Abiotic correlates of temporal variation of Hypsiboas leptolineatus (Amphibia: Hylidae)

Zoologia

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 703-708

  Hiert, Cristiane ^a   Moura, Mauricio Osvaldo ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDADE ESTADUAL DO CENTRO OESTE   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Anura population structure; Calling pattern; Moon phase; Temporal fluctuations

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIA; ANURA; HYLIDAE;

EID: 79955027003     PISSN: 19844670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1984-46702010000500006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Almeida-Gomes, M.; M. Van Sluys & C.F.D. Rocha. 2007. Calling activity of Crossodactylus gaudichaudii (Anura: Hylodidae) in an Atlantic Rainforest area at Ilha Grande, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Belgian Journal of Zoology 137: 203-207.
2. Aurichio, P. & M.G. Salomão. 2002. Técnicas de coleta e preparação de vertebrados para fins científicos e didáticos. São Paulo, Instituto Pau Brasil de História Natural, 350p.
3. Bastazini, C.V.; J.F.V. Munduruca; P.L.B. Rocha & M.F. Napoli. 2007. Which environmental variables better explain changes in anuran community composition? A case study in the restinga of Mata de São João, Bahia, Brazil. Herpetologica 63 (4): 459-471.
4. Boquimpani-Freitas, L.; R.V. Marra; M. Van Sluys & C.F.D. Rocha. 2007. Temporal niche of acoustic activity in anurans: interspecific and seasonal variation in a neotropical assemblage from south-eastern Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia 28: 269-276.
5. Both, C.; A. Kwet & M. Solé. 2007. The tadpole of Hypsiboas leptolineatus (Braun and Braun, 1977), a species in the Hypsiboas polytaenius clade (Anura: Hylidae). Brazilian Journal of Biology 67 (2): 309-312.
6. Bradshaw, W.E. & C.M. Holzapfel. 2007. Evolution of Animal Photoperiodism. Annual Review of Ecology and Evolution 38: 1-25.
7. Braun, P.C. & C.A.S. Braun. 1977. Nova espécie de Hyla do estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil (Anura, Hylidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia 37 (4): 853-857.
8. Brooke, P.N.; R.A. Alford & L. Schwarzkopf. 2000. Environmental and social factors influence chorusing behaviour in a tropical frog: examining various temporal and spatial scales. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 49 (1): 79-87.
9. Castella, P.R. & R.M. de Britez. 2004. A Floresta com Araucária no Paraná - Conservação e diagnóstico dos Remanescentes Florestais. Brasília, Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 236p.
10. Costa, G.C.; C. Wolfe; D.B. Shepard; J.P. Caldwell & L.J. Vitt. 2008. Detecting the influence of climatic variables on species distributions: a test using GIS niche-based models along a steep longitudinal environmental gradient. Journal of Biogeography 35: 637-646.
11. Crump, M.L. & N.J. Scott Jr. 1994. Standart techniques for inventory and monitoring - Visual encounters surveys, p. 84-91. In: W.R. Heyer; M.A. Donnelly; R.W. McDiarmid; L.C. Hayek & M.S. Foster (Eds). Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity - standard methods for amphibians. Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Insitution Press, XIX+364p.
12. Cruz, C.A.G. & U. Caramaschi. 1998. Definição, composição e distribuição geográfica do grupo de Hyla polytaenia COPE, 1870 (Amphibia, Anura, Hylidae). Boletim do Museu Nacional 392: 1-19.
13. Duellman, W.E. & L. Trueb. 1994. Biology of Amphibians. New York, McGraw-Hill, 670p.
14. Eterovick, P.C.; I.S. Barros & I. Sazima. 2002. Tadpoles of two species in the Hyla polytaenia species group and comparison with other tadpoles of Hyla polytaenia and Hyla pulchella groups (Anura, Hylidae). Journal of Herpetology 36 (3): 512-515.
15. Faivovich, J.; C.F.B. Haddad; P.C.A. Garcia; D. Frost; J.A. Campbell & W.C. Wheeler. 2005. Systematic review of the frog family Hylidae, with especial reference to Hylinae: phylogenetic analysis and taxonomic revision. Bulletin of the American. Museum of Natural History 294: 1-240.
16. Giasson, L.O.M. & C.F.B. Haddad. 2007. Mate choice and reproductive biology of Hypsiboas albomarginatus (Anura: Hylidae) in the Atlantic forest, southeastern Brazil. South American Journal of Herpetology 2 (3): 157-164.
17. Grant, R.A.; E.A. Chadwick & T. Halliday. 2009. The lunar cycle: a cue for amphibian reproductive phenology? Animal Behaviour 78: 349-357.
18. Hatano, F.H.; C.FD. Rocha & M. Van Sluys. 2002. Environmental factors affecting calling activity of a tropical diurnal frog (Hylodes phyllodes: Leptodactylidae). Journal of Herpetology 36: 314-318.
19. Hiert, C. & M.O. Moura. 2007. Anfíbios do Parque Municipal das Araucárias, Guarapuava - Paraná. Guarapuava, Editora UNICENTRO, 41p.
20. IUCN 2009. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.1. Available online at: http://www.iucnredlist.org.html. [Accessed: 1/X/2009].
21. Kwet, A. 2001. Frösche im brasilianischen Araukarienwald. Anurengemeinschaft des Araukarienwaldes von Rio Grande do Sul: Diversität, Reproduktion und Ressourcenaufteilung. Münster, Natur und Tier-Verlag, 192p.
22. Kwet, A. & M. Di-Bernardo. 1999. Anfibios - Amphibien - Amphibians. Porto Alegre, EDIPUCRS, 108p.
23. Lingnau, R. & R.P. Bastos. 2007. Vocalizations of the Brazilian torrent frog Hylodes heyeri (Anura: Hylodidae): Repertoire and influence of air temperature on advertisement call variation. Journal of Natural History 41 (17-20): 1227-1235.
24. Maack, R. 1981. Geografia Física do Estado do Paraná. Rio de Janeiro, José Olympio Editora, 450p.
25. Marsh, D.M. 2000. Variable responses to rainfall by breeding Tungara frogs. Copeia (4): 1104-1108.
26. Narvaes, P. & M.T. Rodrigues. 2005. Visual communication, reproductive behavior, and home range of Hylodes dactylocinus (Anura, Leptodactylidae). Phyllomedusa 4 (2): 147-158.
27. Oseen, K.L. & R.J. Wassersug. 2002. Environmental factors influencing calling in sympatric anurans. Oecologia 133: 616-625.
28. Pierce, B.A. & K.J. Gutzwiller. 2004. Auditory sampling of frogs: detection efficiency in relation to survey duration. Journal of Herpetology 38 (4): 495-500.
29. Roff, D.A. 1992. The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. New York, Chapman and Hall, 465p.
30. Saenz D.; L. Fitzgerald; K. Baum & R. Conner. 2006. Abiotic Correlates of Anuran Calling Phenology: The Importance of Rain, Temperature, and Season. Herpetological Monographs 20: 64-82.
31. Toft, C.A. 1980. Seasonal variation in populations of Panamanian litter frogs and their prey: a comparison of wetter and dryer sites. Oecologia 47: 34-38.
32. Watling, J.I. & M.A. Donnelly. 2002. Seasonal patterns of reproduction and abundance of leaf litter frogs in a central America rainforest. Journal of Zoology 258: 269-276.
33. nd ed., 718p.