Compact fluorescent lights and the impact of convenience and knowledge on household recycling rates

Waste Management

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1300-1306

  Wagner, Travis P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLECTION SYSTEMS; COMPACT FLUORESCENT LIGHTS; CURRENT COLLECTION; ENERGY COST; HOUSEHOLD RECYCLING; KNOWLEDGE REQUIREMENTS; MARKETING CAMPAIGN; PRIMARY FACTORS; PUBLIC SUBSIDIES; RECYCLING RATE; RETAIL PRICE;

FLUORESCENCE; MARKETING; MERCURY (METAL); SURVEYS;

RECYCLING;

MERCURY;

HOUSEHOLD SURVEY; MERCURY (ELEMENT); RECYCLING; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPACT FLUORESCENT LIGHT; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST; DOMESTIC WASTE; ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT; ENERGY COST; FEMALE; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECYCLING; SOCIAL MARKETING; UNITED STATES; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HOUSEHOLD PRODUCTS; LIGHTING; MAINE; MERCURY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECYCLING; WASTE PRODUCTS;

MAINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79954672322     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.01.017     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ando A.W., Gosselin A.Y. Recycling in multifamily dwellings: does convenience matter?. Econ. Inq. 2005, 43:426-438.
2. Association of Lighting and Mercury Recyclers [ALMR], 2004. National mercury-lamp recycling rate and availability of lamp recycling services in the US, Available from:, accessed October 16, 2010. http://www.lamprecycle.org/public/images/docs/ALMR_capacity_statement.2004.%20pdf.pdf.
3. Australian Greenhouse Office, 2006. International CFL market review: a study of seven Asia-pacific economies. Available from:, accessed October 16, 2010. http://www.energyrating.gov.au/library/pubs/2006-cfl-international-review.pdf.
4. Barnes P., Bacon R. Maine's model recycling program. In Proceedings of the 2008 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings 2008, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, DC, pp. 2-15 to 2-26.
5. Best H. Structural and ideological determinants of household waste recycling: results from an empirical study in Cologne, Germany. Nat. Culture 2009, 4:167-190.
6. California Informal Working Group on Lighting, 2009. California compact fluorescent light (CFL) market overview. Available from:, accessed on October 16, 2010. http://www.socalgas.com/calenergy/docs/lighting/CFLMarketOverview.pdf.
7. Cho Y.-L., Lam S.-P. Measuring responsible environmental behavior: self-reported and other-reported measures and their differences in testing a behavioral model. Environ. Behav. 2009, 43:53-71.
8. Corral-Verdugo V. Dual realities of conservation behavior: self-reports vs. Observations of re-use and recycling behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 1997, 17:135-145.
9. Corral-Verdugo, V., Bernache, G., Encinas, L., Garibaldi, L.C., 1994-1995. A comparison of two measures of reuse and recycling behavior: self-report and material culture. J. Environ. Syst. 23, 313-327.
10. Eckleman M.J., Anastas P.J., Zimmerman J.B. Spatial assessment of net mercury emissions from the use of fluorescent bulbs. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:8564-8570.
11. González-Torre P.L., Adenso-Di{dotless}áz B. Influence of distance on the motivation and frequency of household recycling. Waste Manage. 2005, 25:15-23.
12. Goonan, T.G., 2006. Mercury flow through the mercury-containing lamp sector of the economy of the United States. US Geological Survey, 2006. Available from:, verified on October 15, 2010. http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2006/5264/sir20065264.pdf.
13. Lansana F.M. Distinguishing potential recyclers from nonrecyclers: a basis for developing recycling strategies. J. Environ. Ed. 1992, 23:16-23.
14. Maine Department of Environmental Protection [MDEP], 2008. Report regarding the recycling of fluorescent lamps and consumer education efforts, Available from: accessed on July 23, 2010. http://www.maine.gov/dep/rwm/homeowner/fluorescent.htm.
15. Maine Department of Environmental Protection [MDEP], 2010. Mercury-added lamps: a strategy for improving recycling rates. Available from: accessed on October 15, 2010. http://www.maine.gov/dep/rwm/publications/legislativereports/lamprptfeb2010final.doc.
16. Maine Public Utilities Commission [MPUC]. Efficiency Maine, 2008. Annual Report. Available from: accessed on July 23, 2010. http://www.efficiencymaine.com/pdf/EMO14758_EMAnn.Rept_v11.pdf.
17. Maine Public Utilities Commission [MPUC]. Efficiency Maine, 2009. Annual Report, Available from: accessed on July 23, 2010. http://www.efficiencymaine.com/pdf/EM_AnnualReport2009_FINAL.pdf.
18. Margai F.L. Analyzing changes in waste reduction behavior in a low-income urban community following a public outreach program. Environ. Behav. 1997, 29:769-792.
19. Marquardt, R., 2002. Compact fluorescent lamp recycling project phase i, draft report background research and program options. Available from:, accessed on July 22, 2010. http://www.zerowaste.org/cfl/IMAGES_A/phase_I_rpt.pdf.
20. McKeown A., Swire N. Strong Growth in compact fluorescent bulbs reduces electricity demand. World Watch. 2009, 22:29.
21. Merse, C., 2009. Environmental Protection Specialist, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, Personal communication, June 6, 2009.
22. Milfont T.L. The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behavior. Environmentalist 2009, 29:263-269.
23. Nixon H., Saphores J.M. Information and the decision to recycle: results from a survey of US households. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 2009, 52:257-277.
24. Northeast Waste Management Officials' Association [NWMOA], 2009. Review of compact fluorescent lamp recycling initiatives in the US & internationally, Available from:, accessed on July 23, 2010. http://www.newmoa.org/prevention/mercury/lamprecycle/CFLRecyclingReport.pdf.
25. Peretz J.H., Tonn B.E., Folz D.H. Explaining the performance of mature municipal solid waste recycling programs. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 2005, 48:627-650.
26. Saphores J.M., Nixon H., Ogunseitan O.A., Shapiro A.A. Household willingness to recycler electronic waste: an application to California. Environ. Behav. 2006, 38:183-208.
27. Sidique S.F., Lupi F., Joshi S.F. The effects of behavior and attitudes on drop-off recycling activities. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 2010, 54:163-170.
28. Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition, 2004. Poison PCs and toxic TVs. Available from:, accessed on November 27, 2010. http://www.svtc.org/site/DocServer/ppcttv2004.pdf?docID=301.
29. Skumatz L.A. Pay as you throw in the US: implementation, impacts, and experience. Waste Manage. 2008, 28:2778-2785.
30. Skumatz, L., Fuchs, L., Woods, R., Violette, D., 2004. Energy Star® Products, Marketing, and Keep Cool Programs: Phase I Market Characterization, Assessment, and Causality (MCAC) Evaluation", Skumatz Economic Research Associates, Inc. (SERA) and Summit Blue Consulting, Prepared for NYSERDA, Albany, NY.
31. United States Census Bureau, 2007. Computer and internet use in the United States, Table 1. Available from:, accessed on July 23, 2010. http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/computer/2007.html.
32. Unites States Department of Energy [US DOE], 2009. Big results, bigger potential. CFL market profile, March 2009. Available from:, accessed on July 23, 2010. http://www.energystar.gov/ia/products/downloads/CFL_Market_Profile.pdf.
33. United States Department of Energy [US DOE], 2010. Available from:, accessed on July 22, 2010. http://www.eere.energy.gov/consumer/your_home/lighting_daylighting/index.cfm/mytopic=12050.
34. United States Government Accountability Office Electronic waste: strengthening the role of the federal government in encouraging recycling and reuse. Report to the United States Congress. GAO-06-47 2005, Washington, DC.
35. Van Selm M., Jankowski N.W. Conducting online surveys. Qual. Quant. 2006, 40:435-456.
36. Vicente P., Reis E. Factors influencing households' participation in recycling. Waste Manage. Res. 2008, 8:140-146.
37. Vining J., Ebreo A. What makes a recycler? A comparison of recyclers and nonrecyclers. Environ. Behav. 1990, 22:55-73.
38. Wagner T.P. Shared responsibility for managing electronic waste: a case study of Maine, USA. Waste Manage. 2009, 29:3014-3021.
39. Wroblewski, T., 2009. Manager of Regulatory Compliance & Environmental Programs, The Home Depot, Atlanta, GA, USA, Personal communication, October 5, 2009.