Aerodynamic shape optimization using efficient evolutionary algorithms and unstructured CFD solver

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 270-276

  Jahangirian, A ^a   Shahrokhi, A ^b  

^a AMIRKABIR UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

^b AEROSPACE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Iran)

Author keywords

Aerodynamic shape optimization; CFD solver; Genetic Algorithm; Neural Networks

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMIC SHAPE OPTIMIZATION; AIRFOIL SHAPE; CFD SOLVER; COMPUTATIONAL COSTS; COMPUTATIONAL TIME; CONVERGENCE RATES; DESIGN SPACES; FLOW CONDITION; MULTI-LAYER PERCEPTRON NEURAL NETWORKS; OPTIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; OPTIMIZATION GENETIC ALGORITHMS; REAL-CODED; TRAINING DATA; TRANSONIC AIRFOILS;

AERODYNAMICS; AIRFOILS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; FUNCTION EVALUATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; NETWORK LAYERS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION;

SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 79954778130     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.02.010     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Goldberg D.E. Genetic algorithm in search, optimization and machine learning 1989, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts.
2. Quagliarella D., Cioppa A.D. Genetic algorithm applied to the aerodynamic design of transonic airfoils. J Aircraft 1995, 32:4.
3. Shahrokhi A., Jahangirian A. Airfoil shape parameterization for optimum Navier-Stokes design with genetic algorithm. Aerospace Sci Technol 2007, 11(6).
4. Husken M., Jin Y., Sendhoff B. Structure optimization of neural network for evolutionary design optimization. J Soft Comput 2005, 9(1).
5. Giannakoglou K.C., Papadimitriou D.I., Kampolis I.C. Aerodynamic shape design using evolutionary algorithms and new gradient-assisted metamodels. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 2006, 195.
6. Jahangirian A., Hadidoolabi M. Unstructured moving grid for implicit calculation of unsteady compressible viscous flows. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 2005, 47.
7. Jahangirian A, Johnston LJ. Automatic generation of adaptive unstructured grid for viscous flow applications. In 5th international conference on numerical grid generation in CFD. Mississippi State University; 1996.
8. Anderson K.W., Bonhaus D.L. Airfoil design on unstructured grids for turbulent flows. AIAA 1999, 37(2).
9. Oyama A., Obayashi Sh., Nakahashi K. Real coded adaptive range genetic algorithm and its application to aerodynamic design. Lecture notes in computer science 2000, vol. 1917. Springer-Verlag, New York.
10. Oyama A, Obayashi Sh, Nakahashi K, Nakamura T. Aerodynamic optimization of transonic wing design based on evolutionary algorithm, In Third international conference on non linear problems in aviation and aerospace methods and software. Daytona Beach, FL, USA; May 10-12, 2000.
11. Sobieczky H. Parametric airfoils and wings. Notes on numerical fluid mechanics 1998, Vieweg.
12. Klein M, Sobieczky H. Sensitivity of aerodynamic optimization to parameterized target function. In Proceedings of the international symposium. On inverse problems in engineering mechanics (ISIP 2001). Nagano, Japan; February 2001.
13. Arakawa M., Hagiwara I. Development of adaptive real range genetic algorithm. JSME Int J Series C 1998, 41(4).
14. Sasaki D., Obayashi Sh. Efficient search for trade-offs by adaptive range multi-objective genetic algorithms. J Aerospace Comput Inform Commun 2005, 2(1).
15. Buche D., Schraudolph N., Koumoutsakos P. Accelerating evolutionary algorithms with Gaussian process fitness function models. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part C 2004.
16. Ray T., Smith W. A surrogate assisted parallel multi objective evolutionary algorithm for robust engineering design. J Eng Opt 2006, 38(8).
17. Shahrokhi A., Jahangirian A. A surrogate assisted evolutionary optimization method with application to transonic airfoil design. J Eng Opt 2010, 37(4).