Laboratory Diagnosis of Prosthetic Joint Infection, Part II

Clinical Microbiology Newsletter

Volumn 33, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 63-70

  Gomez, Eric ^a   Patel, Robin ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; RIFAMPICIN;

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITY; ANTIBODY DETECTION; ARTHRODESIS; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIAL LOAD; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BACTERIUM DETECTION; BIOFILM; COAGULASE NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCUS; DEBRIDEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; GRAM STAINING; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; INFECTION CONTROL; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; MINIMUM INHIBITORY CONCENTRATION; MOLECULAR DIAGNOSIS; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROPIONIBACTERIUM; PROSTHESIS INFECTION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SERODIAGNOSIS; SKIN FLORA; SONICATE FLUID CULTURE; SYNOVIAL FLUID; TISSUE CULTURE; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 79954607414     PISSN: 01964399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinmicnews.2011.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Chimento G.F., Finger S., Barrack R.L. Gram stain detection of infection during revision arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1996, 78:838-839.
2. Ghanem E., et al. Periprosthetic infection: where do we stand with regard to Gram stain?. Acta Orthop. 2009, 80:37-40.
3. Della Valle C.J., et al. The role of intraoperative Gram stain in revision total joint arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty 1999, 14:500-504.
4. Morgan P.M., et al. The value of intraoperative Gram stain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2009, 91:2124-2129.
5. Johnson A.J., et al. Should gram stains have a role in diagnosing hip arthroplasty infections?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010, 468:2387-2391.
6. Trampuz A., et al. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357:654-663.
7. Neut D., et al. Detection of biomaterial-associated infections in orthopedic joint implants. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003, 413:261-268.
8. Ince A., et al. Is " aseptic" loosening of the prosthetic cup after total hip replacement due to nonculturable bacterial pathogens in patients with low-grade infection?. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 39:1599-1603.
9. Berbari E.F., et al. Culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45:1113-1119.
10. Malekzadeh D., et al. Prior use of antimicrobial therapy is a risk factor for culture-negative prosthetic joint infection. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010, 468:2039-2045.
11. Atkins B.L., et al. Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty. The OSIRIS Collaborative Study Group. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36:2932-2939.
12. Schäfer P., et al. Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2008, 47:1403-1409.
13. Trampuz A., et al. Sonication of explanted prosthetic components in bags for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection is associated with risk of contamination. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44:628-631.
14. Dietz F.R., et al. The importance of positive bacterial cultures of specimens obtained during clean orthopaedic operations. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1991, 73:1200-1207.
15. Brady L.P., Enneking W.F., Franco J.A. The effect of operating-room environment on the infection rate after Charnley low-friction total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1975, 57:80-83.
16. Fitzgerald R.H., et al. Bacterial colonization of wounds and sepsis in total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1973, 55:1242-1250.
17. Kamme C., Lindberg L. Aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in deep infections after total hip arthroplasty: differential diagnosis between infectious and non-infectious loosening. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1981, 154:201-207.
18. Sivadon V., et al. Use of genotypic identification by sodA sequencing in a prospective study to examine the distribution of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species among strains recovered during septic orthopedic surgery and evaluate their significance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43:2952-2954.
19. Shah N.B., et al. Laboratory and clinical characteristics of Staphylococcus lugdunensis prosthetic joint infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48:1600-1603.
20. Dramis A., et al. What is the significance of a positive Propionibacterium acnes culture around a joint replacement?. Int. Orthop. 2009, 33:829-833.
21. Topolski M.S., et al. Revision shoulder arthroplasty with positive intraoperative cultures: the value of preoperative studies and intraoperative histology. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006, 15:402-406.
22. Mikkelsen D.B., et al. Culture of multiple peroperative biopsies and diagnosis of infected knee arthroplasties. Apmis 2006, 114:449-452.
23. Levine B.R., Evans B.G. Use of blood culture vial specimens in intraoperative detection of infection. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2001, 382:222-231.
24. Font-Vizcarra L., et al. Blood culture flasks for culturing synovial fluid in prosthetic joint infections. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010, 468:2238-2243.
25. Bjerkan G., Witso E., Bergh K. Sonication is superior to scraping for retrieval of bacteria in biofilm on titanium and steel surfaces in vitro. Acta Orthop. 2009, 80:245-250.
26. Trampuz A., et al. Molecular and antibiofilm approaches to prosthetic joint infection. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003, 414:69-88.
27. Kobayashi N., et al. The use of newly developed real-time PCR for the rapid identification of bacteria in culture-negative osteomyelitis. Joint Bone Spine 2006, 73:745-747.
28. Gristina A.G., Costerton J.W. Bacterial adherence to biomaterials and tissue. The significance of its role in clinical sepsis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1985, 67:264-273.
29. Nguyen L.L., et al. Detecting bacterial colonization of implanted orthopaedic devices by ultrasonication. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2002, 403:29-37.
30. Esteban J., et al. Evaluation of quantitative analysis of cultures from sonicated retrieved orthopedic implants in diagnosis of orthopedic infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46:488-492.
31. Tollefson D.F., et al. Surface biofilm disruption. Enhanced recovery of microorganisms from vascular prostheses. Arch. Surg. 1987, 122:38-43.
32. Del Pozo J.L., et al. Pilot study of association of bacteria on breast implants with capsular contracture. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2009, 47:1333-1337.
33. Sherertz R.J., et al. Three-year experience with sonicated vascular catheter cultures in a clinical microbiology laboratory. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1990, 28:76-82.
34. Mason P.K., et al. Sonication of explanted cardiac rhythm management devices for the diagnosis of pocket infections and asymptomatic bacterial colonization. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol. 2011, 34:143-149.
35. Bonkat G., et al. Improved detection of microbial ureteral stent colonisation by sonication. World J. Urol. 2010, 29:133-138.
36. Tunney M.M., et al. Improved detection of infection in hip replacements. A currently underestimated problem. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1998, 80:568-572.
37. Dailey A., et al. Hip or knee prosthesis sonicate cultures have a shorter time to positivity compared to periprosthetic tissue cultures, abstr. D-746. Abstracts of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (ICAAC) 49th Annual Meeting 2009, American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
38. Deirmengian C., Lonner J.H., Booth R.E. The Mark Coventry Award: White blood cell gene expression: a new approach toward the study and diagnosis of infection. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005, 440:38-44.
39. Deirmengian C., et al. Synovial fluid biomarkers for periprosthetic infection. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2010, 468:2017-2023.
40. Rafiq M., et al. Serological detection of gram-positive bacterial infection around prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2000, 82:1156-1161.
41. Tunney M.M., et al. Detection of prosthetic hip infection at revision arthroplasty by immunofluorescence microscopy and PCR amplification of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37:3281-3290.
42. Costerton J.W. Biofilm theory can guide the treatment of device-related orthopaedic infections. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2005, 437:7-11.
43. Vandercam B., et al. Amplification-based DNA analysis in the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. J. Mol. Diagn. 2008, 10:537-543.
44. Moojen D.J., et al. Identification of orthopaedic infections using broad-range polymerase chain reaction and reverse line blot hybridization. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 2007, 89:1298-1305.
45. van der Heijden I.M., et al. Detection of bacterial DNA in serial synovial samples obtained during antibiotic treatment from patients with septic arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1999, 42:2198-2203.
46. Canvin J.M., et al. Persistence of Staphylococcus aureus as detected by polymerase chain reaction in the synovial fluid of a patient with septic arthritis. Br. J. Rheumatol. 1997, 36:203-206.
47. Achermann Y., et al. Improved diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection by multiplex PCR of sonication fluid from removed implants. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48:1208-1214.
48. De Man F.H., et al. Broad-range PCR in selected episodes of prosthetic joint infection. Infection 2009, 37:292-294.
49. Clarke M.T., et al. Polymerase chain reaction can detect bacterial DNA in aseptically loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2004, 427:132-137.
50. Panousis K., et al. Poor predictive value of broad-range PCR for the detection of arthroplasty infection in 92 cases. Acta Orthop. 2005, 76:341-346.
51. Tarkin I.S., et al. PCR rapidly detects methicillin-resistant staphylococci periprosthetic infection. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2003, 414:89-94.
52. Kobayashi N., et al. Rapid and sensitive detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus periprosthetic infections using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2009, 64:172-176.
53. Nickel J.C., et al. Tobramycin resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa cells growing as a biofilm on urinary catheter material. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1985, 27:619-624.
54. Ramage G., et al. Standardized method for in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2001, 45:2475-2479.
55. Ceri H., et al. The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37:1771-1776.
56. Sandoe J.A., et al. Measurement of ampicillin, vancomycin, linezolid and gentamicin activity against enterococcal biofilms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2006, 57:767-770.
57. Buchholz H.W., et al. Management of deep infection of total hip replacement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1981, 63:342-353.
58. Freeman M.A., et al. The management of infected total knee replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1985, 67:764-768.
59. Goksan S.B., Freeman M.A. One-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1992, 74:78-82.
60. Wroblewski B.M. One-stage revision of infected cemented total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1986, 211:103-107.
61. Raut V.V., Siney P.D., Wroblewski B.M. One-stage revision of infected total hip replacements with discharging sinuses. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1994, 76:721-724.
62. Raut V.V., Siney P.D., Wroblewski B.M. One-stage revision of total hip arthroplasty for deep infection. Long-term followup. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1995, 321:202-207.
63. Callaghan J.J., Katz R.P., Johnston R.C. One-stage revision surgery of the infected hip. A minimum 10-year follow up study. Clin. Orthop Relat. Res. 1999, 369:139-143.
64. Windsor R.E., et al. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. Further follow-up and refinement of indications. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1990, 72:272-278.
65. Insall J.N., Thompson F.M., Brause B.D. Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1983, 65:1087-1098.
66. Ocguder A., et al. Two-stage total infected knee arthroplasty treatment with articulating cement spacer. Arch. Orthopaedic Trauma Surg. 2010, 130:719-725.
67. Wilde A.H., Ruth J.T. Two-stage reimplantation in infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1988, 236:23-35.
68. Brodersen M.P., et al. Arthrodesis of the knee following failed total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1979, 61:181-185.
69. Clegg J. The results of the pseudarthrosis after removal of an infected total hip prosthesis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 1977, 59:298-301.
70. Petty W., Goldsmith S. Resection arthroplasty following infected total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1980, 62:889-896.
71. Pavoni G.L., et al. Conservative medical therapy of prosthetic joint infections: retrospective analysis of an 8-year experience. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2004, 10:831-837.
72. Nelson J.P. Deep infection following total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1977, 59:1042-1044.
73. Fedorka C.J., et al. Functional ability after above-the-knee amputation for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2011, 469:1024-1032.
74. Hanssen A.D., Rand J.A., Osmon D.R. Treatment of the infected total knee arthroplasty with insertion of another prosthesis. The effect of antibiotic-impregnated bone cement. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1994, 309:44-55.
75. Trippel S.B. Antibiotic-impregnated cement in total joint arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 1986, 68:1297-1302.
76. Widmer A.F., et al. Correlation between in vivo and in vitro efficacy of antimicrobial agents against foreign body infections. J. Infect. Dis. 1990, 162:96-102.
77. El Helou O.C., et al. Efficacy and safety of rifampin containing regimen for staphylococcal prosthetic joint infections treated with debridement and retention. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2010, 29:961-967.