Motive-oriented therapeutic relationship in brief psychodynamic intervention for patients with depression and personality disorders

Journal of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1017-1027

  Kramer, Ueli ^a   Rosciano, Alessandra ^a   Pavlovic, Mirjana ^a   Berthoud, Laurent ^a   Despland, Jean Nicolas ^a   De Roten, Yves ^a   Caspar, Franz ^b  

^a DEPT UNIV DE PSYCHIATRIE ADULTE   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Depression; Outcome; Personality disorders; Plan analysis; Therapeutic relationship

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SWITZERLAND;

ADULT; COMORBIDITY; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PSYCHOTHERAPY, BRIEF; SWITZERLAND;

EID: 79954559994     PISSN: 00219762     EISSN: 10974679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.20806     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Benjamin, L.S. (2003). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders. New York: Guilford Press.
3. Berthoud, L., Kramer, U., de Roten, Y., Despland, J.-N., & Caspar, F. (2011). Using plan analysis in psychotherapeutic case formulation for borderline personality disorder. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. Caspar, F. (2007). Plan analysis. In T.D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulations (2nd ed., pp. 251-289). New York: Guilford Press.
5. Caspar, F. (2009). Plan analysis in action. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 5(2), 25-27.
6. Caspar, F., & Berger, T. (2011). Allgemeine psychotherapie [General psychotherapy]. In B. Dulz, S. Herpertz, O.F. Kernberg, & U. Sachsse (Eds.), Handbuch der Borderline-Störungen (2. Auflage), in press.
7. Caspar, F., & Ecker, S. (2008). Treatment of an avoidant patient with comorbid psychopathology: A plan analysis perspective. Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session, 64(2), 139-153.
8. Caspar, F., & Grosse Holtforth, M. (2009). Responsiveness-Eine entscheidende prozessvariable in der psychotherapie [Responsiveness-a decisive process-variable in psychotherapy]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 38(1), 61-69.
9. Caspar, F., Grossmann, C., Unmüssig, C., & Schramm, E. (2005). Complementary therapeutic relationship: Therapist behavior, interpersonal patterns, and therapeutic effects. Psychotherapy Research, 15(1-2), 91-105.
10. Caspar, F., Pessier, J., Stuart, J., Safran, J.D., Samstag, L.W., & Guirguis, M. (2000). One step further in assessing how interpretations influence the process of psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 10(3), 309-320.
11. Caspar, F., Wirtz, M., & Spiegelhalder, C. (2011). How to test the agreement in the use of complex data: The example of plan analysis as a psychotherapeutic case formulation approach. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12. Curtis, J.T., & Silberschatz, G. (1994). The plan formulation method. Psychotherapy Research, 4, 197-207.
13. Derogatis, L.R. (1994). Symptom Checklist-90-Revised: Administration scoring and procedures manual (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: National Computers Systems.
14. Despland, J.-N., de Roten, Y., Drapeau, M., Currat, T., Beretta, V., & Kramer, U. (2009). The role of alliance in the relationship between therapist competence and outcome in brief psychodynamic psychotherapy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197(5), 362-367.
15. Despland, J.-N., Drapeau, M., & de Roten, Y. (2005). A naturalistic study of the effectiveness of a 4-session format: The Brief Psychodynamic Investigation (BPI). Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention, 5(4), 268-278.
16. Despland, J.-N., Michel, L., & de Roten, Y. (2010). Intervention Psychodynamique Brève [Brief Psychodynamic Intervention]. Paris: Masson.
17. Eells, T.D. (2007) (Ed.). Handbook of psychotherapy case formulations (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
18. Fernàndez-Alvarez, H., Clarkin, J.F., Salgueiro, M. del C., & Critchfield, K.L. (2006). Participant factors in treating personality disorders. In L.G. Castonguay & L.E. Beutler (Eds.), Principles of therapeutic change that work (pp. 203-218). New York: Oxford University Press.
19. First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B.W., & Gibbons, M. (2004). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (French translation by M. Cottraux and J. Cottraux). New York: Biometrics Research Dpt.
20. Gilliéron, E. (2004). Le premier entretien en psychothérapie [The intake interview in psychotherapy]. Paris: Dunod.
21. Grawe, K. (1980). Die diagnostisch-therapeutische Funktion der Gruppeninteraktion in verhaltenstherapeutischen Gruppen [The diagnostic-therapeutic function of group interaction in behavioral treatment groups]. In K. Grawe (Ed.), Verhaltenstherapie in gruppen (pp. 88-223). München: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
22. Grawe, K. (1992). Komplementäre Beziehungsgestaltung als Mittel zur Herstellung einer guten Therapiebeziehung [Complementary therapeutic relationship as a mean for the establishment of a good therapeutic relationship]. In J. Margraf & J.C. Brengelmann (Eds.), Die therapeut-patient-beziehung in der verhaltenstherapie (pp. 215-244). München: Röttger-Verlag.
23. Grawe, K. (1998). Psychologische therapie [Psychological therapy]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
24. Grawe, K., Caspar, F., & Ambühl, H. (1990). Differentielle psychotherapieforschung: Vier therapieformen im vergleich: Die Berner therapievergleichsstudie [Differential psychotherapy research: Comparing four forms of psychotherapies: The Bernese comparative trial]. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 19, 294-376.
25. Hill, C.E., & Knox, S. (2009). Processing the therapeutic relationship. Psychotherapy Research, 19(1), 13-29.
26. Jacobson, N.S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 12-19.
27. Kiesler, D.J. (1982). Interpersonal theory for personality and psychotherapy. In J.C. Anchin & D.J. Kiesler (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychotherapy (pp. 3-24). New York: Pergamon.
28. Kramer, U. (2009a). Individualizing exposure therapy for PTSD: A case study. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 5(2), 1-24.
29. Kramer, U. (2009b). Between manualized treatments and principle-guided psychotherapy: A commentary. Pragmatic Case Studies in Psychotherapy, 5(2), 45-51.
30. Kramer, U., Belz, M., Pomini, V., Follack, C., & Caspar, F. (2010). L'apport de l'Analyse des Plans à la pratique psychothérapeutique: Etudes de Cas [The usefulness of plan analysis in psychotherapeutic practice]. Revue Francophone de Clinique Cognitivo-Comportementale, XV(3), 19-32.
31. Kramer, U., Berger, T., & Caspar, F. (2009). Psychotherapeutic case conceptualization using plan analysis for bipolar affective disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(4), 352-367.
32. Martin, D.J., Garske, J.P., & Davis, K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome ant other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(3), 438-450.
33. Miller, G.A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K.H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt.
34. Norcross, N.C. (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work. Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Pariente, P., & Guelfi, J.D. (1990). Inventaires d'auto-évaluation de la psychopathologie chez l'adulte [Self-report inventories in adult psychopathology]. Psychiatrie Psychobiologique, 5, 49-63.
36. Sachse, R. (2003). Klärungsorientierte Psychotherapie [Clarification-oriented psychotherapy]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
37. Sachse, R. (2004). Persönlichkeitsstörungen. Leitfaden für die Praxis [Personality disorders. Manual for the Practice]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
38. Sampson, H., & Weiss, J. (1989). Testing hypotheses: The approach of the Mount Zion Psychotherapy Research Group. In L.S. Greenberg & W.M. Pinsof (Eds.), The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook (pp. 591-613). New York: Guilford Press.
39. Schmitt, G.M., Kammerer, E., & Holtmann, M. (2003). Förderung interaktioneller Kompetenzen von Medizinstudierenden. Entwicklung, Erprobung und Evaluation eines Curriculums für de Psychosomatikunterricht [Enhancement of interactional competencies in medical students. Development, Evaluation and Assessment of Curriculum for Training in Psychosomatics]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie, 53, 390-398.
40. Sifneos, P. (1987). Short-term dynamic psychotherapy: Evaluation and technique. New York: Plenum.
41. Silberschatz, G., Fretter, P.B., & Curtis, J.T. (1986). How do interpretations influence the process of psychotherapy? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 646-652.
42. Smith, T.L., Barrett, M.S., Benjamin, L.S., & Barber, J.P. (2006). Relationship factors in treating personality disorders. In L.G. Castonguay & L.E. Beutler (Eds.), Principles of therapeutic change that work (pp. 219-238). New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Stiles, W.B., Honos-Webb, L., & Surko, M. (1998). Responsiveness in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5, 439-458.
44. Wirtz, M., & Caspar, F. (2002). Beurteilerübereinstimmung und beurteilerreliabilität [Inter-rater accordance and inter-rater reliability]. Göttingen: Hogrefe.