A clinically relevant approach to imaging prostate cancer: Self-assessment module

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 196, Issue 3 SUPPL., 2011, Pages

  Verma, Sadhna ^a   Rajesh, Arumugam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b LEICESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diffusion weighted imaging; Dynamic contrast enhancement; Prostate cancer; Prostate cancer imaging; Prostate MR spectroscopy; Prostate MRI

Indexed keywords

CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; GLEASON SCORE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE ADENOCARCINOMA; SELF EVALUATION; SEMINAL VESICLE; SHORT SURVEY; TUMOR VASCULARIZATION; ARTICLE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR;

HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79955010777     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.7295     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. Verma S., Rajesh A. A clinically relevant approach to imaging prostate cancer: review. AJR Integrative Imaging 2011; 196[suppl 1]: S1-S10
2. Coakley F.V., Hricak H. Radiologic anatomy of the prostate gland:A clinical approach. Radiol Clin North Am 2000; 38:15-30 (Pubitemid 30059003)
3. Rajesh A., Coakley F.V., Kurhanewicz J. 3D MR spectroscopic imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 2007; 62:921-929 (Pubitemid 47317139)
4. Rajesh A., Coakley F.V. MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004; 12:557-579 (Pubitemid 38980042)
5. Kellof G.J., Choyke,P.L., Coffey D.S. Challenges in clinical prostate cancer:Role of imaging. AJR 2009; 192:1455-1470
6. Turkbey B., Albert P.S., Kurdzeil K., Choyke P.L. Imaging localized prostate cancer:Current approaches and new developments. AJR 2009; 192:1471-1480
7. Makarov D.V., Sanderson H., Partin A.W., Epstein J.I. Gleason score 7 prostate cancer on needle biopsy:Is the prognostic difference in Gleason scores 4 + 3 and 3 + 4 independent of the number of involved cores? J Urol 2002; 167:2440-2442 (Pubitemid 34533141)
8. Qayyum A., Coakley F.V., Lu Y., et al. Organ-confined prostate cancer:Effect of prior transrectal biopsy on endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging. AJR 2004; 183:1079-1083 (Pubitemid 44185100)
9. Wang L., Hricak H., Kattan M.W., et al. Prediction of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer:Incremental value of adding endorectal MR imaging to the Kattan nomogram. Radiology 2007; 242:182-188 (Pubitemid 44956023)
10. Sala E., Akin O., Moskowitz C.S., et al. Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion:Diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis. Radiology 2006; 238:929-937 (Pubitemid 43289924)