An approach for the metamodel of the framework for a partial agile method adaptation

Information Technology and Control

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 71-82

  Mikulenas, Gytenis ^a   Butleris, Rimantas ^a   Nemuraite, Lina ^a  

^a KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Agile method; Framework; Metamodel; Partial adaptation

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954534438     PISSN: 1392124X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5755/j01.itc.40.1.194     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. L. Ablonskis, L. Nemuraite. Discovery of complex model implementation patterns in source code. Information Technology and Control, 2010, 39(4), 291-300.
2. L. Ablonskis, L. Nemuraite. Discovery of model implementation patterns in source code. Information Technology and Control, 2010, 39(1), 68-76.
3. P. Abrahamsson, J. Warsta, M.K. Siponen, J. Ronkainen. New directions on agile method A comparative analysis. In proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society, 2003, 244-254.
4. [Agile Alliance. Principles behind the Agile Manifesto. Available from: http://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html [Accessed 20 September 2009].
5. [S.W. Ambler. Agile Adoption Rate Survey: March 2007. Available from: http://www.ambysoft.com/downloads/surveys/AgileAdoption2007.ppt [Accessed 15 April 2009].
6. S.W. Ambler. Agile Modeling: Effective Practices for eXtreme Programming and the Unified Process. John Wiley & Sons, 2002.
7. A. Armonas, L. Nemuraite. Using attributes and merging algorithms for transforming OCL expressions to code. Information Technology and Control, 2009, 38(4), 283-293.
8. I. Attarzadeh, O.S. Hock. New direction in project management success: Base on smart methodology selection. In proceedings of Information Technology Symposium, Springer, 2008, 1-9.
9. K. Beck. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Second Edition. Addison Wesley Professional, 2004.
10. B. Boehm, R. Turner. Using Risk to Balance Agile and Plan-Driven Methods. Computer, 2003, 36(6), 57-66.
11. J. Charvat. Project Management Methodologies - Selecting, Implementing, and Supporting Methodologies and Processes for Projects. John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
12. A. Cockburn. Selecting a Project's Methodology. IEEE Software, 2000, 7(4), 64-71.
13. A. Cockburn, J. Highsmith. DSDM Business Focused Development, Addison-Wesley, 2003.
14. A. Cockburn. Crystal Clear A Human-Powered Methodology for Small Teams. Addison Wesley Professional, 2004.
15. J. Drobka, D. Noftz, R. Raghu. Piloting XP on Four Mission-Critical Projects, IEEE Computer, 2004, 21(6), 70-75.
16. D.G. Firesmith, B. Henderson-Sellers. The OPEN Process Framework, an introduction. Addison-Wesley, 2002
17. E. Georgiadou, K.V. Siakas, E. Berki. Agile quality or depth of reasoning: applicability versus suitability respecting stakeholders' needs. In proceedings of Agile software development quality assurance, Information Science Reference, 2007, 23-55.
18. D. Greer, G. Ruhe. Software release planning: An evolutionary and iterative approach. Information and Software Technology, 2004, 46(4), 243-253.
19. B. Henderson-Sellers, C. Gonzalez-Perez, J. Ralyte. Comparison of Method Chunks and Method Fragments for Situational Method Engineering. In proceedings of Software Engineering ASWEC 2008, IEEE Computer Society, 2008, 479-488.
20. ISO/IEC. Software Engineering - Metamodel for Development Methodologies. ISO/IEC 24744:2007 (E), 2007.
21. R.E. Jeffries, A. Anderson, C. Hendrickson. Extreme Programming Installed, Addison-Wesley, 2000.
22. P. Kroll, B. MacIsaac. Agility and Discipline Made Easy: Practices from OpenUP and RUP. Addison Wesley Professional, 2006.
23. C. Lan, K. Mohan, X. Peng, B. Ramesh. How Extreme does Extreme Programming Have to be? Adapting XP Practices to Large-scale Projects. In proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Press, 2004, 342-250.
24. L. Layman, L. Williams, L. Cunninghan. Exploring extreme programming in context: An industrial case study. In proceedings of the Agile Development Conference, IEEE Computer Society, 2004, 32-41.
25. [J. Lynch. New Standish Group report shows more project failing and less successful projects. Available from: http://www.standishgroup.com/newsroom/chaos_2009.php [Accessed 2 September 2009].
26. G. Mikulenas, R. Butleris. An approach for modeling technique selection criterions. In proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Information and Software Technologies, IT 2009, Kaunas University of Technology, 2009, 207-216.
27. G. Mikulenas, K. Kapocius. An Approach for Prioritizing Agile Practices for Adaptation. In proceedings of 18th International Conference on Information Systems Development, Springer, 2010, 485-498.
28. G. Mikulenas, K. Kapocius. A Framework for Decomposition and Analysis of Agile Methodologies during their Adaptation. In proceedings of 18th International Conference on Information Systems Development, Springer, 2010, 547-560.
29. G. Mikulenas, R. Butleris. An approach for constructing evaluation model of suitability assessment of agile methods using analytic hierarchy process. Electronics and Electrical Engineering, 2010, 10(106), 99-104.
30. E. Mnkandla, B. Dwolatzky. Agile methodologies selection toolbox. In proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering Advances ICSEA '07, IEEE Computer Society, 2007, 72-72.
31. M. Mirakhorli, A.K. Rad, F.S. Aliee, A. Mirakhorli, M. Pazoki. RDP Technique: Take a Different Look at XP for Adoption.Software Engineering. In proceedings of the 19th Australian Conference on Software Engineering, ASWEC 2008. IEEE Computer Society, 2008, 656-662.
32. I. Mirbel. Method chunk federation. In proceedings of workshops on Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis and Design, Namur University Press, 2006, 407-418.
33. OMG. Software Process Engineering Metamodel Specification. OMG Document Number: formal/2002-11-14, 2002.
34. [OPEN Process Framework Repository Organization (OPFRO). OPF repository. Available from: http://www.opfro.org/ [Accessed 9 February 2010]
35. K. Schwaber. Agile Project Management with Scrum. Microsoft Press, 2004.
36. D. Silingas, R. Butleris. Towards implementing a framework for modeling software requirements in MagicDraw UML. Information Technology and Control, 2009, 38(2), 153-164.
37. A. Smaizys, O. Vasilecas. Business Rules Based Agile ERP Systems Development. Informatica, 2009, 20(3), 439-460.
38. L. Tutkute, R. Butleris, T. Skersys. An approach for formation of leverage coefficients-based recommendations in social network. Information Technology and Control, 2008, 37(3), 245-254.