Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. I: Assessment of ductile moment frames

Journal of Structural Engineering

Volumn 137, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 481-491

  Haselton, Curt B ^a   Liel, Abbie B ^b   Deierlein, Gregory G ^c   Dean, Brian S ^d   Chou, Jason H ^e  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UCB 450   (United States)

^c Stanford University   (United States)

^d WALTER P MOORE   (United States)

^e Quincy Engineering Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Concrete structures; Earthquake engineering; Frames; Reinforced concrete; Seismic effects; Structural failures; Structural reliability

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE STRUCTURES; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; FRAMES; SEISMIC EFFECT; STRUCTURAL FAILURE; STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY;

BUILDING CODES; CIVIL ENGINEERING; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; EARTHQUAKES; ENGINEERING GEOLOGY; FAILURE (MECHANICAL); FRACTURE MECHANICS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY; REINFORCED CONCRETE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY ENGINEERING; STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

EID: 79955036396     PISSN: 07339445     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000318     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. American Concrete Institute (ACI). (2002). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary. ACI 318-02/ACI 318R-02, Farmington Hills, MI
2. ASCE. (2002). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-02, Reston, VA
3. ASCE. (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. ASCE 7-05, Reston, VA
4. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A. (2006). Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 35, 1077-1095. 1096-9845 10.1002/eqe.571 (Pubitemid 44044511)
5. FEMA. (2009). Recommended methodology for quantification of building system performance and response parameters. FEMA P695A, Prepared by the Applied Technology Council, Redwood, CA.
6. Goulet, C., (2007). Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete frame building-From seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 36, 1973-1997. 10.1002/eqe.694 (Pubitemid 350042027)
7. Haselton, C. B., (2008 a). An assessment to benchmark the seismic performance of a code-conforming reinforced-concrete moment-frame building. PEER Rep. 2007/12, PEER Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
8. Haselton, C. B., Baker, J. W., Liel, A. B., and Deierlein, G. G. (2011). Accounting for ground-motion spectral shape characteristics in structural collapse assessment through an adjustment for epsilon. J. Struct. Eng., 0970-0137 137 (3), 332-344.
9. Haselton, C. B., and Deierlein, G. G. (2007). Assessing seismic collapse safety of modern reinforced concrete frame buildings. PEER Rep. 2007/08, PEER Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
10. Haselton, C. B., Liel, A. B., Taylor Lange, S., and Deierlein, G. G. (2008 b). Beam-column element model calibrated for predicting flexural response leading to global collapse of RC frame buildings. PEER Rep. 2007/03, PEER Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA.
11. Ibarra, L. F., Medina, R. A., and Krawinkler, H. (2005). Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 34, 1489-1511. 10.1002/eqe.495 (Pubitemid 41419658)
12. International Code Council (ICC). (2003). International building code, Falls Church, VA.
13. Krawinkler, H., and Ibarra, L. (2003). Collapse probability of frame structures with deteriorating properties. Proc., Performance-Based Engineering for Earthquake Resistant Reinforced Concrete Structures, Int. Symp. Honoring Shunsuke Otani, Dept. of Agriculture, Univ. of Tokyo, Tokyo, 325-338.
14. Krawinkler, H., and Zareian, F. (2007). Prediction of collapse-How realistic and practical is it, and what can we learn from it? Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 16, 633-653. (Pubitemid 351155937)
15. Liel, A. B., Haselton, C. B., and Deierlein, G. G. (2011). Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. II: Comparative assessment of nonductile and ductile moment frames. J. Struct. Eng. 0970-0137, 137 (4), 492-502.
16. Liel, A. B., Haselton, C. B., Deierlein, G. G., and Baker, J. W. (2009). Incorporating modeling uncertainties in the assessment of seismic collapse risk of buildings. Struct. Saf., 31 (2), 197-211. 0167-4730 10.1016/j.strusafe.2008. 06.002
17. Luco, N., Ellingwood, B. R., Hamburger, R. O., Hooper, J. D., Kimball, J. K., and Kircher, C. (2007). Risk-targeted versus current seismic design maps for the conterminous United States. SEAOC 2007 Convention Proc., Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA.
18. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSEES). (2009). Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, CA, http://opensees.berkeley.edu/ (Feb. 22, 2011).
19. Park, R., and Paulay, T. (1975). Reinforced concrete structures, Wiley, New York.
20. Vamvatsikos, D., and Allin Cornell, C. (2002). Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 1096-9845, 31 (3), 491-514. 10.1002/eqe.141 (Pubitemid 34140538)