primate test of abstraction and set shifting: an automated adaptation of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2005, 146:165-173.
20. Moore T.L., Schletter S.P., Killiany R.J., Rosene D.L., Moss M.B. Effects on executive function following damage to the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral Neuroscience 2009, 123:231-241.
21. Stoet G., Snyder L.H. Executive control and task-switching in monkeys. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:1357-1364.
22. Washburn D.A. Stroop-like effects for monkeys and humans: processing speed or strength of association?. Psychological Science 1994, 5:375-379.
23. Moore T.L., Killiany R.J., Herndon J.G., Rosene D.L., Moss M.B. Impairment in abstraction and set shifting in aged Rhesus monkeys. Neurobiology of Aging 2003, 24:125-134.
24. Richland L.E., Morrison R.G., Holyoak K.J. Children's development of analogical reasoning: insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2006, 94:249-273.
25. Thibaut J.-P., French R., Vezneva M. The development of analogy making in children: cognitive load and executive functions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 2010, 106:1-19.
26. Gentner D., Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science 1983, 7:155-170.
27. Hofstadter D.R. Analogy as the core of cognition. The analogical mind: perspectives from cognitive science 2001, 499-538. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Gentner, K.J. Holyoak, B.N. Kokinov (Eds.).
28. Premack D. Animal cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 1983, 34:351-362.
29. Thompson R.K.R., Oden D.L. Categorical perception and conceptual judgments by nonhuman primates: the paleological monkey and the analogical ape. Cognitive Science 2000, 24:363-396.
30. Fagot J., Paleressompoulle D. Automated testing of cognitive performance in baboons maintained in social groups. Behavior Research Methods 2009, 41:396-404.
31. Fagot J., Bonté E. Automated testing of cognitive performance in monkeys: use of a battery of computerized test systems by a troop of semi-free-ranging baboons (Papio papio). Behavior Research Methods 2010, 42:507-516.
32. Fagot J., Parron C. Relational matching in baboons (Papio papio) with reduced grouping requirements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2010, 36:184-193.
33. Fagot J, Thomspon RKR. Two-by-two relational matching in baboons (Papio papio) with shapes as stimuli; in preparation.
34. Moore T.L., Killiany R.J., Herndon J.G., Rosene D.L., Moss M.B. Executive system dysfunction occurs as early as middle-age in the rhesus monkey. Neurobiology of Aging 2006, 27:1484-1493.
35. Rapp P.R. Visual discrimination and reversal learning in the aged monkey (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral Neuroscience 1990, 104:876-884.
36. Weed M.R., Bryant R., Perry S. Cognitive development in macaques: attentional set-shifting in juvenile and adult rhesus monkeys. Neuroscience 2008, 157:22-28.
37. Anderson J.R. Discrimination learning and multiple reversals in young adult and older monkeys Macaca arctoides. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1996, 49B:193-200.
38. Rattermann M.J., Gentner D. The use of relational labels improves young children's performance in a mapping task. Advances in analogy research: integration of theory and data from the cognitive, computational and neural sciences 1998, 274-282. New Bulgarian University, Sofia, Bulgaria. K.J. Holyoak, D. Gentner, B.N. Kokinov (Eds.).
39. Goswami U., Brown A.L. Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition 1989, 35:69-95.
40. Richland L.E., Morrison R.G. Is analogical reasoning just another measure of executive functioning?. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010, 4:180.