Dissatisfaction after bilateral multifocal intraocular lens implantation: An electrophysiology study

Journal of Refractive Surgery

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 309-312

  Shimizu, Kimiya ^a   Ito, Misae ^a  

^a KITASATO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CASE REPORT; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; EYE EXAMINATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LENS IMPLANT; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT DISSATISFACTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATTERN VISUAL EVOKED CORTICAL POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ACUITY;

AGED; DEVICE REMOVAL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; LENSES, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; VISION DISORDERS; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 79954557077     PISSN: 1081597X     EISSN: 19382391     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20100804-01     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Elgohary MA, Beckingsale AB. Effect of posterior capsular opacification on visual function in patients with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses. Eye. 2008;22(5):613-619. (Pubitemid 351712355)
2. Woodward MA, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(6):992-997.
3. Ito M, Shimizu K. Pseudophakic monovision. Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today Europe. October 2009:64-66.
4. Sloper JJ, Collins AD. Reduction in binocular enhancement of the visual evoked potential during development accompanies increasing stereoacuity. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1998;35(3):154-158. (Pubitemid 28265682)
5. Odom JV, Bach M, Brigell M, Holder GE, McCulloch DL, Tormene AP, Vaegan. ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials (2009 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2010;120(1):111-119.
6. Salati C, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Brusini P. Pupil size influence on the intraocular performance on the multifocal AMO-Array intraocular lens in elderly patients. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007;17(4):571-578. (Pubitemid 47605766)
7. Lehmann D, Fender DH. Monocularly evoked electroencephalogram potentials: influence of target structure presented to the other eye. Nature. 1967;215(5097):204-205.
8. Spekreijse H, van der Tweel LH, Regan D. Interocular sustained suppression: correlations with evoked potential amplitude and distribution. Vision Res. 1972;12(3):521-526.
9. Mizota A, Hoshino A, Adachi-Usami E, Fujimoto N. Binocular summation in visual evoked cortical potential in patients who have significantly different P100 peak latencies in their two eyes. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2004;242(9):762-766. (Pubitemid 39386376)
10. Allison T, Wood CC, Goff WR. Brain stem auditory, patternreversal visual, and short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials: latencies in relation to age, sex, and brain and body size. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983;55(6):619-636. (Pubitemid 13099638)