The structural response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to impact loading

Composite Structures

Volumn 93, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 1300-1308

  Wang, Zhihua ^a,b   Jing, Lin ^a   Ning, Jianguo ^b   Zhao, Longmao ^a  

^a TAIYUAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Experimental investigation; Impact loading; Sandwich beams

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; COMPOSITE BEAMS AND GIRDERS; DEFORMATION; DYNAMIC LOADS; FOAMS; HONEYCOMB STRUCTURES; METALS; SANDWICH STRUCTURES; TRANSDUCERS;

ALUMINUM HONEYCOMB CORES; CLAMPED SANDWICH BEAMS; CLOSED-CELL ALUMINUM FOAM; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; IMPACT LOADINGS; SANDWICH BEAMS; STRUCTURAL CONFIGURATIONS; TRANSVERSE DEFLECTION;

LOADING;

EID: 79954784846     PISSN: 02638223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2010.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Vinson JR. The Behavior of Sandwich Structures of Isotropic and Composite Materials. Pennsylvania: Technomic Publishing Company; 1999.
2. Abrate S. Impact on Composite Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
3. Rizov V, Shipsha A, Zenkert D. Indentation study of foam core sandwich composite panel. Compos Struct 2005;69:95-102.
4. Meo M, Vignjevic R, Marengo G. The response of honeycomb sandwich panels under low-velocity impact loading. Int J Mech Sci 2005;47:1301-25.
5. Roach AM, Jones N, Evans KE. The penetration energy of sandwich panel elements under static and dynamic loading. Part II. Compos Struct 1998;42:135-52.
6. Goldsmith W, Sackman JL An experimental study of energy absorption in impact on sandwich plates. Int J Impact Eng 1992;12(2):241-62.
7. Fleck NA, Deshpande VS. The resistance of clamped sandwich beams to shock loading. J Appl Mech 2004;71:386-401.
8. Radford DD, Fleck NA. The response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to shock loading. Int J Impact Eng 2003;32:968-87.
9. Xue Z, Hutchinson JW. A comparative study of blast-resistant metal sandwich plates. Int J Impact Eng 2004;30:1283-305.
10. Langdon GS, Lemanski SL, Nurick GN, et al. Behavior of fiber-metal laminates subjected to localized explosive blast loading. Part I. Experimental observations. Int J Impact Eng 2007;34:1202-22.
11. Lemanski SL, Nurick GN, Langdon GS, et al. Behavior of fiber-metal laminates subjected to localized explosive blast loading. Part II. Quantitative analysis. Int J Impact Eng 2007;34:1223-45.
12. Avila, Antonio F. Failure mode investigation of sandwich beams with functionally graded core. Compos Struct 2007;81:323-30.
13. Steeves, Craig A, Fleck NA. Material selection in sandwich beam construction. Scripta Mater 2004;50:1335-9.
14. RabczukT, KimJY, Samaniego E, et al. Homogenization of sandwich structures. Int J Numer Methods Eng 2004;7:1009-27.
15. Liang Y, Spuskanyuk AV, Flores SE, et al. The response of metallic sandwich panels of water blast. J Appl Mech 2007;74:81-99.
16. Radford DD, Mcshane GJ, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. The response of clamped sandwich plates with metallic foam cores to simulated blast loading. Int J Solids Struct 2006;43:2243-59.
17. Hexcel Co. HexWeb® Honeycomb Energy Absorption System Design Data, 2005.
18. Qiu X, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. Impulsive loading of clamped monolithic and sandwich beams over a central patch. J Mech Phys Solids 2005;53: 1015-46.
19. Radford DD, Fleck NA, Deshpande VS. The response of clamped sandwich beams subjected to shock loading. Int J Impact Eng 2006;32:968-87.
20. Radford DD, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA. The use of metal foam projectiles to simulate shock loading on a structure. Int J Impact Eng 2005;31(9):1152-71.
21. Qin Qinghua, Wang TJ. A theoretical analysis of the dynamic response of metallic sandwich beam under impulsive loading. Eur J Mech/Solids 2009;28:1014-25.