Not a call for papers - A call for systematic reviews!

International Journal of Clinical Practice

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 518-

  Minhas, R ^a  

^a British Medical Journal Technology Assessment Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST;

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GOLD STANDARD; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NARRATIVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC);

PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 79954480771     PISSN: 13685031     EISSN: 17421241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02670.x     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Vogel T, Brechat PH, Leprêtre PM, et al., Health benefits of physical activity in older patients: a review. Int J Clin Pract 2009; 63: 303-20.
2. Citrome L,. Systematic reviews: much ado about a lot. Int J Clin Pract 2009; 63: 832-3.
3. Grosso AM, Bodalia PN, MacAllister RJ, Hingorani AD, Moon JC, Scott MA,. Comparative clinical and cost-effectiveness of candesartan and losartan in the management of hypertension and heart failure: a systematic review, meta- and cost-utility analysis. Int J Clin Pract 2011; 65: 253-63.
4. Ernst E,. Deaths after chiropractic: a review of published cases. Int J Clin Pract 2010; 64: 1162-5.
5. Edwards SJ, Clarke MJ, Wordsworth S, Borrill J,. Indirect comparisons of treatments based on systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract 2009; 63: 841-54.