How much can the number of jabiru stork (Ciconiidae) nests vary due to change of flood extension in a large Neotropical floodplain?

Zoologia

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 751-756

  Mourão, Guilherme ^a   Tomas, Walfrido ^a   Campos, Zilca ^a  

^a EMBRAPA CERRADOS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Flood; Jabiru mycteria; Jabiru nesting; Neotropical wetlands; Pantanal

Indexed keywords

AVES; CICONIIDAE; JABIRU; JABIRU MYCTERIA;

EID: 79955035745     PISSN: 19844670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1984-46702010000500012     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Alvarenga, S.M.; A.E. Brasil; R. Pinheiro & H.J.H. Kux. 1984. Estudo geomorfológico aplicado a Bacia do Alto Paraguai e Pantanais Matogrossenses. Boletim Técnico Projeto RADAM/BRASIL, Série Geomorfologia 187: 89-183.
2. Antas, P.T.Z. & I.L.S. Nascimento. 1996. Tuiuiú: sob os céus do Pantanal. Biologia e conservação do tuiuiú Jabiru mycteria. São Paulo, Empresa das Artes, 169p.
3. Barnhill, R.A.; D. Weyer; W.F. Young; K.G. Smith & D.A. James. 2005. Breeding biology of Jabirus (Jabiru mycteria) in Belize. Wilson Bulletin 117: 142-153.
4. Bayliss, P. & K.M. Yeomans. 1989. Correcting bias in aerial survey population estimates of feral livestock in Northern Australia using double count technique. Journal of Applied Ecology 26: 925-933.
5. Bird Life International. 2009. Jabiru mycteria. In: IUCN (Ed.) IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.2. Avalaible online at: www.iucnredlist.org [Accessed: 18/XII/2009].
6. Campos, Z. & M.E. Coutinho. 2004. Levantamento aéreo de ninhos de tuiuiú, Jabiru mycteria, no Pantanal Sul. Boletim de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Embrapa Pantanal 56: 1-14. Available online at: www.cpap.embrapa.br/publicacoes/online/BP56.pdf [Accessed: 11/VIII/2008].
7. Campos, Z. & W.E. Magnusson. 1995. Relationship between rainfall, nesting habitat and fecundity of Caiman crocodilus yacare in the Pantanal, Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 11: 351-358.
8. Caughley, G. & D. Grice. 1982. A correction factor for counting emus from the air, and its application to counts in Western Australia. Australian Wildlife Research 9: 253-259.
9. Da Silva, C.J. & P. Girard. 2004. New challenges in the management of the Brazilian Pantanal and catchment area. Wetlands Ecology and Management 12: 553-561.
10. David, P.G. 1994. Wading birds nesting at Lake Okeechobee, Florida: an historical perspective. Colonial Birds 17: 69-77.
11. Frederick, P.C. & J.C. Ogden. 2001. Pulsed breeding of longlegged wading birds and the importance of infrequent severe drought conditions in the Florida Everglades. Wetlands 21: 484-491.
12. González, J.A. 1996. Breeding biology of the jabiru in the southern Llanos of Venezuela. Wilson Bulletin 108: 524-534.
13. Graham A. & R. Bell. 1989. Investigating observer bias in aerial survey by simultaneous double-counts. Journal of Wildlife Management 53 (4): 1009-1016.
14. Hamilton, S.K. 1999. Potential effects of a major navigation project (Paraguay - Paraná hydrovia) on inundation in the Pantanal floodplains. Regulating Rivers: Research of Management 15: 289-299.
15. Hamilton, S.K.; S.J. Sippel & J.M. Melack. 1996. Inundation patterns in the Pantanal wetland of South America determined from passive microwave remote sensing. Archives fur Hydrobiology 137: 1-23.
16. Hancock, J.A.; J.A. Kushlan & M.P. Kahl. 1992. Storks and spoonbills of the world. London, Academic Press, 385p.
17. Harris, M.; W. Tomás; G. Mourão; C.J. Da Silva; E. Guimarães; F. Sonoda & E. Fachim. 2005. Safeguarding the Pantanal wetlands: threats and conservation initiatives. Conservation Biology 19: 714-720.
18. Junk, W.J. & C.N. Cunha. 2005. Pantanal: a large South American wetland at a crossroads. Ecology Engineering 24: 391-401.
19. Junk, W.J.; M. Brown; I.C. Campbell; M. Finlayson; B. Gopall; L. Ramberg & B.G. Warner. 2006a. The comparative biodiversity of seven globally important wetlands: a synthesis. Aquatic Sciences 68: 400-414.
20. Junk, W.J.; C.N. Cunha; K.M. Wantzen; P. Petermann; C. Strussmann; M.I. Marques & J. Adis. 2006b. Biodiversity and its conservation in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Aquatic Sciences 68: 278-309.
21. Magnusson, W.; G.J. Caughley & G.C. Grigg. 1978. A double survey estimate of population size from incomplete counts. Journal of Wildlife Management 42: 174-176.
22. nd ed., 201p.
23. Mourão, G.; M.E. Coutinho; R.A. Mauro; Z. Campos; W. Tomás & W.E. Magnusson. 2000. Aerial survey of caiman, marsh deer and pampas deer in the Pantanal Wetland of Brazil. Biological Conservation 92: 175-183.
24. Mourão, G.; M.D. Oliveira; D.F. Calheiros; C.R. Padovani; E.J. Marques & M. Uetanabaro. 2002. O Pantanal mato-grossense, p. 29-49. In: U. Seedliger; C. Cordazzo & F. Barbosa (Eds). Os sites e o programa brasileiro de pesquisas ecológicas de longa duração. Belo Horizonte, CNPq, 184p.
25. Pott, A. & V.J. Pott. 1994. Plantas do Pantanal. Embrapa, Brasília, 320p.
26. Potvin, F.; L. Breton & L.P. Rivest. 2004. Aerial surveys for whitetailed deer with the double-count technique in Québec: two 5-year plans completed. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32: 1099-1107.
27. Sick, H. 1997. Ornitologia brasileira. Rio de Janeiro, Editora Nova Fronteira, 862p.
28. Silva, J.S.V. & M.M. Abdon. 1998. Delimitação do Pantanal brasileiro e suas sub-regiões. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 33: 1703-1711.
29. nd ed., 469p.
30. Stotz, D.F.; J.W. Fitzpatrick; T.A. Parker & D.K. Moskovits. 1996. Neotropical birds: ecology and conservation. Chicago, University of Chicaco Press, 700p.
31. Tomas, W.; S.M. Salis; M.P. Silva & G. Mourão. 2001. Marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) distribution as a function of floods in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Studies of Neotropical Fauna and Environment 36: 9-13.
32. Valderrama, M.B. & M. Petrere. 1994. Crecimento del bocachio Prochilodus magdalenae Steindachner 1878 (Prochilodontidae), y su relación con el regimen hidrológico en la parte baja de la cuenca del rio Magdalena (Colombia). Boletim Científico INPA 2: 136-152.