The tonic as triad: Key profiles as pitch salience profiles of tonic triads

Music Perception

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 333-365

  Parncutt, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Pitch; Salience; Stability; Tonality; Triad

Indexed keywords

EID: 79954514220     PISSN: 07307829     EISSN: 15338312     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/MP.2011.28.4.333     Document Type: Article

References (192)

1. Aarden, B. J. (2003). Dynamic melodic expectancy (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
2. Agawu, V. K. (2003). Representing African music: Postcolonial notes, queries, positions. New York: Routledge.
3. Allesch, C. G., & Krakauer, P. M. (2005-2006). Understanding our experience of music: What kind of psychology do we need? Musicae Scientiae, Special Issue, 41-63.
4. Auhagen, W. (1994). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur auditiven Tonalitatsbestimmung in Melodien. [Experimental investigations of the auditory determination of tonality in melodies]. Kassel: Bosse.
5. Auhagen, W., & Vos, P. G. (2000). Experimental methods in tonality induction research: A review. Music Perception, 17, 417-436.
6. Avianius, J. (1581). Isagoge in libros musicaepoeticae [Introduction to books about musical composition]. Erfurt: Baumann.
7. Bain, J. (2003). Theorizing the cadence in the music of Machaut. Journal of Music Theory, 47, 325-362.
8. Balkwill, L.-L., Thompson, W. R, & Matsunaga, R. (2004). Recognition of emotion in Japanese, Western, and Hindustani music by Japanese listeners. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 337-349. (Pubitemid 40019530)
9. Beach, D. (1967). The functions of the six-four chord in tonal music. Journal of Music Theory, 11, 2-31.
10. Becker, J. (1986). Is Western art music superior? Musical Quarterly, 72, 341-359.
11. Bello, J. p., Daudet, L., & Sandler, M. B. (2006). Automatic piano transcription using frequency and timedomain information. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions: Audio, Speech and Language Processing, 14, 2242-2251.
12. Berry, J. W., poortinga, Y. H., Segall, M. H., & Dasen, p. R. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
13. Besseler, H. (1952). Tonalharmonik und Vokalklang: Eine Antwort an Rudolf von Ficker. [Tonal harmony and vocal sonority: An answer to Rudolf von Ficker]. Acta Musicologica, 24, 131-146.
14. Bharucha, J. J. (1998). Neural nets, temporal composites and tonality. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 413-440). New York: Academic Press.
15. Blackburn, B. J. (1987). On compositional process in the Fifteenth Century. Journal of the American Musicology Society, 40, 210-284.
16. Bryden, J. R., & Hughes, D. G. (1969). An index of Gregorian chant. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Budge, H. (1943). A study of chord frequencies. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
18. Budrys, R., & AmbrazeviČius, R. (2008). 'Tonal' vs 'atonal': Perception of tonal hierarchies. In E. Cambouropoulos, R. Parncutt, M. Solomos, D. Stefanou, & C. Tsougras (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Interdisciplinary Musicology (pp. 36-37). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University.
19. Bull, M., & Back, L. (2003). The auditory culture reader. Oxford, UK: Berg.
20. Burmeister, J. (1606). Musicapoetica [Musical composition]. Rostock: Myliander.
21. Burns, E. M. (1999). Intervals, scales and tuning. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), Psychology of music (2nd ed., pp. 215-264). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
22. Butler, D. (1989). Describing the perception of tonality in music: A critique of the tonal hierarchy theory and a proposal for a theory of intervallic rivalry. Music Perception, 6, 219-242.
23. Campion, T. (c. 1618). A new way of making foure parts in counterpoint. London, UK: Snodham.
24. Caplin, w. E. (1998). Classical form. New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Cazden, N. (1980). The definition of consonance and dissonance. International Review of the Aesthetics and Sociology of Music, 2, 123-168.
26. Christensen, T. (1993). Music theory and its histories. In C. Hatch & D. W. Bernstein (Eds.), Music theory and the exploration of the past (pp. 9-39). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27. Clarke, E. F. (2005). Ways of listening: An ecological approach to the perception of musical meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Cochlaeus, J. (1507). Musica. Cologne: Landen.
29. Cook, N. (1989). Music theory and "good comparison": A Viennese perspective. Journal of Music Theory, 33, 117-41.
30. Crocker, R. (1962). Discant, counterpoint, and harmony. Journal of the American Musicology Society, 15, 1-21.
31. CrüGer, J. (1630). Synopsis musicae [Outline of music(al composition)]. Berlin: Kall.
32. Cuddy, L. L. (1997). Tonal relations. In I. Deliège & J. A. Sloboda (Eds.), Perception and cognition of music (pp. 329-352). Hove, East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
33. Dahlhaus, C. (1986). Seconda pratica und musikalische Figurenlehre [Second practice and the theory of musical figures]. In L. Finscher (Ed.), Claudio Monteverdi: Festschrift Reinhold Hammerstein [Claudio Monteverdi: Essays in tribute to Reinhold Hammerstein] (pp. 141-150). Laaber: Laaber-Verlag.
34. Dahlhaus, C. (1990). Untersuchungen über dieEntstehungder harmonischen Tonalität [Studies on the origin of harmonic tonality] (R. O. Gjerdingen, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1967)
35. de Podio, G. (1495). Ars musicorum [The art of music]. Valencia: Hagenbach & Hutz.
36. Deutsch, D. (1980). The processing of structured and unstructured tonal sequences. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 381-389.
37. DeWitt, L. A., & Crowder, R. G. (1987). Tonal fusion of consonant musical intervals: The oomph in Stumpf. Perception and Psychophysics, 41, 73-84. (Pubitemid 17018197)
38. Domingos, P. (1999). The role of Occam's razor in knowledge discovery. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3, 409-425.
39. Duke, R. A. (1985). Wind instrumentalists' intonational performance of selected musical intervals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 33, 101-112.
40. Dyer, J. (2007). The place of musica in Medieval classifications of knowledge. Journal of Musicology, 24, 3-71.
41. Eberlein, R. (1993). Ein rekursives System als Ursache der Gestalt der tonalen Klangsyntax [A recursive system as origin of the form of tonal-harmonic syntax]. Systematische Musikwissenschaft, 1, 339-351.
42. Eberlein, R. (1994). Die Entstehung der tonalen Klangsyntax [The emergence of tonal-harmonic syntax]. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
43. Eberlein, R., & Fricke, j.P. (1992). Kadenzwahrnehmung und Kadenzgeschichte-ein Beitrag zu einer Grammatik der Musik [Perception and history of the cadence]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
44. Fétis, F. j. (1840). Esquisse de l'histoire de l'harmonie considérée comme art et comme science systématique [Sketch of the history of harmony considered as art and as systematic science] . Paris: Revue et Gazette Musicale de Paris.
45. Finscher, L. (Ed., 1994-98). Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart (Sachteil) [Music in history and the present (by subject)]. Kassel: Bärenreiter.
46. Flotzinger, R. (1984). Zu Perotin und seinem "Sederunt" [On Perotin and his "Sederunt"]. In W. Breig, R. Brinkmann, & E. Budde (Eds.), Analysen: Beiträge zu einer Problemgeschichte des Komponierens [Analyses: Contributions to a theoretical history of composition] (pp. 14-28). Stuttgart: Steiner.
47. Forte, A. (1977). The structure of atonal music. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48. Forte, A., & Gilbert, S. E. (1982). An introduction to Schenkerian analysis. New York: Norton.
49. Fuller, S. (1986). On sonority in Fourteenth-Century polyphony: Some preliminary reflections. Journal of Music Theory, 30, 35-70.
50. Fyk, J. (1995). Melodic intonation, psychoacoustics, and the violin. Zielona Góra, Poland: Organon.
51. Gafori, F. (1496). Practica musicae [Musical practice]. Brescia: Angelo Britannico.
52. Gallo, F. A., Groth, R., palisca, C. v., & Rempp, F. (1989). Italienische Musiktheorie im 16. und 17. Jahrhundert [Italian music theory in the 16th and 17th centuries]. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
53. Gauldin, R. (1983). The cycle-7 complex: Relations of diatonic set theory to the evolution of ancient tonal systems. Music Theory Spectrum, 5, 39-55.
54. Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 26, 309-320.
55. Gibson, E. J. (1969). Principles of perceptual learning and development. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
56. Gibson, E. J., & Adolph, K. E. (1992). The perceived self in infancy. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 119-121.
57. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
58. Haar, J. (2002). Orlande [Roland] de Lassus [Orlando di Lasso]. In L. Macy (Ed.), New Grove dictionary of music online. Retrieved January 29, 2003.
59. Harnisch, o. S. (1608). Artis musicae delineatio [Outline of musical art]. Frankfurt: Stein.
60. Harrison, D. (1994). Harmonic function in chromatic music: A renewed dualist theory and an account of its precedents. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
61. Hauptmann, M. (1853). Die Natur der Harmonik und der Metrik [The nature of harmony and meter] . Leipzig: Breitkopf und Härtel.
62. Heinichen, J. D. (1711). Neu erfundene undgrundliche Anweisung zu vollkommener Erlernung des General-Basses [Original, thorough method to achieve perfection in figured bass] . Hamburg: B. Schillers.
63. Helmholtz, H. L. F. von (1954). On the sensations of tone as a physiological basis for the theory of music (A. J. Ellis, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1863)
64. Honing, H. (2006). Computational modeling of music cognition: A case study on model selection. Music Perception, 23, 365-376.
65. Huron, D. (1993). Chordal-tone doubling and the enhancement of key perception. Psychomusicology, 12, 73-83.
66. Huron, D. (2001). Tone and voice: A derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles. Music Perception, 19, 1-64.
67. Huron, D. (2006a). Issues and prospects in studying cognitive cultural diversity. In S. Lipscombe et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Music Perception and Cognition, Evanston, IL (pp. 93-96). Adelaide: Causal.
68. Huron, D. (2006b). Sweet expectation: Music and the psychology of expectation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69. Huron, D., & parncutt, R. (1993). An improved theory of tonality perception incorporating pitch salience and echoic memory. Psychomusicology, 12, 154-171.
70. Huron, D., & veltman, J. (2006). A cognitive approach to Medieval mode: Evidence for an historical antecedent to the major/minor system. Empirical Musicology Review, 1, http://hdl.handle.net/1811/24072.
71. Hutchinson, W., & Knopoff, L. (1978). The acoustic component of Western consonance. Interface, 7, 1-29.
72. Hutsteiner, T. (2000). Effekte der Stimmführung auf die Tonhöhensalienz musikalischer Akkorde [Effects of voice leading on the pitch salience of musical chords] (Unpublished Master's thesis). University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
73. Hyer, B. (2001). Tonality. In S. Sadie (Ed.), The new Grove dictionary of music and musicians (2nd ed., pp. 583-594). London: MacMillan.
74. Jansson, E. v., & Sundberg, J. (1975). Long-time-averagespectra applied to analysis of music. Part I: Method and general applications. Acustica, 34, 15-19.
75. JÄrvinen, T. (1995). Tonal hierarchies in jazz improvisation. Music Perception, 12, 415-437.
76. Johnson, J. (2002). Who needs classical music? Cultural choice and musical value. New York: Oxford University Press.
77. Jorgenson, D. (1963). A résumé of harmonic dualism. Music and Letters, 44, 31-42.
78. Judd, C. C. (1998). Introduction: Analyzing early music. In C. C. Judd (Ed.), Tonal structures in early music (pp. 3-13). New York: Garland.
79. Juslin, p. N. (2005). From mimesis to catharsis: Expression, perception, and induction of emotion in music. In D. Miell, R. MacDonald, & D. J. Hargreaves (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 85-115). New York: Oxford University Press.
80. Kameoka, A., & Kuriyagawa, M. (1969). Consonance theory Part II: Consonance of complex tones and its calculation method. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 1460-1469.
81. Keller, M. S. (2007). Why is music so ideological, and why do totalitarian states take it so seriously? Journal of Musicological Research, 26, 91-122.
82. Knopoff, L., & Hutchinson, W. (1983). Entropy as a measure of style: The influence of sample length. Journal of Music Theory, 27, 75-97.
83. Krumhansl, C. L. (1990). Cognitive foundations of musical pitch. New York: Oxford University Press.
84. Krumhansl, C. L. (2004). The cognition of tonality-as we know it today. Journal of New Music Research, 33, 253-268.
85. Krumhansl, C. L., & Kessler, E. j. (1982). Tracing the dynamic changes in perceived tonal organization in a spatial representation of musical keys. Psychological Review, 89, 334-368.
86. Krumhansl, C. L., & Shepard, R. N. (1979). Quantification of the hierarchy of tonal functions within a diatonic context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 579-594.
87. Krumhansl, C. L., Louhivuori, j., Toiviainen, P., jarvinen, T., & Eerola, T. (1999). Melodic expectation in Finnish spiritual folk hymns: Convergence of statistical, behavioral, and computational approaches. Music Perception, 17, 151-196.
88. Kühn, H. (1973). DieHarmonikderArsNova [The harmony of Ars Nova]. München: Emil Katzbichler.
89. Larson, S. (1997). The problem of prolongation in tonal music: Terminology, perception, and expressive meaning. Journal of Music Theory, 41, 101-136.
90. Larson, S., & VanHandel, L. (2005). Measuring musical forces. Music Perception, 23, 119-136.
91. Leach, E. E. (2006). Gendering the semitone, sexing the leading tone: Fourteenth century music theory and the directed progression. Music Theory Spectrum, 28, 1-21.
92. Leech-Wilkinson, D. (1996). The well-formed virelai. In P. dalla Vecchia & D. Restani (Eds.), Trent'anni di ricerche musicologiche: Studi in onore di F. Alberto Gallo [Thirty years of musicological research: Studies in honor of F. Alberto Gallo] (pp. 125-141). Rome: Edizioni Torre d'Orfeo.
93. Leman, M. (2000). An auditory model of the role of shortterm memory in probe-tone ratings. Music Perception, 17, 481-510.
94. Lerdahl, F. (1988). Tonal pitch space. Music Perception, 5, 315-350.
95. Lester, J. (1978). The recognition of major and minor keys in German theory: 1680-1730. Journal of Music Theory, 22, 65-104.
96. Lippius, J. (1610). Disputatio musica tertia [Third discussion of music]. Wittenberg: Johann Gormann.
97. Lippius, J. (1612). Synopsis musicae novae [Outline of new music]. Strasbourg: Kieffer.
98. Litschfield, M. (1988). Aristoxenus and empiricism: A reevaluation based on his theories. Journal of Music Theory, 32, 51-73.
99. Loosen, F. (1993). Intonation of solo violin performance with reference to equally tempered, Pythagorean, and just intonation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 93, 525-539. (Pubitemid 23117066)
100. Lowinsky, E. E. (1961). Tonality and atonality in sixteenthcentury music. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
101. Malmberg, C. F. (1918). The perception of consonance and dissonance. Psychological Monographs, 25, 93-133.
102. Mattheson, J. (1713). Das neu-eröffnete Orchestre [The new orchestra]. Hamburg: Schiller.
103. McGowan, J. (2008). "Consonance" in tonal jazz: A critical survey of its semantic history. Jazz Perspectives, 2, 69-102.
104. Meddis, R., & Hewitt, M. J. (1991). Virtual pitch and phase sensitivity of a computer model of the auditory periphery. I: Pitch identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 2866-2882.
105. Meyer, L. B. (1956). Emotion and meaning in music. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
106. Meyer, L. B. (1989). Style and music: Theory, history, and ideology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
107. Michels, U. (Ed., 1994). dtv-AtlaszurMusik [German Pocketbook Publishers' illustrated history of music]. München: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
108. Milne, A. j. (2009). A psychoacoustic model of harmonic cadences (Unpublished Master's thesis). University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
109. Moore, B. C. j. (2003). An introduction to the psychology of hearing (5th ed.). London, UK: Academic.
110. Mos, L. P. (1998). On methodological distinctions: Nomothetic psychology, or historical understanding. Theory and Psychology, 8, 39-57. (Pubitemid 128475692)
111. Motte, D. de la (1981). Kontrapunkt [Counterpoint]. Kassel: Bärenreiter.
112. Narmour, E. (1977). Beyond Schenkerism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
113. Narmour, E. (1990). The analysis and cognition of basic melodic structures: The implication-realization model. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
114. Nolan, D. (1997). Quantitative parsimony. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 48, 329-343. (Pubitemid 127443949)
115. Norton, R. (1984). Tonality in Western culture: A critical and historical perspective. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
116. Novack., S. (1977). The significance of the Phrygian mode in the history of tonality. Miscellanea Musicologica, 9, 82-127.
117. Qettingen, A. von (1913). Das dualeHarmoniesystem [The dual system of harmony]. Leipzig: C. F. W. Siegel.
118. Oram, N., & Cuddy, L. L. (1995). Responsiveness of Western adults to pitch distributional information in melodic sequences. Psychological Research, 57, 103-118.
119. Parncutt, R. (1988). Revision of Terhardt's psychoacoustical model of the root(s) of a musical chord. Music Perception, 6, 65-94.
120. Parncutt, R. (1989). Harmony: A psychoacoustical approach. Berlin: Springer.
121. Parncutt, R. (1993). Pitch properties of chords of octavespaced tones. Contemporary Music Review, 9, 35-50.
122. Parncutt, R. (1994). Template-matching models of musical pitch and rhythm perception. Journal of New Music Research, 23, 145-168.
123. parncutt, R. (1996). Praxis, Lehre, Wahrnehmung. Kritische Bemerkungen zu Roland Eberlein: Die Entstehung der tonalen Klangsyntax [Practice, pedagogy, perception: Critical comments on Roland Eberlein's The emergence of tonalharmonic syntax] . Musiktheorie, 11, 67-79.
124. parncutt, R. (1997). A model of the perceptual root(s) of a chord accounting for voicing and prevailing tonality. In M. Leman (Ed.), Music, gestalt, and computing-Studies in cognitive and systematic musicology (pp. 181-199). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. (Pubitemid 127140549)
125. parncutt, R. (1999). Tonality as implication-realisation. In P. G. Vos & M. Leman (Eds.), Proceedings of Expert Meeting on Tonality Induction (pp. 121-141). Ghent: University of Ghent.
126. parncutt, R. (2005). Perception of musical patterns: Ambiguity, emotion, culture. In W. Auhagen, W. Ruf, U. Smilansky, & H. Weidenmüller (Eds.), Music and science-The impact of music (pp. 33-47). Halle, Germany: Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina.
127. parncutt, R. (2007). Systematic musicology and the history and future of Western musical scholarship. Journal of Interdisciplinary Music Studies, 1, 1-32.
128. parncutt, R. (2009). Tonal implications of harmonic and melodic Tn-types. In T. Klouche & T. Noll (Eds.), Mathematics and computing in music (pp. 124-139). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
129. PARNCUTT, R., & BREGMAN, A. S. (2000). Tone profiles following short chord progressions: Top-down or bottom-up? Music Perception, 18, 25-57.
130. PARNCUTT, R., & PREM, D. (2008, August). The relative prevalence of Medieval modes and the origin of the leading tone. Poster session presented at the International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition (ICMPC10), Sapporo, Japan.
131. popper, K. R., & Eccles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain. New York: Springer-Verlag.
132. powers, H. S. (1981). Tonal types and modal categories in Renaissance polyphony. Journal of the American Musicological Society, 34, 428-470.
133. powers, H. S. (1992). Is mode real? Pietro Aron, the octenary system, and polyphony. Basler Jahrbuch für historische Musikpraxis, 16, 9-52.
134. powers, H. S. (1998). From psalmody to tonality. In C. C. Judd, (Ed.), Tonal structures in early music (pp. 275-340). New York: Garland.
135. Rahn, J. (1980). Basic atonal theory. New York: Schirmer.
136. Rakowski, A. (1990). Intonation variants of musical intervals in isolation and in musical contexts. Psychology of Music, 18, 60-72.
137. Rameau, J.-P. (1971). Treatise on harmony (P. Gossett, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1721)
138. Randel, D. M. (1971). Emerging triadic tonality in the fifteenth century. Musical Quarterly, 57, 73-86.
139. Randel, D. M. (1986). The new Harvard dictionary of music. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
140. Reichweger, G., & parncutt, R. (2009). Pitch salience in chords of harmonic complex tones. In J. Louhivuori, T. Eerola, S. Saarikallio, T. Himberg, & P. Eerola (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Triennial Conference of European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music (ESCOM 2009) (pp. 438-442). Jyväskylä, Finland: University of Jyväskylä.
141. Riemann, H. (1893). VereinfachteHarmonielehre [Simplified theory of harmony]. London, UK: Augener.
142. Riemann, H. (1905). Das Problem des harmonischen Dualismus [The problem of harmonic dualism]. Neue Zeitschrift für Musik, 101, 3-70.
143. Riemann, H. (1914/1915). Ideen zu einer "Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen" [Ideas for a "theory of tonal imagery"]. Jahrbuch der Musikbibliothek Peters, 21/22, 1-26.
144. Rivera, B. v. (1978). The Isagoge (1581) of Johannes Avianius: An early formulation of triadic theory. Journal of Music Theory, 22, 43-64.
145. Rivera, B. v. (1979). Harmonic theory in musical treatises of the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries. Music Theory Specrtrum, 1, 80-95.
146. Rivera, B. V. (1984). The seventeenth-century theory of triadic generation and invertibilitiy and its application in contemporaneous rules of composition. Music Theory Spectrum, 6, 63-78.
147. Rivera, B. v. (1989). Studies in analysis and history of theory: The sixteenth and seventeenth Centuries. Music Theory Spectrum, 11, 24-34.
148. Rosen, C. (1972). The classical style: Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven. New York: Norton.
149. Runyan, W. M. (1988). Psychology and historical interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press.
150. Russo, F. a., Cuddy, L. L., Galembo, a., & Thompson, W. F. (2007). Sensitivity to tonality across the pitch range. Perception, 36, 781-790.
151. Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928. (Pubitemid 26424776)
152. Sauveur, J. (1701). Principes d'acoustique et de musique, ou système général des intervalles des sons [Principles of acoustics and music, or a general system of tonal intervals] . Paris: Academie Royale des Sciences.
153. Schachter, C. (1995). The triad as place and action. Music Theory Spectrum, 17, 149-169.
154. Schenker, H. (1954). Harmony (E. M. Borgese, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1906)
155. Schneider, p., Sluming, v., Roberts, N., Scherg, M., Goebel, R., Specht, H.-J. et al . (2005). Structural and functional asymmetry of lateral Heschl's gyrus reflects pitch perception preference. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1241-1247. (Pubitemid 43348144)
156. Schoenberg, A. (1954) Structural functions of harmony. New York: Norton.
157. Schubert, P. (2002). Counterpoint pedagogy in the Renaissance. In T. Christensen (Ed.), Cambridge history of Western music theory (pp. 503-533). Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
158. Seither-Preisler, A., johnson, L., Krumbholz, K., Nobbe, A., Patterson, R.D., Seither, S., & LüTkenhÖner, B. (2007). Tone sequences with conflicting fundamental pitch and timbre changes are heard differently by musicians and non-musicians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 743-751.
159. Shepard, R. N. (1982). Structural representations of musical pitch. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (pp. 343-390). New York: Academic Press.
160. Shepherd , J. (2003). Music and social categories. In M. Clayton, T. Herbert, & R. Middleton (Eds.), The cultural study of music: An introduction (pp. 69-79). London, UK: Routledge.
161. Simms, B. (1975). Choron, Fétis, and the theory of tonality. Journal of Music Theory, 19, 112-139.
162. Smith, A. B. (1997). A "cumulative" method of quantifying tonal consonance in musical key contexts. Music Perception, 15, 175-188. (Pubitemid 127804936)
163. Smith, N. A., & Schmuckler, M. A. (2004). The perception of tonal structure through the differentiation and organization of pitches. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 268-286. (Pubitemid 38422585)
164. Sperber, D. (1985). Anthropology and psychology: Towards an epidemiology of representations. Man, 20, 73-89
165. Steinke, W. R., Cuddy, L. L., & Holden, R. R. (1993). Perception of musical tonality as assessed by the probe-tone method. Canadian Acoustics, 21, 85-86.
166. Steinke, W. R., Cuddy, L. L., & Holden, R. R. (1997/1998). Dissociation of musical tonality and pitch memory from nonmusical cognitive abilities. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 316-334. (Pubitemid 127685414)
167. Stumpf, C. (1911). Konsonanz und Konkordanz [Consonance and concordance]. Beiträge zur Akustik und Musikwissenschaft, 6, 116-150.
168. Sundberg, J. (1982). In tune or not? A study of fundamental frequency in music practice. In C. Dahlhaus & M. Krause (Eds.), Tiefenstruktur der Musik [Deep structure of music] (pp. 69-97). Berlin: Technical University of Berlin.
169. Sundberg, J. (1988). Computer synthesis of music performance. In J. A. Sloboda (Ed.), Generative processes in music (pp. 52-69). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
170. Temperley, D. (1999). What's the key for key? The Krumhansl-Schmuckler key-finding algorithm reconsidered. Music Perception, 17, 65-100.
171. Temperley, D. (2001). The cognition of basic musical structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
172. Tenney, J. (1988). A history of'consonance' and 'dissonance.' New York: Excelsior.
173. Terhardt, E. (1972). Zur Tonhöhenwahrnehmung von Klängen [On the perception of pitch in complex sounds]. Acustica, 26, 173-199.
174. Terhardt, E. (1976). Ein psychoakustisch begründetes Konzept der musikalischen Konsonanz [A psychoacoustically based concept of musical consonance]. Acustica, 36, 121-137.
175. Terhardt, E. (1982). Die psychoakustischen Grundlagen der musikalischen Akkordgrundtöne und deren algorithmische Bestimmung [The psychoacoustical foundations of musical chord-roots and their algorithmic determination]. In C. Dahlhaus & M. Krause (Eds.), Tiefenstruktur der Musik [Deep structure of music]. Berlin: Technical University of Berlin.
176. Terhardt, E., Stoll, G., & Seewann, M. (1982). Pitch of complex tonal signals according to virtual pitch theory: Tests, examples and predictions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71, 671-678. (Pubitemid 12103030)
177. Thompson, W. F. (1986). Judgments of key change in Bach chorale excerpts: An investigation of the sensitivity to key, voicing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario.
178. Thompson, W. F., & Parncutt, R. (1997). Perceptual judgments of triads and dyads: Assessment of a psychoacoustic model. Music Perception, 14, 263-280.
179. Thompson, W. F., & Cuddy, L. L. (1997). Music performance and the perception of key. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 116-135. (Pubitemid 127456159)
180. Thomson, W. (1958). The problem of tonality in pre-Baroque and primitive music. Journal of Music Theory, 2, 36-46.
181. Tillman, B., Bharucha, J. j., & Bigand, E. (2000). Implicit learning of tonality: A self-organizing approach. Psychological Review, 107, 885-913.
182. Tinctoris, J. (1950). Liber de Arte Contrapuncti [Book about the art of counterpoint]. (O. Strunk, Ed. & Trans., in Source readings in music history). New York: Norton & Co. (Original work published 1477)
183. Tinctoris, J. (1951). Terminorum musicae diffinitorium [Dictionary of musical terms]. Paris: Richard-Masse (Original work published 1475)
184. Treitler, L. (1991). Medieval improvisation. World of Music, 33, 66-91.
185. Treitler, L. (1999). The historiography of music: Issues of past and present. In N. Cook & M. Everist (Eds.), Rethinking music (pp. 356-377). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
186. Vos, P. G. (2000). Tonality induction: Theoretical problems and dilemmas. Music Perception, 17, 403-416.
187. Vos, P. G., & Leman, M. (Eds.). (2000). Special issue on Tonality induction. Music Perception, 17, 401-544.
188. Wason, R. W., & Marvin, E. W. (1992). Riemann's "Ideen zu einer Lehre von den Tonvorstellungen": An annotated translation. Journal of Music Theory, 36, 69-79.
189. Werckmeister, A. (1687). Musicae mathematicae hodegus curiosus oder Richtiger Musicalischer Weg-Weiser [Proper guide to music(al composition)]. Frankfurt: Calvisius.
190. Winnington-Ingram, R. p. (1932). Aristoxenus and the intervals of Greek music. Classical Quarterly, 26, 195-208.
191. Youngblood, J. E. (1958). Style as information. Journal of Music Theory, 2, 24-35.
192. Zarlino (1573). Le institutioni harmoniche [The rules of harmony]. Venetia: Appresso Francesco de i Franceschi Senese.