Changing views in paleontology: The story of a giant (Megatherium, Xenarthra)

Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology

Volumn , Issue 9781402069963, 2008, Pages 37-50

  Argot, Christine ^a  

^a MUSÉUM NATIONAL D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE   (France)

Author keywords

Complete skeleton; Fossil mammal; Hind limb; Radial head; Vertebrate paleontology

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954989142     PISSN: 18779077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6997-0_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. Aiello, A., 1985. Sloth hair: unanswered questions. In: Montgomery, G. G. (Ed.), The Ecology and Evolution of Armadillos, Sloths, and Vermilinguas. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington DC, pp. 213–218.
2. Aramayo, S. A., Bianco, T. M. de., 1996. Edad y nuevos hallazgos de icnitas de mamiferos y aves en el yacimiento paleoicnologico de Pehuen-Co (Pleistoceno tardio), provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina. Asociación Paleontológica Argentina (Publicación Especial) 4, 47–57.
3. Babin, C., 1991. De la morphologie à la morphogenèse: un champ ouvert aux investigations paléontologiques. Geobios (Mémoire Spécial) 13, 9–12.
4. Bock, W. J., von Wahlert, G., 1965. Adaptation and the form-function complex. Evolution 19, 269–299.
5. Bryant, H. N., Seymour, K. L., 1990. Observations and comments on the reliability of muscle reconstruction in fossil vertebrates. Journal of Morphology 206, 109–117.
6. Camardi, G., 2001. Richard Owen, morphology and evolution. Journal of the History of Biology 34, 481–515.
7. Casamiquela, R. M., 1974. El bipedismo de los megaterioideos. Estudio de pisadas fósiles en la formación Rio Negro tipica. Ameghiniana 11, 249–282.
8. Casinos, A., 1996. Bipedalism and quadrupedalism in Megatherium: an attempt at biomechanical reconstruction. Lethaia 29, 87–96.
9. Cohen, C., 1994. Le destin du mammouth. Editions du Seuil, Paris, 350 pp.
10. Cuvier, G., 1796. Notice sur le squelette d’une très grande espèce de quadrupède inconnue jusqu’à présent, trouvé au Paraguay, et déposé au cabinet d’Histoire naturelle de Madrid. Magasin ency-clopédique 1, 303–310.
11. Cuvier, G., 1804. Sur le Megatherium, autre animal de la famille des paresseux, mais de la taille du rhinocéros, dont un squelette fossile presque complet est conservé au cabinet royal d’Histoire naturelle à Madrid. Annales du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle 5, 376–387.
12. Cuvier, G., 1812. Sur le Megatherium, autre animal de la famille des paresseux, mais de la taille du rhinocéros, dont un squelette fossile presque complet est conservé au cabinet royal d’histoire naturelle à Madrid. In: Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles de quadrupèdes: où l’on rétablit les caractères de plusieurs espèces d’animaux que les révolutions du globe paroissent avoir détruites. Deterville, Paris, France, Volume IV, part. IV, 19–43.
13. Cuvier, G., 1821–1824. Recherches sur les ossemens fossiles de quadrupèdes: où l’on rétablit les caractères de plusieurs animaux dont les révolutions du globe ont détruit les espèces, 2ème édition. G. Dufour et E. d’Ocagne, Paris, France, 7 vols.
14. Déotte, J. L., 1993. Le Musée, l’origine de l’esthétique. Paris: L’Harmattan. 443 pp.
15. Derieux, V., 1998. Le statut de l’objet paléontologique: du terrain aux collections. Mémoire de D.E.A. non publié, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France. 75 pp.
16. Eigen, E. A., 1997. Overcoming first impressions: Georges Cuvier’s types. Journal of the History of Biology 30, 179–209.
17. Fariña, R. A., Blanco, R. E., 1996. Megatherium, the stabber. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 263, 1725–1729.
18. Figuier, L., 1874. La terre avant le déluge. Paris, Hachette et Cie, 7e édition.
19. Gaudin, T. J., 1995. The ear region of Edentates and the phylogeny of the Tardigrada (Mammalia, Xenarthra). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 15, 672–705.
20. Gaudin, T. J., 2004. Phylogenetic relationships among sloths (Mammalia, Xenarthra, Tardigrada): the craniodental evidence. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 140, 255–305.
21. Gaudry, A., 1895. Le nouveau montage du Megatherium. Bulletin du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle 1, 252–253.
22. Glangeaud, P., 1898. Les nouvelles galeries du Muséum. La Nature 1297, 307–311.
23. Goffart, M., 1971. Function and Form in the Sloth. New York: Pergamon, 225 pp.
24. Gould, S. J., 1993. Dinomania. New York Review of Books 40(14), 51–56.
25. Gould, S. J., 1995. Evolution by walking. Dinosaur in a Haystack. Harmony Books, New York, pp. 248–259.
26. Gould, S. J., Eldredge, N., 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3, 115–151.
27. Hoffstetter, R., 1959. Les rôles respectifs de Bru, Cuvier et Garriga dans les premières études concernant Megatherium. Bulletin du Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, 2ème série, 31, 536–545.
28. Jenkins, F. A. Jr., 1974. The movement of the shoulder in claviculate and aclaviculate mammals. Journal of Morphology 144, 71–84.
29. López-Piñero, J. M., 1988. Juan Bautista Bru (1740–1799) and the description of the genus Megatherium. Journal of the History of Biology 21, 147–163.
30. Martin, R. A., 1990. Estimating body mass and correlated variables in extinct mammals: travels in the fourth dimension. In: Damuth, J., MacFadden, B. J. (Eds.), Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology: Estimation and Biological Implications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 49–68.
31. McKenna, M. C., Bell, S. K., 1997. Classification of Mammals above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, New York, 631 pp.
32. Mendel, F. C., 1985. Adaptations for suspensory behavior in the limbs of two-toed sloths. In: Montgomery, G. G. (Ed.), The Ecology and Evolution of Armadillos, Sloths, and Vermilinguas. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 151–162.
33. Myers, T. J., 2001. Prediction of marsupial body mass. Australian Journal of Zoology 49, 99–118.
34. Owen, R., 1858. On the Megatherium (Megatherium americanum, Blumenbach). Part IV. Bones of the anterior extremities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 261–278 + plates XVIII–XXII.
35. Owen, R., 1860. On the Megatherium (Megatherium america-num, Blumenbach). Part V. Bones of the posterior extremities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 809–829 + plates XXXVII–XLI.
36. Patterson, B., Pascual, R., 1968. Evolution of mammals on southern continents. V. The fossil mammal fauna of South America. The Quarterly Review of Biology 43, 409–451.
37. Pictet, F. J., 1853–1857. Traité de Paléontologie: ou, histoire naturelle des animaux fossiles considérés dans leurs rapports zoologiques et géologiques, 2ème édition. JB. Baillière, Paris, France, 4 vols.
38. Pujos, F., 2002. Contribution à la connaissance des Tardigrades (Mammalia: Xenarthra) du Pléistocène péruvien: systématique, phylogénie, anatomie fonctionnelle et extinction. Ph.D. dissertation, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France, 513 pp.
39. Pujos, F., Salas R., Mattos, J., 2002. Andean lineage of Pleistocene Megatherium: geographical implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22, 97A.
40. Ricqlès, A. de, 1991. Les fossiles sont en forme: quelques aspects du problème des relations entre formes et fonctions en paléontologie. Geobios (Mémoire Spécial) 13, 127–134.
41. Rudwick, M. J. S., 1992. Scenes from Deep Time. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL/London, 280 pp.
42. Rudwick, M. J. S., 1999. A la recherche des monstres perdus. In: Les Cahiers de Science et Vie n°49, coll. 1000 ans de sciences, hors-série n°VII: XIXe siècle, la passion des mondes disparus, pp. 35–41.
43. Scott, W. B., 1903. Mammalia of the Santa Cruz beds: Edentata, Glyptodonta, and Gravigrada. In: Scott, W. B. (Ed.), Reports of the Princeton University Expedition to Patagonia, 1896–1899. Princeton University Press, Stuttgart, Volume V, part I, 2: 107–227 + plates XVII–XXXV.
44. Simpson, G. G., 1980. Splendid Isolation. Yale University Press, New Haven/London, 266 pp.
45. Simpson, G. G., 1984. Discoverers of the Lost World; an Account of Some of Those Who Brought Back to Life South American Mammals Long Buried in the Abyss of Time. Yale University Press, New Haven/London, 222 pp.
46. Steigerwald, J., 2002. Goethe’s morphology: Urphänomene and aesthetic appraisal. Journal of the History of Biology 35, 291–328.
47. Szalay, F. S., 1999. Paleontology and macroevolution: on the theoretical conflict between an expanded synthesis and hierarchic punctuationism. In: Bromage, T. G., Schrenk, F. (Eds.), African Biogeography, Climate Change and Human Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford, pp. 35–61.
48. Szalay, F. S., Schrenk, F., 1998. The middle Eocene Eurotamandua and a Darwinian phylogenetic analysis of “edentates”. Kaupia 7, 97–186.
49. Szalay, F. S., Sargis, E. J., 2001. Model-based analysis of postcranial osteology of marsupials from the Palaeocene of Itaboraí (Brazil) and the phylogenetics and biogeography of Metatheria. Geodiversitas 23, 139–302.
50. Toledo, P. M. de., 1996. Locomotory patterns within the Pleistocene sloths. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Colorado, Department of Geological Sciences, 316 pp.
51. Vizcaíno, S. F., Zárate, M., Bargo, M. S., Dondas, A., 2001. Pleistocene burrows in the Mar del Plata area (Argentina) and their probable builders. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 46, 289–301.
52. Webb, S. D., 1985. The interrelationships of tree sloths and ground sloths. In: Montgomery, G. G. (Ed.), The Ecology and Evolution of Armadillos, Sloths, and Vermilinguas. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 105–112.
53. White, J. L., 1997. Locomotor adaptations in Miocene Xenarthrans. In: Kay, R. F., Madden, R. H., Cifelli, R. L., Flynn, J. J. (Eds.), Vertebrate Paleontology in the Neotropics. The Miocene fauna of La Venta, Colombia. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp. 246–264.
54. Wroe, S., Argot, C., Dickman, C., 2004. On the rarity of big fierce carnivores and primacy of isolation and area: tracking large mammalian carnivore diversity on two isolated continents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 1544, 1203–1211.