Ultrasound in ovarian carcinoma

Cancer of the Ovary

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 94-111

  Webb, Judith ^a  

^a Consultant Radiologist ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954852361     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511545887.008     Document Type: Chapter

References (54)

1. K. Hillaby, N. Aslam, R. Salim, et al. The value of detection of normal ovarian tissue (the ‘ovarian crescent sign’) in the differential diagnosis of adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol(2004), 23:63–7.
2. S. Guerriero, J. L. Alcazar, S. Ajossa, et al. Comparison of conventional colour Doppler imaging and power Doppler imaging for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer: results of a European study. Gynecol Oncol(2001), 83:299–304.
3. A. Kurjak, I. Zalud and Z. Alfirevic. Evaluation of adnexal masses with transvaginal colour ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med(1991), 10:295–9.
4. A. C. Fleischer, W. H. Rodgers, D. M. Kepple, et al. Color Doppler sonography of benign and malignant ovarian masses. Radiographics(1992), 12:879–85.
5. Y. Y. Jeong, E. K. Outwater and H. K. Kang. Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses. Radiographics(2000), 20:1445–70.
6. A. Kurjak, S. Kupesic, V. Sparac and D. Kosuta. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic and power Doppler characterization of ovarian lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynaecol(2000), 16:365–71.
7. J. L. Alcazar and G. Castillo. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional power-Doppler imaging in complex adnexal masses for the prediction of ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol(2005), 192:807–12.
8. M. R. Orden, J. S. Jurvelin and P. P. Kirkinen. Kinetics of a US contrast agent in benign and malignant adnexal tumours. Radiology(2003), 226:405–10.
9. T. J. d’Arcy, V. Jayaram, M. Lynch, et al. Ovarian cancer detected non-invasively by contrastenhanced power Doppler. Br J Obstet Gynaecol(2004), 111:619–22.
10. H. Marret, S. Sauget, B. Giraudeau, et al. Contrast-enhanced sonography helps in discrimination of benign from malignant adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med(2004), 23:1629–39.
11. E. Robbins, R. Kumar and R. S. Cotran. Female genital tract. In: Cotran, R. S., Kumar, V., Collins, T., eds., Robbins Pathologic Basis of Disease, 6th edn. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, (1998), pp. 1035–92.
12. S. Granberg, M. Wikland and I. Jansson. Macroscopic characterization of ovarian tumours and the relation to the histological diagnosis: criteria to be used for ultrasound evaluation. Gynecol Oncol(1989), 35:139–44.
13. J. P. Lerner, I. E. Timor-Tritsch, A. Federman and G. Abramovich. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system. Am J Obstet Gynecol(1994), 170:81–5.
14. B. J. Wagner, J. L. Buck, J. D. Seidman and K. M. McCabe. From the Archives of the AFIP – Ovarian epithelial neoplasms: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics(1994), 14:1351–74.
15. G. Zanetta, A. Lissoni, S. Cha, et al. Preoperative morphological and colour Doppler features of borderline ovarian tumours. Br J Obstet Gynaecol(1995), 102:990–6.
16. M. A. Pascual, F. Tresserra, P. J. Grases, et al. Borderline cystic tumours of the ovary: gray-scale and color Doppler sonographic findings. J Clin Ultrasound(2002), 30:76–82.
17. C. Exacoustas, M. E. Romanini, D. Rinaldo, et al. Preoperative sonographic features of borderline ovarian tumours. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol(2005), 25:50–9.
18. A. J. Megibow, D. H. Hulnick, M. A. Bosniak and E. J. Balthazar. Ovarian metastases: computed tomographic appearances. Radiology(1985), 156:161–4.
19. D. L. Brown, K. H. Zou, C. M. Tempany, et al. Primary versus secondary ovarian malignancy: imaging findings of adnexal masses in the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group Study. Radiology(2001), 219:213–18.
20. S. I. Wolf, B. B. Gosink, M. R. Feldesman, et al. Prevalence of simple adnexal cysts in postmenopausal women. Radiology(1991), 180:65–71.
21. S. C. Modesitt, E. J. Pavlik, F. R. Veland, et al. Risk of malignancy in unilocular ovarian cystic tumours less than 10 cm in diameter. Obstet Gynecol(2003), 102: 594–9.
22. G. Castillo, J. L. Alcazar and M. Jurado. Natural history of sonographically detected simple unilocular adnexal cysts in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol(2004), 92:965–9.
23. M. D. Patel, V. A. Feldstein and S. D. Lipson. Cystic teratomas of the ovary: diagnostic value of sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol(1998), 171:1061–5.
24. E. K. Outwater, E. J. Siegelman and J. L. Hunt. Ovarian teratomas: tumor types and imaging characteristics. Radiographics(2001), 21:475–90.
25. H-C. Kim, S. H. Kim, H. J. Lee, et al. Fluid-fluid levels in ovarian teratomas. Abdom Imaging(2002), 27:100–5.
26. M. D. Patel, V. A. Feldstein, D. C. Chen, et al. Endometriomas: diagnostic performance of US. Radiology(1999), 210:739–45.
27. N. Umaria and J. F. Olliff. Imaging features of pelvic endometriosis. Br J Radiol(2001), 74:556–62.
28. E. Diakoumakis, U. Vieux and B. Seife. Sonographic demonstration of thecoma: report of two cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol(1984), 150:787–8.
29. M. Bazot, M. A. Ghossain, J-N. Buy, et al. Fibrothecomas of the ovary: CT and US findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr(1993), 17:754–9.
30. M. Atri, S. Nazarnia, P. M. Bret, et al. Endovaginal sonographic appearance of benign ovarian masses. Radiographics(1994), 14:747–60.
31. R. Sharony, R. Aviram, A. Fishman, et al. Granulosa cell tumours of the ovary: do they have any unique ultrasonographic and color Doppler flow features? Int J Gynecol Cancer(2001), 11:229–33.
32. M. C. Foshager, L. L. Hood and J. W. Walsh. Masses simulating gynaecologic diseases at CT and MR imaging. Radiographics(1996), 16:1085–99.
33. A. M. Sassone, I. E. Timor-Tritsch, A. Artner, et al. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet Gynecol(1991), 78:70–6.
34. S. M. Stein, S. Laifer-Narin, M. B. Johnson, et al. Differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses: relative value of gray-scale, color Doppler and spectral Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol(1995), 164:381–6.
35. Y. Yamashita, M. Torashima, Y. Hatanake, et al. Adnexal masses: accuracy of characterization with transvaginal US and precontrast and postcontrast MR imaging. Radiology(1995), 194: 557–65.
36. J. N. Buy, M. A. Ghossain, D. Hugol, et al. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone. AJR Am J Roentgenol(1996), 166:385–93.
37. T. Komatsu, I. Konishi, M. Mendai, et al. Adnexal masses: transvaginal US and gadoliniumenhanced MR imaging assessment of intratumoral structure. Radiology(1996), 198:109–15.
38. A. Reles, U. Wein and W. Lichtenegger. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography and conventional sonography in the preoperative assessment of adnexal masses. J Clin Ultrasound(1997), 25:217–25.
39. A. Rieber, K. Nussle, I. Stohr, et al. Preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors with MR imaging: comparison with transvaginal sonography, positron emission tomography and histologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol(2001), 177:123–9.
40. S. A. Sohaib, T. D. Mills, A. Sahdev, et al. The role of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in patients with adnexal masses. Clin Radiol(2005), 60:340–8.
41. A. Kurjak, H. Schulman, A. Sosic, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound color flow and Doppler waveform of the postmenopausal adnexal mass. Obstet Gynecol(1992), 80:917–21.
42. D. L. Brown, M. C. Frates, F. C. Laing, et al. Ovarian masses: can benign and malignant lesions be differentiated with color and pulsed Doppler US? Radiology(1994), 190:330–6.
43. K. A. Jain. Prospective evaluation of adnexal masses with endovaginal gray-scale and duplex and color Doppler US: correlation with pathological findings. Radiology(1994), 191:63–7.
44. D. Levine, V. A. Feldstein, C. J. Babcook and R. A. Filly. Sonography of ovarian masses: poor sensitivity of resistance index for identifying malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol(1994), 162:1355–9.
45. V. L. Schneider, A. Schneider, K. L. Reed and K. D. Hatch. Comparison of Doppler with twodimensional sonography and CA-125 for prediction of malignancy of pelvic masses. Obstet Gynecol(1993), 81:931–8.
46. D. L. Brown, P. M. Doubilet, F. H. Miller, et al. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features. Radiology(1998), 208:103–10.
47. L. Valentin. Comparison of Lerner score, Doppler ultrasound examination and their combination for discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol(2000), 15:143–7.
48. K. Kinkel, H. Hricak, L. Ying, et al. US characterisation of ovarian masses: a meta-analysis. Radiology(2000), 217:803–11.
49. J. A. Spencer, S. E. Swift, N. Wilkinson, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: image-guided peritoneal core biopsy for tumor type and patient care. Radiology(2001), 221:173–7.
50. C. M. C. Tempany, K. H. Zou, S. G. Silverman, et al. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities – report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology(2000), 215:761–7.
51. J. R. Van Nagell, P. D. de Priest, M. B. Reedy, et al. The efficacy of transvaginal sonographic screening in asymptomatic women at risk for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol(2000), 77:350–6.
52. I. J. Jacobs, S. J. Skates, N. MacDonald, et al. Screening for ovarian cancer: a pilot randomised controlled trial. Lancet(1999), 353:1207–10.
53. U. Menon. Ovarian cancer screening. Can Med Assoc J(2004), 171:323–4.
54. K. Togashi. Ovarian cancer: the clinical role of US, CT and MRI. Eur Radiol(2003), 13(Suppl 4):87–104.