Embolic protection devices and the Penumbra 054 catheter: Utility in tandem occlusions in acute ischemic stroke

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 50-53

  Hui, Ferdinand K ^a   Hussain, Muhammad S ^a   Elgabaly, Mohamed H ^a   Sivapatham, Thinesh ^a   Katzan, Irene L ^a   Spiotta, Alejandro M ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TISSUE PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATOR;

ADULT; ANGIOPLASTY; APHASIA; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION CATHETER; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CASE REPORT; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFUSION; DEVICE REMOVAL; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY OCCLUSION; MALE; MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY OCCLUSION; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; STENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VASCULAR ACCESS; WEAKNESS;

ANGIOPLASTY; CAROTID ARTERY THROMBOSIS; CATHETERIZATION; EMBOLIC PROTECTION DEVICES; HUMANS; INFARCTION, MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STENTS; STROKE;

EID: 79954492397     PISSN: 17598478     EISSN: 17598486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jnis.2010.003012     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Rubiera M, Ribo M, Delgado-Mederos R, et al. Tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion: an independent predictor of poor outcome after systemic thrombolysis. Stroke 2006;37:2301-5. (Pubitemid 44337173)
2. Kim DJ, Kim DI, Byun JS, et al. Intra-arterial thrombolytic therapy for hyperacute ischemic stroke caused by tandem occlusion. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26:184-9.
3. Lavallee PC, Mazigh M, Saint-Maurice JP, et al. Stent-assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus intravenous thrombolysis in internal carotid artery dissection with tandem internal carotid and middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2007;38:2270-4. (Pubitemid 47457567)
4. Nedeltchev K, Brekenfeld C, Remonda L, et al. Internal carotid artery stent implantation in 25 patients with acute stroke: preliminary results1. Radiology 2005;237:1029.
5. Miyamoto N, Naito I, Takatama S, et al. Urgent stenting for patients with acute stroke due to atherosclerotic occlusive lesions of the cervical internal carotid artery. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2008;48:49-56.
6. Jovin TG. Emergent stenting of extracranial internal carotid artery occlusion in acute stroke has a high revascularization rate. Stroke 2005;36:2426-30. (Pubitemid 41566971)
7. Hussain MS, Lin R, Cheng-Ching E, et al. Endovascular treatment of carotid embolic occlusions has a higher recanalization rate compared with cardioembolic occlusions. J NeuroInterv Surg 2009;2:71-3.
8. Coppi G, Moratto R, Silingardi R, et al. PRIAMUS - Proximal flow blockage cerebral protection during carotid stenting: results from a multicenter Italian registry. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2005;46:219-27. (Pubitemid 43932983)
9. Ohki T, Parodi J, Veith FJ, et al. Efficacy of a proximal occlusion catheter with reversal of flow in the prevention of embolic events during carotid artery stenting: an experimental analysis. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:504-9. (Pubitemid 32215598)
10. Kelso R, Clair DG. Flow reversal for cerebral protection in carotid artery stenting: a review. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther 2008;20:282-90.
11. Edgell RC, Yavagal DR, Agner C, et al. Recanalization of a symptomatic extracranial internal carotid artery near occlusion with proximal and distal protection: technical case report. Neurosurgery 2007;61:E174. (Pubitemid 47356510)
12. Barbato JE, Dillavou E, Horowitz MB, et al. A randomized trial of carotid artery stenting with and without cerebral protection. J Vasc Surg 2008;47:760-5.
13. Jansen O, Fiehler J, Hartmann M, et al. Protection or nonprotection in carotid stent angioplasty: the influence of interventional techniques on outcome data from the SPACE trial. Stroke 2009;40:841-6.