Orbital development in survivors of retinoblastoma treated by enucleation with hydroxyapatite implant

British Journal of Ophthalmology

Volumn 95, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 630-633

  Lin, Hsiu Yi ^a   Liao, Shu Lang ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROXYAPATITE;

AGE; ANTHROPOMETRIC PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CANCER SURVIVOR; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; ENUCLEATION; FEMALE; GROWTH RETARDATION; HUMAN; IMPLANT; INFANT; MALE; ORBIT; ORBIT DEVELOPMENT; ORBIT DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINOBLASTOMA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VOLUMETRY;

BONE DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DURAPATITE; EYE ENUCLEATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; MALE; ORBIT; ORBITAL IMPLANTS; ORBITAL NEOPLASMS; RETINOBLASTOMA; SURVIVORS; TAIWAN; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 79955029822     PISSN: 00071161     EISSN: 14682079     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2009.175778     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Donaldson SS, Egbert PR, Lee WH. Retinoblastoma. 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997.
2. Waitzman AA, Posnick JC, Armstrong DC, et al. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: part II. Normal values and growth trends. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:118-28.
3. Sekiguchi T, Savara BS, Arya BS. Norms of size and annual increments of six anatomical measures of the cranium in boys and girls from four to fifteen years of age. Am J Phys Anthropol 1973;39:49-56.
4. Farkas LG, Posnick JC, Hreczko TM, et al. Growth patterns in the orbital region: a morphometric study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:315-18.
5. Yago K, Furuta M. Orbital growth after unilateral enucleation in infancy without an orbital implant. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001;45:648-52. (Pubitemid 34081782)
6. Peylan-Ramu N, Bin-Nun A, Skleir-Levy M, et al. Orbital growth retardation in retinoblastoma survivors: work in progress. Med Pediatr Oncol 2001;37:465-70. (Pubitemid 33029642)
7. Hintschich C, Zonneveld F, Baldeschi L, et al. Bony orbital development after early enucleation in humans. Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:205-8. (Pubitemid 32146762)
8. Kaste SC, Chen G, Fontanesi J, et al. Orbital development in long-term survivors of retinoblastoma. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:1183-9. (Pubitemid 27106306)
9. Kaltreider SA, Peake LR, Carter BT. Pediatric enucleation: analysis of volume replacement. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:379-84. (Pubitemid 32207260)
10. Weiss AH, Kousseff BG, Ross EA, et al. Simple microphthalmos. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:1625-30. (Pubitemid 19282014)
11. Su GW, Yen MT. Current trends in managing the anophthalmic socket after primary enucleation and evisceration. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;20:274-80. (Pubitemid 38971780)
12. Quaranta-Leoni FM. Treatment of the anophthalmic socket. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008;19:422-7.
13. Krastinova D, Kelly MB, Mihaylova M. Surgical management of the anophthalmic orbit, part 1: congenital. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;108:817-26. (Pubitemid 32847698)
14. Tucker SM, Sapp N, Collin R. Orbital expansion of the congenitally anophthalmic socket. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:667-71.
15. Mazzoli RA, Raymond WR 4th, Ainbinder DJ, et al. Use of self-expanding, hydrophilic osmotic expanders (hydrogel) in the reconstruction of congenital clinical anophthalmos. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:426-31. (Pubitemid 39281368)
16. Schittkowski MP, Guthoff RF. Injectable self inflating hydrogel pellet expanders for the treatment of orbital volume deficiency in congenital microphthalmos: preliminary results with a new therapeutic approach. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:1173-7. (Pubitemid 44351152)
17. Wolff J. The Law of Bone Remodeling. Berlin: Springer, 1986. (translation of the German 1892 edition).
18. Cepela MA, Nunery WR, Martin RT. Stimulation of orbital growth by the use of expandable implants in the anophthalmic cat orbit. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;8:157-67; discussion 168-9.
19. Tse DT, Pinchuk L, Davis S, et al. Evaluation of an integrated orbital tissue expander in an anophthalmic feline model. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:317-27.
20. Reedy BK, Pan F, Kim WS, et al. The direct effect of intraorbital pressure on orbital growth in the anophthalmic piglet. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:713-18. (Pubitemid 29383696)
21. Apt L, Isenberg S. Changes in orbital dimensions following enucleation. Arch Ophthalmol 1973;90:393-5.
22. Chalasani R, Poole-Warren L, Conway RM, et al. Porous orbital implants in enucleation: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52:145-55. (Pubitemid 46367857)
23. Smith EM Jr, Dryden RM, Tabin GC, et al. Comparison of the effects of enucleation and orbital reconstruction using free-fat grafts, dermis grafts, and porous polyethylene implants in infant rabbits. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;14:415-24.
24. Lyle CE, Wilson MW, Li CS, et al. Comparison of orbital volumes in enucleated patients with unilateral retinoblastoma: hydroxyapatite implants versus silicone implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;23:393-6. (Pubitemid 47442780)
25. Chen D, Heher K. Management of the anophthalmic socket in pediatric patients. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:449-53. (Pubitemid 39281372)