Democratic approximation of lexicographic preference models

Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 175, Issue 7-8, 2011, Pages 1290-1307

  Yaman, Fusun ^a   Walsh, Thomas J ^b   Littman, Michael L ^c   Desjardins, Marie ^d  

^a BBN TECHNOLOGIES   (United States)

^b University of Arizona   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Baltimore County   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian methods; Lexicographic models; Preference learning

Indexed keywords

BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE; BAYESIAN METHODS; EXISTING METHOD; HUMAN DECISIONS; LEXICOGRAPHIC MODELS; LEXICOGRAPHIC PREFERENCES; PREFERENCE LEARNING; REAL-WORLD;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

ALGORITHMS;

EID: 79954836123     PISSN: 00043702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. D. Bertsekas, and J. Tsitsiklis Parallel and Distributed Computation: Numerical Methods 1997 Athena Scientific
2. C. Boutilier, R.I. Brafman, C. Domshlak, H.H. Hoos, and D. Poole CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 21 2004 135 191 (Pubitemid 41525900)
3. W. Cohen, R. Schapire, and Y. Singer Learning to order things Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 10 1999 243 270 (Pubitemid 30573909)
4. A.M. Colman, and J.A. Stirk Singleton bias and lexicographic preferences among equally valued alternatives Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 40 4 December 1999 337 351
5. G. Dantzig, A. Orden, and P. Wolfe The generalized simplex method for minimizing a linear form under linear inequality restraints Pacific Journal of Mathematics 5 1955 183 195
6. R.M. Dawes The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making American Psychologist 34 1979 571 582
7. J. Dombi, C. Imreh, and N. Vincze Learning lexicographic orders European Journal of Operational Research 183 2 2007 748 756 (Pubitemid 46891146)
8. P. Fishburn Lexicographic orders, utilities and decision rules: A survey Management Science 20 11 1974 1442 1471
9. J.K. Ford, N. Schmitt, S.L. Schechtman, B.M. Hults, and M. Doherty Process tracing methods: contributions, problems and neglected research issues Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43 1989 75 117
10. J. Fürnkranz, and E. Hüllermeier Pairwise preference learning and ranking Proc. ECML-03 Cavtat-Dubrovnik 2003 Springer-Verlag 145 156 (Pubitemid 37230973)
11. G. Gigerenzer, and D.G. Goldstein Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality Psychological Review 103 4 1996 650 669 (Pubitemid 126664717)
12. J. Jones, M. desJardins, Learning of branching lexicographic preference models. Tech. Rep. TR-CS-10-05, UMBC Dept. of CS&EE, June 2010.
13. Netflix The Netflix prize rules http://www.netflixprize.com/rules 2009
14. A. Quesada Negative results in the theory of games with lexicographic utilities Economics Bulletin 3 20 2003 1 7
15. R. Rivest Learning decision lists Machine Learning 2 3 1987 229 246
16. M. Schmitt, and L. Martignon On the complexity of learning lexicographic strategies Journal of Machine Learning Research 7 2006 55 83 (Pubitemid 43022940)
17. Sports illustrated http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/olympics/2008/medals/ tracker/ 2008
18. L. Torrey, J. Shavlik, T. Walker, R. Maclin, Relational macros for transfer in reinforcement learning, in: Proceedings of the Seventeenth Conference on Inductive Logic Programming, Corvallis, Oregon, 2007.
19. A. Tversky Intransitivity of preferences Psychological Review 76 1969 31 48
20. M.R. Westenberg, and P. Koele Multi-attribute evaluation processes: methodological and conceptual issues Acta Psychologica 87 1994 65 84 (Pubitemid 124007710)
21. F. Yaman, M. desJardins, More-or-less CP-networks, in: Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 2007.