Discordant views of experts and laypersons on the adoption of new fertility technology

Medical Care

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 420-423

  Brezis, Mayer ^a   Malkiel, Avishay ^b   Chinitz, David ^c   Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani ^d  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^b SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^c HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Assisted reproductive technology; Bioethics; Expert bias; Fertility; Health care policy; Oocyte cryopreservation; Wisdom of crowds

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; CRYOPRESERVATION; FERTILITY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INFERTILITY THERAPY; ISRAEL; MEDICAL STUDENT; OOCYTE DEVELOPMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC OPINION;

EID: 79954608935     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182028ca3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Redberg RF, Walsh J. Pay now, benefits may follow-the case of cardiac computed tomographic angiography. N Engl J Med. 2008;359: 2309-2311.
2. Dondorp W, De Wert G. Fertility preservation for healthy women: ethical aspects. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:1779.
3. Malkiel A, Chinitz D, Soleymani-Lehmann L, et al. Oocytes cryopreservation-When? Who should pay? (in Hebrew). Harefuah. In press.
4. Oktay K, Cil AP, Bang H. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:70-80. (Pubitemid 43962981)
5. Lornage J, Salle B. Ovarian and oocyte cryopreservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007;19:390-394. (Pubitemid 47067105)
6. Marhhom E, Cohen I. Fertility preservation options for women with malignancies. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62:58.
7. Practice Committee of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Essential elements of informed consent for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a practice committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2008;90: S134-S135.
8. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. ASRM practice committee response to Rybak and Lieman: elective self-donation of oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2009;92:1513-1514.
9. Surowiecki J. The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many are Smarter Than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations. 1st ed. New York, NY: Doubleday; 2004.
10. BusinessDictionary.com. Available at: http://wwwbusinessdictionarycom/ definition/cognitive-biashtml (Accessed July 11, 2010).
11. Read JG. The sources of gender role attitudes among Christian and Muslim Arab-American women. Sociol Relig. 2003;64:207-222.
12. Lavee Y, Katz R. The family in Israel-between tradition and modernity. Marriage Fam Rev. 2003;35:193-217.
13. Chinitz D, Galai N. Public preferences for health care coverage under national health insurance in Israel. In: Second International Conference on Priorities in Health Care; October 8-10, 1998; London, United Kingdom.
14. Chinitz D, Meislin R, Alster-Grau I. Values, institutions and shifting policy paradigms: expansion of the Israeli national health insurance basket of services. Health Policy. 2009;90:37-44.
15. Fowler FJ Jr, Berwick DM, Roman A, et al. Measuring public priorities for insurable health care. Med Care. 1994;32:625-639.
16. Sackett DL. The sins of expertness and a proposal for redemption. BMJ. 2000;320:1283.
17. Croskerry P. Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med. 2002;9:1184-1204. (Pubitemid 35291548)
18. Brezis M, Cohen R. Interactive learning in medicine: socrates in electronic clothes. QJM. 2004;97:47-51. (Pubitemid 38195702)
19. Lundeberg MA, Fox PW, Punccohar J. Highly confident but wrong: gender differences and similarities in confidence judgments. J Educ Psychol. 1994;86:114-121.
20. Guttman N. Bringing the mountain to the public: dilemmas and contradictions in the procedures of public deliberation initiatives that aim to get "ordinary citizens" to deliberate policy issues. Commun Theory. 2007;17:411-438. (Pubitemid 350020116)
21. Florin D, Dixon J. Public involvement in health care. BMJ. 2004; 328:159-161. (Pubitemid 38117472)
22. Guttman N, Shalev C, Kaplan G, et al. What should be given a priority-costly medications for relatively few people or inexpensive ones for many? The health parliament public consultation initiative in Israel. Health Expect. 2008;11:177-188. (Pubitemid 351725001)
23. Winnicott D, Winnicott C, Shepherd R, et al. Deprivation and Delinquency. London, United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis; 1984.
24. Lewis T, Amini F, Lannon R. A General Theory of Love. New York, NY: Random House; 2000.
25. Eisler RT. The Real Wealth of Nations: Creating a Caring Economics. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc; 2007.
26. Folbre N, Nelson JA. For Love or Money-Or Both? J Econ Perspect. 2000;14:123-140.
27. McCarty C, House M, Harman J, et al. Effort in phone survey response rates: the effects of vendor and client-controlled factors. Field Methods. 2006;18:172-188.