Deformation and consolidation around encased stone columns

Geotextiles and Geomembranes

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 268-276

  Castro, Jorge ^a   Sagaseta, César ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTABRIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Analytical solution; Consolidation; Elasto plastic; Encased stone columns; Settlement reduction

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; APPLIED LOADS; AXIAL SYMMETRY; CLOSED FORM; CONSOLIDATION TIME; DILATANCY ANGLE; ELASTIC MATERIALS; ELASTIC-PLASTIC MATERIAL; ELASTO-PLASTIC; ENCASED STONE COLUMNS; MOHR COULOMB YIELD CRITERION; NON-ASSOCIATED FLOW RULE; PARAMETRIC STUDY; REPLACEMENT RATIO; SETTLEMENT REDUCTION; SOFT SOILS; STONE COLUMN; SURROUNDING SOILS; UNIFORM LOADS; UNIT CELLS;

ELASTOPLASTICITY; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; SOILS; STRESS CONCENTRATION;

TENSILE STRENGTH;

COLUMN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONSOLIDATION; COULOMB CRITERION; DEFORMATION MECHANISM; DESIGN; ELASTOPLASTICITY; GROUND SETTLEMENT; MOHR THEORY; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; SOFT SOIL; SOIL REINFORCEMENT; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 79954789651     PISSN: 02661144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Balaam N.P., Booker J.R. Analysis of rigid rafts supported by granular piles. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 1981, 5:379-403.
2. Barron R.A. Consolidation of fine-grained soils by drain wells. Transactions ASCE 1948, 113:718-742.
3. Brinkgreve R.B.J. Plaxis Finite Element Code for Soil and Rock Analysis 2007, 2D, version 8, Balkema, Rotterdam.
4. Castro J., Sagaseta C. Consolidation around stone columns. Influence of column deformation. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 2009, 33(7):851-877.
5. Gniel J., Bouazza A. Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2009, 27(3):167-175.
6. Kempfert H.-G. Ground improvement methods with special emphasis on column-type techniques. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Geotechnics of Soft Soils-Theory and Practice 2003, 101-112. SCMEP, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.
7. Malarvizhi S.N., Ilamparuthi K. Comparative study on the behaviour of encased stone column and conventional stone column. Soils and Foundations 2007, 47(5):873-885.
8. Murugesan S., Rajagopal K. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: numerical evaluation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2006, 24(6):349-358.
9. Murugesan S., Rajagopal K. Studies on the behavior of single and group of geosynthetic encased stone columns. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2010, 136(1):129-139.
10. Pulko B., Majes B. Simple and accurate prediction of settlements of stone column reinforced soil. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 2005, vol. 3:1401-1404. Osaka, Japan.
11. Pulko B., Majes B., Logar J. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: analytical calculation model. Geotextiles and Geomembranes 2011, 29(1):29-39.
12. Raithel M., Kempfert H.G. Calculation models for dam foundations with geotextile coated sand columns. Proceedings of the International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 2000, GeoEngg-2000, Melbourne.
13. Sharma S.R., Phanikumar B.R., Nagendra G. Compressive load response of granular piles reinforced with geogrids. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 2004, 41(1):187-192.
14. Wehr J. The undrained cohesion of the soil as criterion for the column installation with a depth vibrator. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Vibratory Pile Driving and Deep Soil Vibratory Compaction 2006, TRANSVIB, Paris, pp. 157-162.
15. Yoo C. Performance of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in embankment construction: numerical investigation. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 2010, 136(8):1148-1160.