Predictors of placement for children who initially remained in their homes after an investigation for abuse or neglect

Child Abuse and Neglect

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 188-198

  Horwitz, Sarah McCue ^a   Hurlburt, Michael S ^b,c   Cohen, Steven D ^d   Zhang, Jinjin ^b   Landsverk, John ^b,c,e  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d Annie E Casey Foundation   (United States)

^e WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

Child abuse; Parent training; Social work services

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; CHILD NEGLECT; CHILD WELFARE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCOME; INFANT; INTERVIEW; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREDICTION; RISK FACTOR; SCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL WELFARE; SOCIAL WORK;

ADOLESCENT; CAREGIVERS; CHILD; CHILD ABUSE; CHILD WELFARE; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; FOSTER HOME CARE; HUMANS; INCOME; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SOCIAL WORK; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79955035676     PISSN: 01452134     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2010.12.002     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Barth R.P., Landsverk J., Chamberlain P., Reid J.B., Rolls J.A., Hurlburt M.S., Farmer E.M.Z., James S., McCabe K.M., Kohl P.K. Parent-training programs in child welfare services: Planning for a more evidence-based approach to serving biological parents. Research on Social Work Practice 2005, 15:353-371.
2. Biemer P.P., Dowd K., Webb M.B. Study design and methods. Child welfare and child well-being: New perspectives from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being 2010, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3-54. M.B. Webb, K. Dowd, B.J. Harden, J.A. Landsverk, M.F. Testa (Eds.).
3. Chaffin M., Friedrich B. Evidence-based treatments in child abuse and neglect. Children and Youth Services Review 2004, 26:1097-1113.
4. DePanfilis D., Zuravin S.J. The effect of services on the recurrence of child maltreatment. Child Abuse & Neglect 2002, 26(2):187-205.
5. Dorsey S., Mustillo S.A., Farmer E.M., Elbogen E. Caseworker assessments of risk for recurrent maltreatment: Association with case-specific risk factors and re-reports. Child Abuse & Neglect 2008, 32(3):377-391.
6. Dowd K., Kinsey S., Wheeless S., Thissen R., Richardson J., Suresh R. National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being: Combined waves 1-4, data file user's manual restricted release version 2004, National Data Archive on Child Abuse and Neglect, Ithaca, NY.
7. Drake B., Jonson-Reid M., Sapokaite L. Re-reporting of child maltreatment: Does participation in other public sector services moderate the likelihood of a second maltreatment report?. Child Abuse & Neglect 2006, 30(11):1201-1226.
8. Drake B., Jonson-Reid M., Way I., Chung S. Substantiation and recidivism. Child Maltreatment 2003, 8(4):248-260.
9. English D.J., Marshal D.D., Brummel S., Orme M. Characteristics of repeated referrals to child protective services in Washington State. Child Maltreatment 1999, 4:297-307.
10. Gershater-Molko R.M., Lutzker J.R., Wesch D. Using recidivism data to evaluate project safecare: Teaching bonding, safety, and health care skills to parents. Child Maltreatment 2002, 7(3):277-285.
11. Horwitz S.M., Hurlburt M.S., Zhang Z. Patterns and predictors of mental health services use by children in contact with the Child Welfare System. Child welfare and child wellbeing: New perspectives from the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being 2010, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 279-329. M.B. Webb, K. Dowd, B.J. Harden, J.A. Landsverk, M.F. Testa (Eds.).
12. Hurlburt M.S., Barth R.P., Leslie L.K., Landsverk J.A., McCrae J.S. Building on strengths: Current status and opportunities for improvement of parent training for families in child welfare. Child protection: Using research to improve policy and practice 2007, Brookings, Washington, DC, pp. 81-106. F. Wulczyn, M. Webb, R. Haskins (Eds.).
13. Inkelas M., Halfon N. Recidivism in child protective services. Children and Youth Services Review 1997, 19(3):139-161.
14. Kinard E.M. Methodological issues and practical problems in conducting research on maltreated children. Child Abuse & Neglect 1994, 18(8):645-656.
15. Kohl P.L., Jonson-Reid M., Drake B. Time to leave substantiation behind: Findings from a national probability study. Child Maltreatment 2009, 14(1):17-26.
16. Leventhal J.M. Research strategies and methodologic standards in studies of risk factors for child abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect 1982, 6(2):113-123.
17. McMaiton B., Trichopoulus D. Epidemiology 1996, Little Brown and Company, Boston, MA.
18. NSCAW Research Group Methodological lessons for the National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being: The first three years of the USA's first national probability study of children and families investigated for abuse and neglect. Children and Youth Services Review 2002, 24:513-541.
19. Schuerman A.J., Rzepnicki T.L., Littell J.H. Putting families first: An experiment in family preservation 1994, Walter de Gruyter, New York.
20. Sidebotham P., Heron J., ALSPAC Study Team Child maltreatment in the " children of the nineties" A cohort study of risk factors. Child Abuse & Neglect 2006, 30(5):497-522.
21. Understanding child abuse and neglect. Panel on child abuse and social sciences and education, national research council 1993, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
22. Way I., Chung S., Jonson-Reid M., Drake B. Maltreatment perpetrators: A 54-month analysis of recidivism. Child Abuse & Neglect 2001, 25(8):1093-1108.
23. Zuravin S.J., DePanfilis D. Factors affecting foster care placement of children receiving child protective services. Social Work Research 1997, 21:34-42.